Holden Caufield's Language

784 Words2 Pages

In Donald P. Costello’s article entitled “The Language of The Catcher in the Rye,” Costello supports his thesis, being that the language in the novel The Catcher in the Rye all serves a greater purpose, by delving into the linguistic elements of the novel as well as the significance behind them. Costello acknowledges the authenticity of the language used in the novel, but argues that Salinger’s intent was to use Holden Caufield’s speech to characterize him. To do this, he elaborates on the unique parts of Holden’s vernacular and how they are used, along with Holden’s awareness of his language. Finally, Costello closes his article by explaining why the specific language was employed. Initially, Costello explains that the language in the novel perfectly encapsulates the vernacular used by teenagers in the time period the book is set in. In order to support this statement, Costello mentions a plethora of reputable sources that also share the same belief. He even acknowledges reviewers with contrasting opinions by explaining that they did not agree that the book’s language was authentic because of how obscene is. Costello then uses this information as a base for the rest of his arguments within the paper. In order to build upon his first statement, Costello argues that although Holden’s language is a valid representation of teenager’s in that time period, Salinger was more focussed on using his language …show more content…

He makes the point that Holden’s slang lacks the ability to communicate because certain words have more than one meaning. One example of this is how “crap is used in seven different ways” within the story, making Holden’s slang unstable. It is also noted that Holden has various other faults in his speech such as his tendency to use clichés and his slim vocabulary. However, other slightly positive aspects of his speech, such as his creative phrases and flexible use of parts of speech are also

Open Document