In the short story "If I Were a Man" by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, the perspective society held for ladies was inadequacy to men. Society has held its own impression of the ideal woman, and what a women's contribution is to be in our society. One might say that the concentration of the “ideal woman” has moved a considerable amount since the mid 1900’s the point at which women's suffrage started here in the United States. The esteem held by women amid this day and age was construct more in light of outward appearance, instead of what could be offered intellectually. Autonomy and flexibility of the women outside of her marriage and beloved once was a foolish idea to many. In today's world women's external appearance and beauty is only an impetus …show more content…
In the beginning of the story Mollie is presented, and immediately consideration is coordinated towards her appearance. “Mollie was “true to type.” She was a beautiful instance if what is reverentially called “a true woman. Pretty, of course –no true woman could possibly be plain. Whimsical, capricious, charming changeable, devoted to pretty clothes and always “wearing them well.” (Gilman 34) This quote says a lot in what is viewed as a women, her magnificence, her size, what she wore influenced her a “true woman.” We sense Mollie's sentiments of inadequacy and needing to be more than a residential housewife, and somebody who is heard. Mollie wanted to take care of business, not in odd sense but rather in the acknowledgment that men did for sure have a greater number of opportunities than ladies, and even in case of a contention she felt that possibly on the off chance that she was a man, her musings would be …show more content…
“At first it was a funny sense of size and weight and extra thickness, the feet and hands seemed strangely large, and her long, straight, free legs swung forward.” (Gilman 34) Taking from this there is energy about the flexibility of his body that she didn't need to concern herself for instance about weight, or in the event that she was viewed as being “prim and proper.” Mollie even realizes Gerald’s contemplation, and understands his day to day life and her is two entirely unexpected universes. Gerald’s attire symbolizes the flexibility he held as a man, in comparison to women where they have to choose to wear this match or that pair of slacks. Women were required to dress in clothing that was fitting which was a dress or skirt, no jeans were worn by ladies unless, and it was their work clothing. The flexibility of choice when it came to something as basic as what was worn, was something Mollie held to be essential. Indeed, even the substance found in Gerald's pockets held more an incentive to Mollie. Women depended fiscally upon their spouses, and the financial freedom, of having the capacity to venture into a pocket, and haul out a nickel for toll, or penny for a paper was something she
...e can, however, signal her virginal status by dressing in a way that represents its equivalent: as a southern belle. In addition to her low-cut blue dress, with its feminine, puffed sleeves, Arvay wears a floppy-brimmed “leghorn-intention” (straw hat), decorated with a “big pink rose” (suggestive of reproduction). Most tellingly, we are told that she is wearing a corset that is “laced very tight” – so tight that she cannot eat her dinner. Corsets hold in the flesh and nip in the waistline to an attractively small diameter. By narrowing the waist, they emphasize the swellings of the hips and breasts, a contrast intended to stimulate sexual arousal. Thus Arvay’s wedding/reception attire emphasizes her fragility and innocence while highlighting her desirability. The clothing signs her as an object for consumption, rather than celebrates her as a beautiful companion.
Scout, the protagonist, is a young girl coming of age in a society trying to shove her into a dress and the role of a gilded daughter. For example, when Scout recalls a conversation with her Aunt Alexandra, a figurehead for society and one of the major female figures in her life, she begins to shine her own light on how to brighten her father’s life in a way that is true to herself. On page 108, Scout comes to terms with the fact that she is defying stereotypes, “I could not possibly be a lady if I wore breeches; when I said I could do nothing in a dress, she said I wasn’t supposed to be doing things that required pants. Aunt Alexandra’s vision of my deportment involved playing with small stoves, tea sets, and wearing the Add-A-Pearl necklace she gave me when I was born; furthermore, I should be a ray of sunshine in my father’s lonely life. I suggested that one could be a ray of sunshine in pants just as well, but Aunty said that one had to behave like a sunbeam, that I was born good but had grown progressively worse every year. She hurt my feelings and set my teeth permanently on edge,
Grandmother often thought if she dressed and acted the part of a lady, then she would be acting in an acceptable manner, but the way the reader views her actions is not the same.
