Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Thoreau government essay
Thoreau's views
Thoreau felt about government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Thoreau government essay
Into the Wild Essay “‘Government is best which governs not at all,’” Henry David Thoreau once said. Thoreau, author of “Civil Disobedience” and “Walden,” believed that “government” and “restrictions” were synonymous, especially regarding education and liberty. In Into the Wild, by John Krakauer, the main character, Chris McCandless, lived as free from any restriction, whether in law or imposed by other individuals, as he possibly could in order to greatly enhance his quality of life and his level of education. Jean-Jacques Rousseau, one of the great French philosophers of the eighteenth century and author of “Emile,” had similar beliefs to those of Thoreau and McCandless regarding government, freedom, and education. In the twenty-first century, …show more content…
Both men believed strongly that “government is best which governs least,” and they both despised when any sort of authority was imposed on them (Thoreau 137). McCandless had the utmost disdain for governing bodies and “‘their stupid rules’” (Krakauer 6). He wanted absolutely nothing to do with the government in any facet of his life, and he especially did not want the government interfering with his education. The government and its agencies impeded on his education several times throughout the text. The first major time the government attempted and failed to limit the extent of the education of McCandless was when he was in the Lake Mead National Recreation Area. National parks limit and regulate off-road driving instead of allowing park attendees the freedom of exploring to their fullest capabilities. He ignored “posted warnings that off-road driving [was] strictly forbidden,” and “McCandless steered the Datsun off the pavement where it crossed a broad, sandy wash” (Krakauer 27). Especially in the case of McCandless, the government was “inexpedient” regarding the education of Chris, acting as more of a nuisance or a road block than anything that would benefit his education (Thoreau 137). Chris realized early on that it is the people of a nation, not the government of one, that “keep the country free… settle the West,” and “educate” (Thoreau 138). …show more content…
Thoreau was an abolitionist, so he was extremely against slavery in the USA. Thoreau understood how utterly horrendous the enslavement of one human being by another is, but he believed that the enslavement of the human mind by oneself was the worst type of slavery. He argued that “it is hard to have a southern overseer; it is worse to have a northern one” (Thoreau 1762). Slaves had minimal control over their life choices in the USA. Most slaves were forced to remain illiterate and uneducated throughout their entire lives. If they attempted to learn to read or teach their children, their owners would beat them. To slave owners, slaves were solely a regulated, cheap labor force that they could use however they wanted. To Chris, public high school was similar to southern slavery. He was extremely frustrated with the lack of education he was receiving, but this educational slavery was to be expected from an institution run by the government, which, to McCandless, only existed to interfere with and obstruct the amount of liberty people have to acquire new information and control their own lives. Chris may have only attended Emory University because he believed he would have vastly greater amounts of academic freedom. Chris may have thought that universities were groups of buildings that students utilize in order to learn immensely more information than was possible in high school. He viewed college more
“I have had a happy life and thank the Lord. Goodbye and may God bless all!”(199), these were the last words of Chris McCandless in a picture with him smiling and waving good-bye. Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer is an extension of an article first published in Outside magazine. In the book, Krakauer further explains the journey of Chris McCandless, while providing his own insight to provide the reader a better understanding of the McCandless reasoning. McCandless lived a nomadic life after he graduated from college, traveling from South Dakota to Mexico. However, his two year journey proved fatal when he took a trip to Alaska, his greatest undertaking. Among his remains several books were discovered, including a copy of Walden by Henry D. Thoreau
McCandless used the idea of escaping society from “Walden” by Henry David Thoreau and tried to mesh it together with the ideas of solitude and isolation to form his own beliefs. McCandless misinterpreted what Thoreau was saying. Thoreau states, “I had not lived there a week…It is true, I fear, that others may have fallen into it, and so helped to keep it open.” (Thoreau 3).Thoreau specifically states in this quote that he does not want others to follow or even go do what he did. He also did build the cabin a few miles away from a town because he knew he would go back one day. Thoreau was a sane person in doing this because crazy people stray too far away from society despite the consequences. He believed that he had other things to do with his life and not spending a minute more in that lifestyle. McCandless still went out into the wilderness away from society against Thoreau’s words. Chris was crazy to shun s...
