How Does Pyrrhus Change In Hamlet

542 Words2 Pages

“To be or not to be” has many more meanings than to live or not to live, or to kill one’s self or not to. Inside Hamlet’s educated mind he sees parallels with his story and Greco-Roman mythology, the play in the mousetrap and even in the events immediately preceding the play. He tries to justify his actions using his trust in the mimetic ability of literature that he has come to trust but instead finds the story of Pyrrhus, which only serves as a vehicle to detail his murderous wantings. Pyrrhus also find himself in the situation of a son searching for revenge for his murder father. Though, unlike Hamlet, Pyrrhus instead lacks the intellect of Hamlet, which causes his transformation into a murderous psychopath, killing the wounded Priam. This mocks the very moral ground Hamlet hopes to rest his revenge upon, in other words, “ …show more content…

Hamlet thinks he conceives a brilliant plan to catch Claudius by overwhelming his emotions to force him to admit to murdering his brother, the King. Little does Hamlet know that the plot of his backfires and shows the plot and emotional similarities in the world of Gonzago and his own world. At his request, the players include a “dozen or sixteen lines”(II.ii.541) into play. To insert these lines Hamlet depicts the murder, Lucianus, as the nephew of the king, instead of the brother to the king. Unintentionally, Hamlet draws attention towards himself as the play seems to mimic him as Lucianus, the murder, instead of Claudius as Lucianus. Most scenes should not have the interpretation changed by an issue of semantics and familial relations. Nut, this proves the exact opposite of the play. Shakespeare, therefore, prompts Hamlet to contend with a contradiction, a paradox: if Lucencious is the brother of the King the action is immoral, if Lucencious is the nephew of the king the action is

Open Document