How Does Obama Violate The Constitution

1130 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Judicial review in marbury v madison

You would think that Obama would have more respect for the Constitution since we has an ex-Law Professor. Meanwhile, Obama has violated the Bill of Rights just as much as Lincoln did. Obama used the Department of Justice to prevent Arizona and Alabama from enforcing their own immigration laws, which violated the 10th Amendment. Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that allowed military forces to engage in civilian law enforcement by suspending due process rights. (Trautman, 2012) The NDAA without question violates the 5th and 6th Amendment of the Constitution.
Legislature Branch President Obama is not the only one to blame for the many violations of the Constitution. Congress was been violating the Constitution even before …show more content…

They only wanted the judicial branch to be limited, but thanks to Marbury v. Madison, our judicial branch has become the strongest branch out of them all. This case helped increase the powers of the court to overturn any law they feel is invalid. Since Justices and federal judges are appointed instead of elected, they serve until they resign, pass away or be impeached. Since the president has the authority to appoint Justices and federal judges, he/she could mold the courts to their likings. With the judicial branch, the president could change or amend anything he/she wants to. The Accordable Care Act (ACA) is a prime example of this. Based upon Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution, the federal government cannot create direct taxes. With the of the Supreme Court, Obama was able to cloak a direct tax as a …show more content…

Obama created several executive orders in the attempt to track who has a firearm and why do they need one. Just with the use of a pen and paper, Obama was able to control the use of firearms with excessive background checks. Obama will try to make an argument that these executive actions were created to protect our children from gun violence. On the other hand, not a single order was created to control assault or high-caliber weapons. It is also safe to say that Obama believes that owning a firearm is a privilege. Unfortunately, our federal government has made the same mistake involving abortion, same-sex marriage, having a fair and speedy trial, possessing medical marijuana, having health insurance, practicing your own religious beliefs, and having privacy in your own

Show More
Related

  • Lincoln's Suspension Of Habeas Corpus Analysis

    1451 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of President Lincoln’s most notable infringements was his suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. Within months of taking the presidential oath, Lincoln ordered the suspension of habeas corpus, citing “supra-constitutional reasons for taking unilateral executive action.” Attorney General Edward Bates’ defense of Lincoln’s actions regarding habeas corpus in which he refers to it as a privilege rather than a guaranteed civil liberty serves as basis for proving the illegitimacy of this act. If the writ of habeas corpus, which protects citizens from unlawful imprisonment, is viewed in the manner that Bates (and Lincoln for that matter) refers to it, one of the most basic constitutional liberties of a right to trial can easily be deprived and can very well devolve into despotism later

    Read More

  • Separation Of Powers Dbq Essay Power

    556 Words  | 2 Pages

    In document C says, ¨The constant aim is to divide and arrange the powers in a manner that they may be a check on one another.¨ This tells that the constitution is written so that the three branches of government are constantly checked by one another because a law is unfair, biased, or unconstitutional. This also makes it to where the branches of government can't make whatever law they want allowing them to have complete power to do whatever they please thus preventing tyranny. If the branches couldn't check each other they would be able to easily pass laws that only benefit themselves and they could make laws that would put people in harm's way, being able to check each other and putting that in the constitution was a very insightful task. Being able to check each other prevented any one branch from gaining and holding complete control over the

    Read More

  • Does Congress Have Too Much Power Over Commerce?

    2342 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States explicates the enumerated powers that the people have granted to their public administration. A narrow interpretation of the Constitution would mean denying the government the powers granted to them to keep order, equality, and fairness. An expanded interpretation would “extend words beyond their natural and obvious import, and we might question the application of the term…” (244). It is the government’s responsibility to exercise powers that cannot be exercised by its governed people. There are no guidelines in the Constitution’s composition that discloses how to interpret the language; therefore, it is in the hands of three federal branches of government to decipher the Constitutions meaning.

    Read More

  • The New Science of Politics

    813 Words  | 2 Pages

    "This inquiry will naturally divide itself into three branches- the objects to be provided for by a federal government, the quantity of power necessary to the accomplishment of those objects, the persons whom that power ought to operate," writes Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist #23 in reference to the separation of powers. The basic concept here is the idea of the federal government being divided into three separate branches that would balance excessive democracy through a system of checks on each other. The three branches, respectively known as the legislature (Article I), the executive (Article II), and the judiciary (Article III), were designed to entice the opponents of the Co...

    Read More

  • The War Powers Act

    1037 Words  | 3 Pages

    The farmers of our Constitution recognized the need for separate powers as well as checks and balances among the executive, legislative and judicial branches. This in turn helps to "provide for the common defense". Separation of powers prevents one branch from becoming excessively dominant over the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution of the United States of America.: In order to accede to the preamble and adhere in its goals, the Constitution ensures this is by clearly stating the authority of the Congress in Article I Section 8 and the authority of the President in Article II Section 2. These fixed powers in the Constitution clearly state that one cannot act without permission or authorization of another. It is designed to that one cannot take action without consent of the other branch. This is prevalent in Article I Section 7 that states the process of how a law is passed. The fact that there are clear steps to the initiation of a law states the importance of separation of powers so that a single dominant branch does not arise.

