More handpicked essays just for you.
A literary analysis for Lord of the flies
A literary analysis for Lord of the flies
A literary analysis for Lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Lord Of The Flies
Once, in an English class William Golding was teaching, he decided to conduct an experiment with his students. William left his students in the classroom by themselves, allowing the students to control themselves. The entire experiment rapidly escalated as the students were on the brink of murdering each other, and the entire classroom turned into utter anarchy. This experiment became the inspiration for William Golding's Nobel Prize winning novel, Lord of the Flies. Golding once said, “Lord of the Flies was an attempt to trace the defects of human society back to the defects of the individual, the moral is that the shape of society must depend on the ethical nature of the individual.” In the novel Golding uses symbolism
…show more content…
In this novel we see the process of corruption in an individual, as well as observing how every person has evil festering inside them and the havoc it can reek in a society. Golding uses the characters Jack and Ralph to demonstrate this, Jack at first obeying Ralph's authority and then slowly becoming more and more power hungry and crazed. This allowed his true evil to show through when there is nothing stopping the evil intentions. The novel starts off with Ralph being voted in as chief of the boys, slowly building a civilized society, formed on rules and democracy. However, Jack is slightly agitated because he believes he should be chief and that he could provide better security for the other boys because he is stronger. When Ralph was elected, Jack spoke up with arrogance claiming, “I ought to be chief, because I'm chapter chorister and head boy.” (Page 22). Jack clearly has a problem with being thought of as anything …show more content…
Jack and his tribe of savages, murder two people, one being Piggy the boy Jack dismissed in earlier chapters not giving any thought to Simons emotional well being and the other being the novels Christ like character. Piggy was murdered by a rock rolling down a mountain which was not an accident, but was planned and carried out in a gruesome manner. The ending of the novel really just exposes how a lack of security can turn an innocent little boy into a deranged, murdering, insecure beast. This then causes problems in a society because Ralph is now unable to gain the control back which sends him spiraling out of control. This act of violence shows how all individuals harness an evil and when that evil is exposed it creates a defective human society because everyone lets their inner evil out without a care in the world. Jack and his savages then plan a hunt, but this time it isn't a pig hunt, this time they want to murder Ralph. “Sharpen a stick at both end.” (Page 190) This symbolic because of the fact, in the novel they mounted the head of the sow they killed on a stick sharpened at both ends. This is important because it shows just how far Jack is willing to go to make it known he will be the only chief and will not have competition. The boy’s have been on the island for months now, and have created a defective society which has killed two innocent people all because of the defective, corrupted
“I’m not going to play any longer. Not with you.” (127). Jack leaves Ralph’s tribe because Ralph is a coward and he makes the rules. Jack’s leadership qualities comes back with a force and he makes his own tribe. Jack does like anyone telling him what to do and he is frustrated because of Ralph taking over him. Another reason to make his own tribe is that Ralph does not appreciate Jack hunting and he accuses him to let the fire out. His leadership skills become stronger but in a negative way. His behavior has changed because of hunting and by spending time on the island. Jack has become a sociopath. Even his hunting style has become more violent. After hunting a sow, he tortures the pig physically until the pig has a painful death. He also cuts the throat of the pig and places the head on the stick as a sacrifice. This action shows psychopathic tendency and how he was not able to kill the pig in his first attempt in hunting and now he abuses the pig and sacrifices the head. “He squirmed and looked down.”(160). When Stanley, a member of Jack’s tribe asks Jack about the death of Simon, Jack replies him by nervously saying no. This response by Jack portrays that Jack is trying to tell himself that he his not responsible for his own actions. During Simon’s murder, Jack was wearing a mask on his face and that makes him not responsible for Simon’s murder. During the end of the novel, Jack starts wearing his mask all the time because he does not want to be responsible for his own actions. ““He’s going to beat Wilfred.” “what for?” Robert shook his head doubtfully. “I don’t know. He didn’t say. He got angry and made us tie Wilfred up. He’s been”-he giggled excitedly-”he’s been tied for hours, waiting-”” (159). This quote from the novel clearly shows how Jack has been treating his tribe members. He is beating them for no reason by tieing them up for hours. Jack shows no emotion and he has become cold blooded. The
