I, Too 'And From The Dark Tower' By Countee Cullen

703 Words2 Pages

The poems “I, Too” by Langston Hughes and “From the Dark Tower” by Countee Cullen are both written by black men during the period of the Harlem Renaissance (1276, 1279). Both of these poems address the oppression and discrimination of black people and the hope for equality that the authors have. Through an analysis of the differences in the tone, style of writing and the implied audiences of the two poems, we can better understand how each author viewed the subject of their discrimination and oppression.
Countee Cullen’s “From the Dark Tower” is an Italian sonnet that uses vivid imagery such as, “the golden increment of bursting fruit”, to gild a subject as crude and brutal as oppression (1276). I don’t think that his intention was to sugarcoat or cushion the truth of the situation because he expresses their pain in line 13, “… in the dark we hide the heart that bleeds.” It is in phrases like this that the author’s intricate language serves to amplify the emotional aspect of the poem (1276). Cullen recognizes how …show more content…

Their poems have the same general theme. However, the poems themselves could not be more different. Cullen’s “From the Dark Tower” is structured, elegant and filled with striking imagery (1276). While it is aimed at the black community, realistically only the well-educated would be able to actually muddle their way through the large words and formal speech. Langston Hughes’s “I, Too”, on the other hand, is more of a common man’s poem. It’s easy to understand and doesn’t require an advanced vocabulary (1279). That’s not to say it is any less powerfully emotive. Hughes manages to imbue the short phrases of everyday words with a wealth of emotion. Both authors write of their current oppression and hope for the future. Cullen seems to say, ‘We are made for better things than this’ (1276). While Hughes seems to say, ‘It won’t be much longer, soon things will be better’

Open Document