Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about financial literacy classes
Essay on importance of financial literacy
Essay about financial literacy classes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay about financial literacy classes
David J Lynch says that, “ [s]ocieties that manage a narrower gap between rich and poor enjoy longer economic expansions”, however, in the United States the gap between the have and have-nots has widened (source C). “This country is just getting worse and worse and worse … and that is not a recipe for stable growth” (source C). If we do not do something soon our capitalist country will fall. In order for the income inequality gap to lessen to create a more stable economy the government must invest in education and unionize workers and not provide higher taxation for the top one percent. Throughout the years, “ U.S income inequality has been increasing steadily since the 1970s and now has reached levels not seen since 1928” (Source A). …show more content…
Though it is vital for the government to put some measures in place, some ideas are not the best ideas. For instance, high taxation on the wealthy. Some people claim that increasing taxes on the wealthy will “raise the top marginal tax rate and close tax loopholes that disproportionately favor the wealthy” (Source E). It may be true that it will close loopholes for the wealthy; however, “ heavy taxation and regulation will simply drive [the wealthy] to operate elsewhere [leading to] a huge net loss to the country” (Source D). This means that the country will get poorer and in more debt from importing goods from the companies that left, thus, the government will have to raise taxes, which will take money from the poor and what little middle class we have left. Without the free reign of the capitalist society, America would not be America. Their are however things the government can do to lower the income gap without putting consequences on the …show more content…
The best thing the gonvornment can do is invest in education, because “[m]ore financial education in public schools is a must” (Source H). Children should learn how to do the “basic Suze Orman stuff “ like “how to make a monthly budget” and “ what saving and barrowing mean“ and “how wealth builds over time” ( Source H). If we do this people can learn at a younger age how to handle their money and be responsible. In order for this to work the gonvornment must allow the schools to teach to the individual because students learn differently. They also need to allow the teachers to teach to the students the way the students learn which will make a better educated person and a better class of
Stone, Chad, Danilo Trisi, Arloc Sherman, and William Chen. "Center on Budget and Policy Priorities." A Guide to Statistics on Historical Trends in Income Inequality. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 6 Nov. 2013. Web. 03 Dec. 2013. .
David Autor definitely agrees with the statements of Proposition #2 by acknowledging that much of the income gap is a result of lack of education, low minimum wage and the bargaining power of labor unions among other things, all of which are a result of purposeful policy that has favored wealthy people at the expense of the poor. Autor discussed the inequality in classes and the income gap that has arisen between the upper 1% and the rest of modern society in recent years and exactly why that happened. As the majority of the economy’s jobs have moved away from the agricultural and industrial areas in the last 100-150 years, skills and education have become much more vital as careers as doctors, lawyers and other professional fields have become higher demanded and therefore more available. The entry into college has become even more vital for people to sustain jobs or even get one in the first place so the upper middle class who can afford to go to college profit, while the lower end of the 99 percent suffer because they can’t afford to pay for college which leads to a higher standard of living. Events such as the Vietnam War pushed more people who could afford it to enter college and artificially raised the national percentage of college students because this allowed them to evade the draft and avoid military
America in today's society is burdened with many economic and political problems that have begun to plague the nation. Controversial topics are constantly being debated from sunrise to sunset across the country with supporters and those who oppose each bearing various levels of financial and political misfortune. With the numerous economic and political problems that affect the nation, the argument over the issue of income inequality is one of the most notable. Creating a political civil war, proponents from both sides have brought the issue into national view and debate has grown substantially within recent years.
Americans have financially and politically. Much of the financial gains made today go to the top one percent of earners in the United States. This increase in inequality has grown substantially in the last forty years. Wage inequality is different than the push for equal pay. According to Fortune.com, the salaries of CEO’s compared to the average worker are 300 times more (Addady 1). One of the reasons CEO’s are profiting more money is because technological advances are replacing human labor with robots or software. This investment in technology by firms increases the bottom line and is ever more important with the rising minimum wages set by local, state, and federal
The reality is that the economic gap within the classes is great and growing. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the gap between the richest and "everyone else" in America is the greatest it has been since the end of WWII. Professor Edward N. Wolff of N.Y.U. states that the current era represents "the most extreme level of wealth concentration since the late 1920's" (Gates 17).
Wealth inequality is a real issue that needs to be fixed. The imbalanced growth of the upper class compared to the middle class is a danger to American society as a whole. The rich becoming richer while the middle class remains the same leads to a power imbalance, with the rich using their money to run the country the way they see fit while the middle class speaks to ears that do not listen. The issue of wealth inequality needs to be fixed by raising taxes on the rich.
