Human Skeletal Research Paper

843 Words2 Pages

2. Bipedal Skeletal Adaptations The bipedal walking cycle of a modern human and non-human primates is significantly different because skeletal morphology is also significantly different. Paleontologists examine the skeletal morphology to determine if a fossil hominid showed any evidence of bipedal adaptation. This section will discuss the uniqueness of the human walking cycle and the major skeletal areas that are involved in bipedal locomotion.
2.1 The Human Walking Cycle Harcourt‐Smith (2007), explains that the modern human walking cycle is characterized by two distinct phases: the stance phase, when the leg is on the ground, and the swing phase, when it is off the ground. The knee is fully extended and the foot dorsiflexes, the heel hits the ground before the rest of the foot. The foot then plantar flexes, and force is transmitted through to the substrate along its lateral border. The body is then directly over the weight bearing foot and then it carried forward momentum over the leg, and force moves …show more content…

Non-human primates have a more flexible knee than humans because it’s advantageous in arboreal activity. A modern human’s femur is angled, creating a valgus knee and allowing it to lock. Humans need to have a stable locked knee to support their body weight. Mchenry and Corruccini (1978) report that, since a human's femur is angled inward, their weight is supported at the midline of the body when walking. The femur attaches to the pelvis at an angle and the knee is underneath the body. As a result, humans are able to stand upright for a long period of time without exerting all of their energy. Humans have a longer femur than non-bipeds this increases the length of the stride, making it possible to travel long distances more efficiently (Mchenry and Corruccini, 1978). Non-human primates do walk exclusively walk on two legs and therefore not need as much support in the knee

Open Document