The impact of Jack’s savagery on the island leads to the boys forgetting the real truth about about themselves. The boys on the island are able to explain that human are evil from the beginning and that they aren’t impacted by society. The boys see the island as a place where they are free from the adult world and without any rules. The boys don’t realize that a world without rules causes the chaos on the island and the savagery within the boys. Jack’s authoritative power forces him to push the rest of the boys out of their comfort zone by making them evil being that was not there true identity before. Upon realizing that the savagery they had obtained was only destroying themselves they “wept for the end of innocence, the darkness of man's heart”(202). The power that was developed by Jack impacts everyone and destroys all of the lives that rejected him. Piggy who was the most knowledgeable character and also the weakest character was often disrespected by Jack because he opposed Jack’s power and recognizes that his power not voted for. As as result, Piggy is killed by Jack’s own boys because they too have been impacted by brute force. They killed piggy just like how they hunted pigs. Next, Simon's death reflects the rejections of religion and the idea that the
...e and begins a wild chant, dancing around a fire. Towards the end of the book, the reader can fully see Jack’s brutal and savage nature as he orders a fire to kill Ralph. This extreme growth in Jack’s sinister side is very significant as this is what gives him the ability to have control over the group. It is also important as Golding is showing that human nature can be unforgiving and that there is a good and bad side to everyone.
Golding's View of Man and War Exposed in Lord of the Flies. & nbsp; ".Ralph wept for the end of innocence, the darkness of man's heart" (Golding 223). An author's view of human behavior is often reflected in their writing. The novel, Lord of the Flies, by William Golding is an example of a literary work that demonstrates the author's view of man, as well his opinion of war. & nbsp; Golding's Lord of the Flies is highly demonstrative of Golding's opinion that society is a thin and fragile veil that when removed shows man for what he truly is, a savage animal. Perhaps the best demonstration of this given by Golding is Jack's progression to the killing of the sow. Upon first landing on the island, Jack, Ralph, and Simon go to survey their new home.
After all, we’re not savage.” When Jack responds to Ralph, Jack is directly contradicting the statement he said when the children were first making the rules, which was, “Bollocks to the rules! We’re strong—we hunt! If there’s a beast, we’ll hunt it down! We’ll close in and beat and beat and beat—!.” Previously, Jack wanted to have more rules because he could manipulate the rules and control with an iron fist, while forcing the rest of the children to follow the rules. Now, he wants to abolish the rules so he could forward his own agenda of being the leader of the children by trying to assert himself as the “be all, end all ruler.” Without actually knowing it, Jack understands all the rules are superficial, and the removal of those rules will allow him to have the unregulated totalitarian control he seeks. Furthermore, children usually view rules as burdens and obstacles, in this survival of the fittest, Jack will take advantage of the situation and make an offer to the children: Jack or death. By writing this situation into the book, Golding is trying to warn the reader; the abolition of rules will lead to the downfall of society. The beginning of the descending spiral of violence started with Jack ignoring the rules and causing the previously tightly wound coil of order to start unraveling. In the end, the descent that Jack started ended with the fire on the island, Piggy falling off the cliff, and ultimately the death of innocence. Golding is using this story as an allegory of the real world, to explain the corruption of politics and business in the real world (which I will be expanding on in the third
Ralph and Jack are characters that hold important symbolism in Golding’s novel and the significance of their relationship is quite evident as events begin to unfold. When Ralph gets elected as leader of their group, Jack Merridew is evidently mortified at the prospect of losing leadership against Ralph. In an effort to pacify Jack’s anger, Ralph negotiates with Jack and gives him authority over the choir boys. Satisfied with Ralph’s courtesy, both boys develop mutual respect and their relationship advances into acquaintanceship which only takes a matter of time to fall apart.