The title of this book comes from the inspiring words spoken by Sojourner Truth at the 1851, nine years prior to the Civil War at a Women’s Rights Convention in Akron, Ohio. In Deborah Grays White, Ar’n’t I a woman her aim was to enrich the knowledge of antebellum black women and culture to show an unwritten side of history of the American black woman. Being an African- American and being a woman, these are the two principle struggles thrown at the black woman during and after slavery in the United States. Efforts were made by White scholars in 1985 to have a focus on the female slave experience. Deborah Gray White explains her view by categorizing the hardships and interactions between the female slave and the environment in which the slave was born. She starts with the mythology of the female slave by using mythologies such as Jezebel or Mammy, a picture that was painted of false images created by whites in the south. She then moves to differences between male and female slavery the harsh life cycle, the created network among the female community, customs for slave families and the trip from slavery to freedom, as well as differences between the female slave and the white woman, showing that there is more history than myth. (White, 5) Thus, bringing forth the light to the hardships and harassment that the black woman faced in the Antebellum South.
Millhone’s personality is “free spirit” and a tomboy type of character in this novel. She tends to avoid the typical female gender orientation by wearing mostly jeans, shorts, and, most importantly, turtleneck sweaters as a normal part of clothing attire when she begins her day with a morning jog: “A pair of shorts and an old cotton turtleneck. I’m really not a physical fitness advocate” (Grafton 67). In this manner, Millhone is not a woman that is overly concerned with her appearance, which gives her a carefree quality in her behaviors. This aspect of Millhone’s character defines a tomboy personality that cares very little for the traditional “feminine” gender role.
Back in Celie’s time women putting on a pair of pants was a paramount statement. The pants are also her source of economic success. Page 146: "Well,
In the essay “What Meets the Eye”, Daniel Akst explains scientific facts about the beauty of men and women matters to people. He argues that attractive individuals receive attention, great social status, marries, and gets paid more on a job. One can disagree with Akst’s argument because anyone with the skills and knowledge, despite the appearance, can gain a decent relationship and can get paid well. Akst looks at beauty as if it can lead individuals to an amazing and successful life, but he is wrong. Nancy Mairs’ and Alice Walker’s views on beauty are explained internally and through self-confidence. Both women’s and Akst’s arguments on beauty share some similarities and differences in many ways, and an
This shows the importance of appearance in this time period. It was typical for wealthy women to dress so elegantly at parties or other social events. This description of attire also shows, to some extent, the practice Mrs. Hammond used in the exaggerated display of her daughters.
For over centuries, society had established the societal standard of the women. This societal standard pictured the ideal American woman running the household and taking care of the children while her husband provided for the family. However, between 1770 and 1860, this societal standard began to tear at the seams. Throughout this time period, women began to search for a new ideal of American womanhood by questioning and breaking the barriers society had placed upon them.
Scout is expected to behave like “a lady” but she resists conforming to those roles. For example, Scout faces discrimination because she doesn’t dress how society wants her to dress. More specifically, her aunt Alexandra forces her into a dress that which Scout does not want to wear. “Aunt Alexandra was fanatical on the subject of my attire. I could not possibly hope to be a lady if I wore breeches; when I said I could do nothing in a dress, she said I wasn’t supposed to be doing things that required pants” (Lee, 108).
