Hindu Customary Law Case Study

885 Words2 Pages

The development of Hindu customary law was the extension and adaption of the Hindu customary law in India. The Hindu customary law in Malaysia was not necessary the same as that in India, thus, local customs were recognized by the court provided that they were not contrary to reasons, justice and general public policy. Contrary to the Chinese customary law, the Hindu customary law did not impose upon the courts in the Strait Settlements and Malay States, the problem of ascertaining its substantive principles. In ascertaining the principle of Hindu customary law, the court could rely on the evidence of experts on the local customs of the Hindu community and the authoritative texts of the 19th century.
Historically, Hindu marriage is inferred from laws translated in the Dharmashastras, which thusly have their roots …show more content…

On request, it was held that as the expired was a Hindu and the litigant a Chinese Buddhist the law which legislated the marriage between them was not Hindu law however the law of Malacca in 1943. There was a marriage as indicated by Hindu custom and in spite of the fact that there was an flawed wedding function, Barakbah LP was of the view that, it didn't influence the legitimacy of the marriage as it was performed amid the Japanese Occupation when developments of a single person and also a group were stringently confined. It was additionally held that the assent of the first wife regardless of the fact that it was key for the legitimacy of such marriage could be gathered from the circumstances of the case. This case demonstrates the recognition of Hindu Marriages as per Hindu custom and additionally its significance in guaranteeing the things of the Hindu Marriage function are conformed

Open Document