Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive Behavioral Support research papers
What effect does the corporal punishment contribute to school children
Use of corporal punishment in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive Behavioral Support research papers
When children misbehave the first thing is to talk to them, when an adult misbehaves there could be more consequences than that of a child. Many years ago, the world was a different place and rules were enforced harsher than they are today. A punishment given 20 years ago is completely different than one a child would receive today. The punishment is no longer a spanking but a timeout and a talking to. Discipline in schools has changed as well detention and suspension are becoming a thing of the past and in its place are new methods of discipline. Yet, harsher discipline should be a requirement in school today to make a better society later. On the opposition 's side, Skiba and Losen would say to use “Positive Behavioral Interventions and …show more content…
Corporal punishment should be used as a last resort when a child breaks the rules, but it should be used when the child maintains the behavior they had been talked to about. So, that the teacher can enforce rules to be followed and show that disruptive behavior will not be allowed in the classroom. If the child than after multiple attempts to fix the problem, still continues with such behavior they should be allowed to use corporal punishment. In a study conducted by “Gordon Central High School found that when teachers used corporal punishment instead of the standard in school detention, or suspensions that students were more willing to take a few paddles on the buttocks than the standard punishment. The school found that when students took the corporal punishment that they were more willing to think before they acted the next time” (Lee and McMahon 3). Therefore, using corporal punishment in school would have a positive behavioral effect later in …show more content…
Children seem to be misbehaving more because there aren’t as many consequences as in years past. Teachers are no longer as respected as they used to be since they don’t have the right force to control the classroom as they did in years past. Vockell gives a great example about just how useful corporal punishment is “that the punishment is very clear if the teacher gives detention for three days the child and teacher have to stay upset the whole time, were as if corporal punishment was used it would be done and over with” (278). When using corporal punishment students would realize the consequences the actions they are displaying would affect their learning experience. This would teach them how to respect the people that are teaching them and later on leading them. As more states change from the use of corporal punishment as an effective way to teach discipline and respect for authority the more issues there will be. Without using corporal punishment, a child may believe that using terrible language is and alright practice later on in life. Then when talking with a CEO finds out it’s not because they don’t receive a call about the job. Without giving children the right consequences for their actions they will never respect the authority that they will encounter later on in
Dupper, David R. , and Amy E. Montgomery Dingus. "Corporal Punishment in U.S. Public Schools : A Continuing Challenge for School Social Workers." Schools and Children 30.4 (2008): 243-250. Print.
This transition was especially evident in schools as prior to the 1970’s it was commonplace to be punished with a spanking or a paddle in school to correct behavior. In the last thirty to forty years this type of punishment has ended and schools are using different forms of
Did you know that over half of the population spanks their children? The idea of using spanking as a punishment has raised controversy among parents. Spanking is the use of an open hand to strike someone and many parents want it to become illegal. While spanking has some down sides, it should remain legal because making it illegal would be difficult to enforce, and there are already laws against child abuse.
There is a difference between abuse and discipline and when this line is crossed, children cannot benefit from positively reinforced behavior. Neglect and abuse are not functions of discipline, and should never be used to punish your child. The point of disciplining children is to teach them right from wrong not to make them live in fear of making mistakes. Parents need to understand the fine line between abuse and discipline. Discipline should be positive reinforcement, it should be consistent, and it should be a learning opportunity for the child. Child abuse and neglect will affect the parent-child relationship, it will brutalize the parents, and can affect the child's life forever. It is important to positively reinforce good behavior and discipline to benefit both the children and the parents.
In western society, there has been debate in recent years over the use of corporal punishment for children in general, and increased attention has been given to the concept of "positive parenting" where good behavior is encouraged and rewarded
Corporal punishment is considered as an act of violence against children, and it includes any use of physical punishment in response to misbehavior. Corporal punishment has been associated with child abuse, aggression, delinquency, moral internalisation, antisocial behavior, mental health, and perpetration of the spouse and child abuse. This study explored the trends in corporal punishment among the three to eleven year old children due to they are the group age that is most likely to be subjected to corporal punishment
I also think that parents should have the punishments match the offenses and not have only one strategy of discipline. I am thankful for parents who know their limits when they are having a bad day and will find alternative methods of punishment so that they don’t become a statistic of abuse.
