Hindlimb Evolution

647 Words2 Pages

The purpose of this study was to better understand the molecular mechanisms that control hindlimb reduction or absence during vertebrate evolution. The reduction or absence of hindlimbs has evolved in many different species such as reptiles, marine mammals, fish and amphibians. However, for this study the fish species known as the threespine stickleback species was focused on. Within this species the marine stickleback has a pelvis region where as the benthic stickleback does not. In order to analyze the molecular mechanisms at hand the scientists conducting this experiment carried out genetic crosses between threespine stickleback fish with complete or missing pelvic structures. This allowed the scientists to be able to identify the general …show more content…

Through this they were able to find, as is seen in figure 1.A of the report, that one gene in particular, the Pitx1 gene was highly correlated to the pelvic spine, pelvic girdle, ascending branch and asymmetry in the Stickleback species. Thus, in other words showing that there was a tight linkage between Pitx1 and the pelvic reduction phenotype. The next step for the scientists was then to determine whether or not there were any changes in the coding region of the Pitx1 gene between the marine and benthic stickleback species. In order to do this the entire coding region and exon-intron junctions in both marine and benthic individuals were sequenced. The results, which can be seen in figure 2 of the report, showed that the coding regions of Pitx1 were the same for both stickleback species. Thus, implying that the absence or presence of the pelvic region must be controlled through regulation of the Pitx1 gene. In order to test this the scientists examined the spatial patterns of expression of Pitx1 during normal development of both marine and benthic …show more content…

The reason why I believe figure 2 to be so pertinent to the results is because it shows that there is no mutation of Pitx1 in either the benthic or marine species that affects pelvic development (figure 2). Figure 3, is pertinent to the results because it takes this one step farther and actually shows that indeed the only difference between species that have a pelvic region and have an absence of a pelvic region is due to the regulation of the Pitx1 gene. I believe that the experimental data supports the conclusion of this paper because as I previously explained the results show that there is a major chromosome region that is controlling the presence or absence of pelvic structures. The results also show that there is no actual mutation within the Pitx1 gene between the different stickleback species. Not only that but the strong directional asymmetry seen in pelvic-reduced fish and the altered pattern of Pitx1 gene expression during development also goes to support the conclusion that there is a regulatory mutation. This regulatory mutation is thus responsible for the lack of Pitx1 gene in the benthic stickleback, which results in pelvic reduction and is most likely a cis-acting regulation

More about Hindlimb Evolution

Open Document