Herbert Kohl's Argument Essay

608 Words2 Pages

In this passage, the audience truly sees the meaning behind Herbert Kohl's message. His purpose for writing comes back to the fact that people interpret situations differently in every way. Kohl not only wanted to highlight the purpose behind wanting to learn something new but he also wanted readers to be aware that most time it does not come down to the inability of someone who doesn't want to learn but the real reason behind why they don't want to. People have different opinions on topics such as these but Kohl wanted to show that being able to want to stand up for your culture and the meanings behind it are rather important. Behind Kohl's purpose for writing, we see an insight into his past life relating to Wilfredo's. Kohl's reason for …show more content…

As we get further into the passage Kohl has put forth different ideas that attract the audience. Considering my own experiences and cultural beliefs I find that Kohl's argument really justified the fact that being able to stay morally intact to your culture is an obstacle and just because a specific person does not want to learn or adapt to a new part of society does not mean that it will result in failure. Personally, I agree with Kohl's explanation to the situation behind language. Being able to open up to something new such as a language really takes a lot of skill and drive to do after being so intertwined in your original culture such as Wilfredo was with Spanish. I also agree with Kohl that people mistakenly think others who are not willing to learn something new are just sprung over the fact that they might fail when that is not necessarily the case. I find it useful that Kohl related Wilfredo's choice with not wanting to learn Spanish with personal experience of growing up in a partially bilingual family. I concur that being able to alter your lifestyle in order to learn something else is very challenging with the thought that you may lose a significant part of your

Open Document