In conclusion, William Golding gives Ralph the important qualities of bravery, order, and morality in order to become a good leader in challenging times. Ralph set the model that in any situation, good defeats evil. The best way to fight dark times is to find the light at the end of the tunnel, and replace the memories of horror, to the memories of joy.
After this incident we can see continual conflict between Ralph and Jack. We can see this when Jack proclaims that Ralph, “Isn’t a proper chief.” Golding is trying to show us that this conflict is very similar to the conflict between humanities inner barbarism and the living influence of reason. We can see other evidence of this conflict within ourselves, with the masks that Jack and his hunters put on. We are informed that Jack, “ rubbed the charcoal stick between the patches of red and white on his face” The mask represents the dark line (charcoal) between good (white) and evil (red) within ourselves. These masks also let the boys hide f...
Ralph is the novel’s protagonist and tries to maintain the sense of civility and order as the boys run wild. Ralph represents the good in mankind by treating and caring for all equally, which is completely opposite of Jack’s savage nature. Jack is the antagonist in the novel and provokes the most internal evil of all the boys. Jack is seen at first as a great and innocent leader but he becomes t...
Foremost in the evidence of Golding's pacifistic belief is the separation of the boys into good and evil. Although he exaggerates Ralph's evil as a leader, Ralph himself is portrayed as the victim. He is rendered to “shuddering spasms of grief” (202 Golding),
Ralph is one of the few boys who realize that the only way to survive is through peace and order. Because he summons the boys at the beginning of the novel with the conch he and Piggy find, they look upon him as the most responsible of the boys and elect him as a chief over the humiliated Jack. Ralph creates a stable and peaceful society for the children to live; this significantly bothers Jack because he wants to have fun and do things that he never did back in the civilized society. Jack is eventually successful of pulling nearly all of the children out of Ralph’s control to form savages. Ralph represents the civilization, and Jack represents the primitive society.
In the beginning of the book a plane crashes onto an island and the only survivors are a group of boys in a school choir. Enter Jack: the leader of a small group of choir boys. They call a meeting and decide how things will be run and decide on the rules. Jack seems for them, saying “We’ll have rules!...Lots of rules and then when anyone breaks ‘em-“(33). They then vote on a leader. The candidates are Jack and Ralph, and Ralph won. Although he isn’t happy about it, Jack accepts his loss, and decides to try his hand at exploring. While exploring with Ralph and Simon, Jack comes across a wild pig. He draws his knife in order to kill it but finds that he can’t. Something deep inside him says that it’s wrong to kill, “They knew very well why he hadn’t: because of the enormity of the knife descending and cutting into living flesh, because of the unbearable blood”. In his moment of hesitation the pig runs off, and he puts away the knife. Civilization won this time.
...ing him advice. However, they are tortured into revealing Ralph’s escape plan. Things like this show that Jack’s tribe have little respect for others. They do things that they wouldn’t do alone, because the rest of the group takes the blame. By this William Golding demonstrates what happens to society if order is not imposed by a government.
William Golding illustrates inherent evil in the human condition when outside forces are absent through the characters Roger, Ralph and Jack in his book, Lord Of The Flies. Roger shows evil by killing Piggy, his implied use of torture on Samneric and the intended beheading of Ralph. Ralph shows his evil by denying Simon's death, contributing to his death and taking pleasure in wounding the boar. Jack also shows evil by killing animals for pleasure, ruthlessly murdering Simon, and beating Wilfred for no apparent reason. By using these characters, Golding illustrates inherent evil. These three characters show how without civilization and order, it is very difficult to stay pure and true. Without civilization, inherent evil slowly becomes present.
William Golding wrote of his novel "Lord of the Flies" that the theme was an attempt to explore how the defects society are based largely on human nature rather than the structure of civilization. Golding used "Lord of the Flies" to allegorically explain that the architecture of a society depends on the morality of the individual rather than a social or political construction, regardless of its inherent merit or esteem.