When Scout was forced to wear a dress because Aunt Alexandra wanted her to be more ladylike, she “...felt the starched walls of a pink cotton penitentiary closing in on [her], and for the second time in [her] life [she] thought of running away. Immediately” (Lee 182). Scout was a tomboy since she lived with her father and brother; dresses and girly things annoyed her. Her inner self was contained in the dress, and she wanted out. When Aunt Alexandra was hosting a church fundraising tea, Miss Maudie asked Scout where her britches were. Scout responded by saying, ‘‘Under my dress’” (Lee 307). By wearing her overalls under her dress, she appears ladylike since everyone wants her to, but is still the tomboy she always wants to be. Scout has matured to realize what’s best for her and the people around her. She realized the social normalities of Maycomb and knew what others thought of her. Without this internal conflict, Scout would have disregarded other people’s opinions and just do what was right in her mind. Scout’s internal conflicts transformed her to be her own person while taking others’ opinions into
Gender presents itself in various ways. It is a social construct that has a strong influence on almost everybody. Both gender roles and gender expression are actively engaged forces in our lives to the point where they are inescapable. Charlotte Perkins Gilman specifically explores gender roles and their effects in her story “If I Were a Man.” In a sense, Gilman’s “If I Were a Man” inexplicitly delves into the impact and limitations of society’s assigned gender roles. Through her character Mollie Mathewson, Gilman is able to display how complicated this broad spectrum that gender falls under really is. Gilman does this through her analysis of masculinity and femininity, using Mollie to bring awareness to the differences of the male and female purpose, and addressing the consequence of social rejection as a result of gender non-conformity.
The holocaust attested that morality is adaptable in severe conditions. Traditional morality stopped to be contained by the barbed wires of the concentration camps. Inside the camps, prisoners were not dealt like humans and thus adapted animal-like behavior needed to survive. The “ordinary moral world” (86) Primo Levi refers in his autobiographical novel Se questo è un uomo (If This Is a Man or Survival in Auschwitz), stops to exist; the meanings and applications of words such as “good,” “evil,” “just,” and “unjust” begin to merge and the differences between these opposites turn vague. Continued existence in Auschwitz demanded abolition of one’s self-respect and human dignity. Vulnerability to unending dehumanization certainly directs one to be dehumanized, thrusting one to resort on mental, physical, and social adaptation to be able to preserve one’s life and personality. It is in this adaptation that the line distinguishing right and wrong starts to deform.
“Girls wear jeans and cut their hair short and wear shirts and boots because it is okay to be a boy; for a girl it is like promotion. But for a boy to look like a girl is degrading, according to you, because secretly you believe that being a girl is degrading” (McEwan 55-56). Throughout the history of literature women have been viewed as inferior to men, but as time has progressed the idealistic views of how women perceive themselves has changed. In earlier literature women took the role of being the “housewife” or the household caretaker for the family while the men provided for the family. Women were hardly mentioned in the workforce and always held a spot under their husband’s wing. Women were viewed as a calm and caring character in many stories, poems, and novels in the early time period of literature. During the early time period of literature, women who opposed the common role were often times put to shame or viewed as rebels. As literature progresses through the decades and centuries, very little, but noticeable change begins to appear in perspective to the common role of women. Women were more often seen as a main character in a story setting as the literary period advanced. Around the nineteenth century women were beginning to break away from the social norms of society. Society had created a subservient role for women, which did not allow women to stand up for what they believe in. As the role of women in literature evolves, so does their views on the workforce environment and their own independence. Throughout the history of the world, British, and American literature, women have evolved to become more independent, self-reliant, and have learned to emphasize their self-worth.
I would like to begin with the fact that women have always been known to dedicate their time to beauty. Those who are devoted to their appearance most often believe that beauty brings power, popularity, and success. Women believe this, because they grow up reading magazines that picture beautiful women in successful environments; not to mention they are popular models and world famous individuals. Beautiful women are no longer just a priority for most advertising, but we have become a walking target for the working class employers. It is documented that better-looking attorneys earn more than others after five years of practice, which was an effect that grew with experience (Biddle, 172). We cannot overlook the fact that it is always the most popular and most beautiful girl who becomes homecoming-queen or prom-queen. While these are possible positive effects of the "beauty myth," the negative results of female devotion to beauty undercut this value. These effects are that it costs a lot of money, it costs a lot of time, and in the long run, it costs a lot of pain.