    Read More

  • Gun Control Is Not Enough

    1327 Words  | 3 Pages

    “I don’t believe people should be able to own guns. (Obama)” This said prior to Obama’s presidency, in the 1990’s, is still a topic that is constantly questioned today. Many American’s feel the need to seek ownership of weapons as a source of protection; While others believe that private ownership of guns will do nothing more but heighten the rate of violence due to people taking matters into his or her own hands. Philosophy professor Jeff McMahan agrees with Obama’s statement in regard to the ownership of guns. In his New York Times editorial titled “When Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough,” McMahan provides evidence to support his theory of the dangers that quickly follow when allowing the community to own guns legally. McMahan, throughout the text, shows responsible reasoning and allows the reader the opportunity to obtain full understanding and justifies his beliefs properly.

    Read More

  • The Patriot Ac Does NOT Violate Constitutional Rights

    1204 Words  | 3 Pages

    Citizens of any country are given some rights as well as responsibilities, and the United States of America is no exception. The Constitution (US Const) of the USA as well as the first ten amendments, also known as “Bill of Rights”, defines the framework of it. It is a supreme law that defines how Federal Government works.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay: America Needs Gun Control

    610 Words  | 2 Pages

    Imagine enjoying a movie at Cinema 10, eating a meal at Taco Bell, or even sitting in a history class at Carman-Ainsworth High School while people all around you are carrying loaded guns! Although this may seem unbelievable, it is possible because the second amendment of the United States Constitution gives citizens the right to possess and carry guns. It is understandable that Americans would want to possess guns such as shotguns and rifles for the popular sport of hunting. However, it is ridiculous that our government would allow people to carry handguns. Handgun possession should be strictly limited, because they are made solely to kill people, they have increased the murder rate in the U.S., and they have even allowed children to easily kill other children.

    Read More

  • essay 2

    774 Words  | 2 Pages

    We have been following the Constitution for over a hundred years and have a president today who is obeying but all laws and not will to change. He will change but not change for the worse like Gilead. Our people are too strong to stoop to the level of those in Gilead.

    Read More

  • Constitutional Republic

    800 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Founding Fathers limit the power of government in the Constitution utilizing many different tactics, many more than even the aforementioned. Their main intent was to make the nation less democratic and to keep the government small. The Constitution has accomplished the Founding Fathers' goal until now, and will hopefully continue doing so in the future.

    Read More

  • The Quasi War

    1827 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...itution, there is an allotment for the suspension of habeas corpus if there is an instance of rebellion, which the Civil War was. Adams’ and Wilson’s policies, however, blatantly defied the Constitution. Although it is true that they did it in good intent, it’s similar to a poor person robbing a gas station to get some food; it may be with good intentions, but it is still wrong. The Constitution is what we, as Americans, have accepted as our unbreakable laws. In our eyes, the Constitution is almost sacred. So, when Presidents decide that their laws can override what we believe to be just, it lessens the value of the Constitution. It is my belief that in times of crisis or war, when national survival is at stake, the upholding of our Constitution is more imperative than ever, to prove to American citizens that our government will stand by what they have promised us.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: Is Gun Control Good Or Bad?

    1063 Words  | 3 Pages

    Obama said several things in his speech that were inaccurate while completely missing the mark on "Gun Show Loopholes". However, he does kind of have the right idea. There is not a gun show in the country that doesn't do background checks for all "dealer sales". If a gun is part of a store or dealers stock inventory, then a background check is already done. The problem that was missed is that, for some reason, it is legal for a dealer to sell an apparently unlimited number of guns to himself, making him their legal owner, and then selling them to whomever he

    Read More

  • Which Branch Of Government Is More Powerful?

    1120 Words  | 3 Pages

    The United States government is designed with checks and balances to ensure that no one branch can become more powerful than another. Though this may be the case, it is still possible that one branch of the our government can still be more powerful than the others. The equality of power in our government has constantly changed over the course of the life of the United States. Although these changes have occurred, we still have not made all of the branches equal and the inequality has been due to meet the demands of the time. For example, in 1938 our country was facing a depression and nothing was getting done. So, Roosevelt took it upon himself to give the Executive branch more power, to then in turn, help the country creep back out of the hole it had dug itself. After the country didn’t need the reform bills and the size of the government that Roosevelt had put it, things were then downsized and put into a more stable equilibrium. Though there were attempts to make everything equal, the Legislative Branch now holds the majority of the power, and is the most powerful branch that our government has.

    Read More

  • The Power Of The Executive Branch

    1016 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...appoint Justices to the Supreme Court with a two-thirds vote approval by the House, has been turned upside down. Mitch McConnell, a senior US senator, has prevented Obama’s liberal appointee, Merrick Garland, from even being considered. The refusal to hear from or possibly even consider Obama’s nominee is a bold move by the Legislative branch to gain back lost power from the executive branch. In Federalist Paper No. 51, Madison writes, “In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next glace oblige it to control itself.” It is the Constitution 's founders who tried to inhibit the abuse of power, but the executive branch has continually stepped over its boundaries, and now the Legislative branch is following in the presidential footsteps.

    Read More

  • Competitive Federalism

    2725 Words  | 6 Pages

    Those who feared that the federal government would become too strong were assured by Madison in Federalist No. 14 that “in the first place it is to be remembered that the general government is not to be charged with the whole power of making and administrating laws…The subordinate governments, which can extend their care to all those other objects which can be separately provided for, will retain their due authority and activity”

    Read More

More about How Does Obama Violate The Constitution

Open Document