Human Rights And Norms On Non-Western Countries

453 Words1 Page

Is promoting human right standards forcing a particular set of morals and norms on non-Western states, absolutely not! As much as the United States or the large majority of Western states have and are attempting to apply ideologies, laws, or ethics into non-Western states (whether that’s right or wrong can be debated), the right to human rights is of much greater importance and should not only be a topic of global discussion but integrated into every countries society. Although the United States is the most common example of a “melting-pot” state, and compared to many other states, is much more culturally diversified. Many states have and continue to struggle with religious or ethical conflict based off the simple ideology of human rights. Eastern Africa is a perfect example of this as we speak, the Democratic Republic of …show more content…

Rather, amongst its own citizens concerning cultural and tribal conflict. While human rights can be a rather difficult problem to solve overnight or around the world, especially considering what is happening within our own states borders here in the U.S. The promotion of human rights cannot be seen as something unmoral. Goldstein defines universal human rights as, “no matter where a person resides; no matter his or her ethnic or clan traditions, that person has certain rights that must be respected.” As much as I couldn’t agree more with Goldstein’s definition, it is without question that this is not something that is granted to each and every one of us. Universal rights of humans should be the most accepting of “guaranteed” right of any person on this planet

Open Document