Between the end of World War II and the late 1970s, income inequality in the U.S. was reduced; but since 1970s, the situation with wealth distribution has changed. Data from tax returns in 1976 show that the top 1 percent of households received 8.9 percent of all pre-tax income. In 2008, the top 1 percent’s share had more than doubled to 21.0 percent.
Income inequality in the United States, as of 2007, has reached levels not seen since 1928. In 1928, the top one percent received nearly 24% of all income within the United States (Volscho & Kelly, 2012). This percentage fell to nearly nine percent in 1975, but has risen to 23.5% as of 2007 (Volscho & Kelly, 2012). Meanwhile, in 2007 (see
“A Guide to Statistics on Historical Trends in Income Inequality.” cbpp.org. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2013. Web. 06 April. 2014. .
Recently, studies have shown that income inequality has many connections that have caused the gap in the United States. According to the research I found, income inequality is connected to corruption, trade, wages of workers, and education. The world income inequality had declined since the twentieth century according to the studies found (Clark). Corruption falls increasing on low income individuals more than higher income individuals. Additionally, the trade theory suggests that the free trade might have level up the income inequality higher within countries by the different patterns of wages and demand for workers who are skilled and unskilled (Silva and Leichenko). Moreover, the education of wealthier people has it easier because the learning efforts of education are unbalanced. Besides, income inequality in the United States is hurting our economy due to the all the issues of corruption, trade, wages, and education. Suggested by Robert H. Frank article called “Income Inequality: Too Big to Ignore,” the income inequality is bad for our economy (Frank).
Income inequality has affected American citizens ever since the American Dream came to existence. The American Dream is centered around the concept of working hard and earning enough money to support a family, own a home, send children to college, and invest for retirement. Economic gains in income are one of the only possible ways to achieve enough wealth to fulfill the dream. Unfortunately, many people cannot achieve this dream due to low income. Income inequality refers to the uneven distribution of income and wealth between the social classes of American citizens. The United States has often experienced a rise in inequality as the rich become richer and the poor become poorer, increasing the unstable gap between the two classes. The income gap in America has been increasing steadily since the late 1970’s, and has now reached historic highs not seen since the 1920’s (Desilver). UC Berkeley economics professor, Emmanuel Saez conducted extensive research on past and present income inequality statistics and published them in his report “Striking it Richer.” Saez claims that changes in technology, tax policies, labor unions, corporate benefits, and social norms have caused income inequality. He stands to advocate a change in American economic policies that will help close this inequality gap and considers institutional and tax reforms that should be developed to counter it. Although Saez’s provides legitimate causes of income inequality, I highly disagree with the thought of making changes to end income inequality. In any diverse economic environment, income inequality will exist due to the rise of some economically successful people and the further development of factors that push people into poverty. I believe income inequality e...
Meanwhile, the wealthiest 1 percent took in 19 percent of America’s income in 2012—their highest share since 1928 (McClelland 551). Noting that 1928 was one year before the Great Depression, similar levels of income inequality should be cause for concern. In addition, between 1970 and today, the share of the nation’s income that went to the middle class—households
However, as one has finally entered college, you become more observant of the workforce and lifestyle of many around the world. Today kids are still living with mom and dad, they have no job, and no intentions of going to school or even doing good in school. People around the world have the latest and greatest clothes and technology, yet they can’t seem to afford food or a roof over their head. The governments solution to this problem is let them impose a greater tax on the rich, so those who can’t afford the necessities of life are simply handed these items. While this is fabulous for those who are poor, it is imposturous for those who have worked hard all their life. People who have worked hard have rightfully earned all that they have worked for. The government is teaching lower class American’s that its okay to sit on their butts all day and not go out and get a job, because someone else will ultimately cover that cost for you. In a perfect society, everyone earns what you deserve. You can’t sit around and do nothing and expect the essentials and great things of life to be handed to
Income inequality continues to increase in today’s world, especially in the United States. Income inequality means the unequal distribution between individuals’ assets, wealth, or income. In the Twilight of the Elites, Christopher Hayes, a liberal journalist, states the inequality gap between the rich and the poor are increasing widening, and there need to have things done - tax the rich, provide better education - in order to shortening the inequality gap. America is a meritocratic country, which means that everybody has equal opportunity to be successful regardless of their class privileges or wealth. However, equality of opportunity does not equal equality of outcomes. People are having more opportunities to find a better job, but their incomes are a lot less compared to the top ten percent rich people. In this way, the poor people will never climb up the ladder to high status and become millionaires. Therefore, the government needs to increase all the tax rates on rich people in order to reduce income inequality.
The government would most likely do this by raising taxes for the rich to fund social programs or by forcefully increasing minimum wage. Due to the growth in distance between the rich and the poor in the world I mostly agree with the source however, if the government 's power is not limited they could make the economy worse.