...Arkansas, the majority of the children being physically punished are minorities. Other than Texas, where there is a large Hispanic make-up with higher numbers than any other state, African American students show increasingly high numbers with being paddled. These pro corporal punishment states have granted leniency to districts that disagrees with this form of discipline. According to Durrant and Smith (2011) states are giving parents the option to opt-in or opt-out of allowing their children to submit to physical punishment. Albeit the 1980s and 1990s saw a decrease in pro corporal punishment states, only five states have banned it since then, Rhode Island in 220, Delaware in 2003, Pennsylvania in 2005, Ohio in 2009 and New Mexico in 2011. Donnelly and Straus (2005) suggest that the majority of the states left are in south and southwest areas of the country.
Growing up as children, from a very early stage in life we are taught by our parents and guardians to follow the simple rules set in the family setting as well as being respectful to everyone. As a child if one misbehaved or failed to live by the code of conduct, they ought to be disciplined in order to get back on track. Discipline simply meant to impart knowledge and skills. Many times however, discipline is mistaken for punishment and control and this poses a great challenge to parents on effective methods of instilling discipline in their children from one stage of life to the next for instance; how parents ought to discipline older children varies from the way they are required to handle toddlers.
If your family is like 90% of the population, then you have been disciplined using corporal punishment or have discipled your children with it. The topic of whether parents should use corporal punishment has been debated for years, and it is illegal in the United States to use physical punishment; however, each state’s law on corporal punishment varies and all allow some form of physical punishment. New studies greatly question whether corporal punishment should be used when discipling children. Parents or guardians should not be allowed to use corporal punishment because it causes anti-social behavior, it increases aggression, and it causes cognitive problems.
"Summary of Research on the Effects of Corporal Punishment." End Corporal Punishment. EndCorporalPunishment.org, Apr. 2013. Web. 12 May 2014. .
On a student’s cell phone, a teacher is caught hitting students with a thick stick. He continually hits everywhere from the students’ hips to the head harshly without a hesitation. This video is opened to the public by a student in the class posting it on the Internet. According to the other students, they were punished because they skipped class when the school inspectors came. All the people who looked at it on the Internet were surprised to see this kind of behavior. Recently, we’ve heard a lot on the media about punishment by teachers in school. Some people agree with the teacher’s power to punish, claiming that it is a part of education. However, contrary to this opinion, I disagree with corporal punishment because physical punishment brings only temporary effects in correcting children’s behavior. Also, it can humiliate a child by insulting his or her personality and have a poor affect on their self esteem. Besides, physical punishment can be abused because there aren’t any concrete standards to regulate how much punishment is proper in disciplining.
First, corporal punishment in public schools is barbaric because it can cause so much stress in a child who usually experiences this from bullying or child abuse. Brain scans display a structural and biochemical change that affects a child’s social behavior. For example, in an article written by Shen-Li Lee, argues that a “child’s anterior cingulated gyrus (ACG) suffers from cell loss, which affects a child’s ability to moderate and emphasize their fear.” Furthermore, the pathway to their brain is changed in ways that can affect their ability to manage stress, which can lead to the child being impulsive, and aggressive toward other people. In addition states that it “can cause impairment to the brain, which can lead to disorders such as ADHD, depression, impaired attention, etc.”
Any parent who has threatened to spank a child to modify behavior has observed the immediate change in demeanor. Psychologists tell us, however, that corporal punishment has no more of a desired effect on a child in the long term than alternative disciplinary methods such as a timeout or revoking privileges. Sweden proved that corporal punishment is no more effective than alternative methods and law enforcement officers are no more burdened by the laws put in place to protect the physical integrity of children. If in fact opponents and proponents are both right, their methods both work equally as well as the other, which one is the right one? Can they both be right? Unless we are going to make it legal to go around hitting each other for being snarky, rude, disrespectful, not paying attention, or just out of irritation due to undesirable behavior, the right thing to do is protect the most innocent of our kind. The right thing to do is give our children the same rights we give our family, friends, neighbors, and strangers. The moral thing to do is lead by example. The answer is
Allen: I do not think so. As I already mentioned, our teachers can use other methods to promote studies. Corporal punishment may hurt student’s dignity, which may cause lots of potential mental problems that will affect their future life.