Heat And The Curious Incident Of The Dog In The Night-Time

997 Words2 Pages

In everyday life, humans are forced to decide whether they want to do something that abides by the rules, or if they want to follow the darker path. No one is perfect, and most people end up doing choosing both side in different periods of their life times; learning the effects of their decisions afterwards. In Heat by Mike Lupica and The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time, by Mark Haddon, Christopher and Michael were given several chances to choose between right and wrong, and these teenagers decided to take the right path, and do what’s morally right. First demonstration in these novels that share a common theme of doing good in their choice of actions in the beginning of the story. Michael did the right thing when when he …show more content…

Michael said, “ what did I do to become this guy's enemies? ... Become a better pitcher than him? Wasn't anybody in this league allowed to do that?”(194). Michael was able to remain calm, even when Justin was jeering and annoying him, because he knew that staying calm was the good thing to do, and that it will pay off for him in the long run. Christopher also abided by the common theme of doing good when he became afraid of his father after he lied and ended up being the one who murdered Wellington. Christopher was fearful as he decided through his logical reasoning that anyone who could do something this bad to a dog is cruel enough to hurt a human being. “I had to get out of the house. Father had murdered Wellington. That meant that he could murder me, because I couldn’t trust him, even though he said ‘Trust me,’ because he had told a lie about a big thing.”(122). Christopher felt that because his father was a ‘murderer’ he should run away, as it’s the right thing to do, because why live with someone who killed someone else? Due to his thinking, he believes that the good thing to do is run away, not only because he’s afraid because he doesn’t want to live with him. In the end, Michael and Christopher both did the right thing, instead of following the misleading path of

Open Document