To begin with, McCandless’s decision to walk into the wild was acceptable because he wanted to become an inspiration and an individual. Emerson states, “There is a time in every man’s education when he arrives at the conviction that envy is ignorance: that imitation is suicide” (Emerson). Chris McCandless left to shun the conformist society that he could feel changing him. Chris wanted the chains that bound him to be broken. Society takes the individual and locks it up and destroys it. According to Emerson, “It is easy in the world to live after the world’s opinion: it is easy to in solitude to live after our own: but the great man is he who in the midst of the crow keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude” (Emerson). McCandless left his materialistic family to be his own person ad to be unique. The world’s opinion does not make the man wh...
Krakauer theorizes on why McCandless desired freedom in order to give his audience an idea of why freedom is so valuable for the development of individuals. Growing up, McCandless had a seemingly normal childhood, where he was loved by his parents and sister, and family was well off financially. As McCandless grew up however, tension began to rise between McCandless and his father. The main problem was that McCandless was a simple person who didn’t care about material possessions and money, however, his father pushed him to pursue college and a career which McCandless felt like was restricting him from being himself. Through the years his resentment began to grow.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau books were a blueprint on how Rousseau wanted to know the reasons of why the people gave up their natural liberty over the state of nature. How the political standpoint became such an impact in people’s lives. One of the things he did state in his book that stuck out to me was that “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.” How I interrupted this quote, it’s basically saying that men are born free into this world on the account that with each law against the nature of things, that the men are shackled to the world with rules and regulations for him to follow or suffer the consequences of your actions.
In this short story Thoreau plays the protagonist as well as a pacifist. He continually reiterates his beliefs of law and conscience. Thoreau believes we have a conscience to determine right and wrong and views the government, at a state level at least, as useless. He gives the reader several examples of things the government does that would be against most conscious decisions. Such as: The listing of accomplishments the “government” made possible, included in this list is the repetition of the word “It” referring to the government. “It does not keep the country free. It does not settle the West. It does not educate. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished”(221).
For an example of the authors use of specific examples while describing what the media decides as news worthy the author writes, “The public rarely hears about the routine ceremonies at state dinners, but when President George Bush threw up all over the Japanese prime minister in 1992, the world’s media jumped on the story” (Edwards, Wattenberg, Lineberry, 2015, p. 398). This is an indication of how the media decides what is newsworthy. This quote demonstrates some of the strengths of the article because, not only does the quote support how the media decides what is news worthy, but it also shows no bias and is a factual, specific example. Another quote that demonstrates the strengths of the article is “Journalists and politicians have a symbiotic relationship, with politicians relying on journalists to get their message out and journalists relying on politicians to keep them in the know”. (p.400). this quote demonstrates the strengths of the article because, it shows how the media gets its news, how politicians gains their influence, and shows no bias. One last quote that emphasizes the strengths of this excerpt is “The media can even have a dramatic effect on how the public evaluates specific events by emphasizing one event over others. When during a 1976 presidential debate, President Ford incorrectly stated that the Soviet Union did
Life is a form of progress- from one stage to another, from one responsibility to another. Studying, getting good grades, and starting the family are common expectations of human life. In the novel Into the Wild, author Jon Krakauer introduced the tragic story of Christopher Johnson McCandless. After graduating from Emory University, McCandless sold of his possessions and ultimately became a wanderer. He hitchhiked to Alaska and walked into the wilderness for nearly 4 months. This journey to the 49th state proved fatal for him, and he lost his life while fulfilling his dream. After reading this novel, some readers admired the boy for his courage and noble ideas, while others fulminated that he was an idiot who perished out of arrogance and
Into the Wild by John Krakauer is a rare book in which its author freely admits his bias within the first few pages. “I won't claim to be an impartial biographer,” states Krakauer in the author’s note, and indeed he is not. Although it is not revealed in the author's note whether Krakauer's bias will be positive or negative, it can be easily inferred. Krakauer's explanation of his obsession with McCandless's story makes it evident that Into the Wild was written to persuade the reader to view him as the author does; as remarkably intelligent, driven, and spirited. This differs greatly from the opinion many people hold that McCandless was a simply a foolhardy kid in way over his head. Some even go as far as saying that his recklessness was due to an apparent death-wish. Krakauer uses a combination of ethos, logos and pathos throughout his rendition of McCandless’s story to dispute these negative outlooks while also giving readers new to this enigmatic adventure a proper introduction.
Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild, describes the adventure of Christopher McCandless, a young man that ventured into the wilderness of Alaska hoping to find himself and the meaning of life. He undergoes his dangerous journey because he was persuade by of writers like Henry D. Thoreau, who believe it is was best to get farther away from the mainstreams of life. McCandless’ wild adventure was supposed to lead him towards personal growth but instead resulted in his death caused by his unpreparedness towards the atrocity nature.
Chris McCandless is regarded as being something as a spiritual figure almost as a cult hero, some call him a disillusioned fool, some call him a great adventurer, and the debate still continues. As Matthew Power calls in his article, an article where he tells the story of McCandless,“The debate falls into two camps: Krakauer's visionary seeker, the tragic hero who dared to live the unmediated life he had dreamed of and died trying; or, as many Alaskans see it, the unprepared fool, a greenhorn who had fundamentally misjudged the wilderness he'd wanted so desperately to commune with.” Like so many stories covering Christopher McCandless’ death, both ends of the argument are discussed in an unfavored manner in the hopes to help develop an opinion on the McCandless story. This open ended question can only be answered open-endedly based on what the readers base for themselves as covered stories intend. Like Power has done, ...
First, I outlined my arguments about why being forced to be free is necessary. My arguments supporting Rousseau’s ideas included; generally accepted ideas, government responsibility, and responsibility to the government. Second, I entertained the strongest possible counterargument against forced freedom, which is the idea that the general will contradicts itself by forcing freedom upon those who gain no freedom from the general will. Lastly, I rebutted the counterargument by providing evidence that the general will is always in favor of the common good. In this paper I argued in agreement Rousseau that we can force people to be
The first manner, would include a logical perspective and analyzation of McCandless’s actions - viewing it as an ill-mannered movement and idea of freedom and exploration through the experiences of a young man. The notion of the typical “wild child” could be brought to mind, and argued as a defense to explain his actions. However, serving as a counterbalance to this perspective, is the notion that McCandless had gone into the wild to serve as an indirect commentary towards society and what it stands for. This second manner, would include a spiritual/commentary perspective of freedom - instead of a logical perspective. McCandless denounces and rejects what he sees as materials - money, objects, etc: Instead, he chooses to go off into the real world, before civilization, construction, cultivation. He goes into the wilderness, gains new experiences, and meets new people. The connecting point in both perspectives of freedom, would be the drive to obtain such an untouchable concept - in it’s purest form. Untouched and untainted, no matter how logical or illogical it may have
"Liberal Media Bias." [[ - - Carolyn Gargaro's Web Site - Home of a Conservative Female! - - ]]. Web. 10 Nov. 2010.
In our democratic society, mass media is the driving force of public opinion. Media sources such as Internet, newspaper, news-broadcasts, etc, play significant roles in shaping a person’s understanding and perception about the events occurred in our daily lives. As long as the newspapers, internet, network television, etc, continued to be easily accessible to the public, the media will continue to have an influence in shaping its opinions. Factors such as agenda-setting, framing and priming help shape the public opinions. Agenda-setting is when the media focuses their attention on selected issues on which the public will form opinion on, whereas framing allows the media to select certain aspects about the problem and then make them appear more salient. Similarly, priming works by repeatedly exposing certain issues to public. As the issues get more exposure, the individual will be more likely to recall or retain the information in their minds. This paper will discuss these three factors played out systemically by media and how our opinions are constantly being influence and shape by them.