Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of getting feedback when teaching
The importance of getting feedback when teaching
The importance of getting feedback when teaching
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of getting feedback when teaching
Midterms and Finals week have been coined “Hell Week” here at UW-Madison, and for
very good reasons. Many midterms fall in the same week or day, and every teacher has different
ideas on how to prepare their students for the exam. Another factor that stresses students out is
that some final grades are completely dependent on three exam grades, so bombing one is not an
option. What kinds of classes are best suited for a student to learn and thrive in? In the following,
I will explore grading fairness, a student’s willingness to take risks with grades, and how
students evaluate courses based on different factors.
In the article titled “The Effects of Grading and Teaching Practices on Students’
Perceptions of Grading Fairness,” Michael Gordon and Charles Hay start off by saying that there
is a lot of information about teachers’ perspective of grading, but very little information is given
on how the students perceive grading. When students reported on their classes, it was found that
they felt they were graded fair when teachers focused on prepping students for tests instead of
“manipulating” the final grade (Gordon and Hay, Pg. 93).
There are two different grade distribution rules. The first one is called meritocratic, and it
means that grades are distributed based on academic achievement. High ability students tend to
prefer this because it best portrays their knowledge. The second grade distribution rule is
particularistic, which means that grades are distributed based on personal circumstances, such as
the need to pass a class or problems in their lives that prevent them from getting their work done
adequately and on time. Low ability students tend to prefer this method as it is much more
forgivi...
... middle of paper ...
...mpared to a big lecture. In discussion, students should be
ready to be called on since the group is smaller, but one would not expect that in a lecture hall
where a student can be anonymous.
To test these theories out, there would need to be two classrooms of students learning the
same things, but each class would be structured differently. One class would be a lecture class,
and the other class would have lectures, discussions, and daily work to keep them involved.
Comparing grades and course evaluations at the end would determine which class seems to be
better suited to the needs of students. In the end, the majority of students just want to perform
well and understand the material. So, for the sake of final grades, students and teachers should
work closer together when it comes to covering the material and find ways to be more involved
in class.
Intelligence has begun to define individuals globally, but the goal of the minimum grading system is fairness and equality. Fair share grading is when all students in the class take an intended exam, but the class average score of the test is given to every student. Each student will receive the same grade even if one did better or worse than the average score. That being said it could reduce dropout rates, test anxiety, and competition between students. On the other hand, students could be affected negatively because it could lead to false self-value and unfairness to those students who study harder in order to earn higher grades. The debate continues about whether students should be separated by intelligence or be given equal grades in order
In other words, two teachers may give the same assignment two completely different grades based on their own grading style. This puts an incredible amount of stress on a student because they need to complete assignments that will satisfy their current teacher, whose expectations and grading style could be very similar or very different from the student’s previous teacher. Alfie Kohn believes that the influence grades have on a student’s life doesn’t help this situation, and may even make it worse by providing students with a false sense of security about their knowledge. In her article “From Degrading to De-grading”, she states that scores on tests can be largely based on how the test was written and what skills were tested (Kohn 240). Therefore, it is up to teachers to identify what topics students must master in order to be proficient and score well on standardized tests. But when the class is not structured with a consideration for the material used on such tests, students enter the test blind to the skills that they will be expected to know and use. Anyone can memorize a list of facts off a study guide and score well on a multiple choice test the next day, but skills such as analyzing literature and interpreting a handful of graphs containing data from a scientific experiment are skills that require time and hours of instruction to master.
In “What is a Grade” by Pat Belanoff, she explains the pros and cons of the grading system. In Pats ' essay she states “Perhaps the solution would to abandon grading altogether in writing class. I confess that this a solution that appeals to me greatly.” (151). Grades should not be present in the way we test students’ learning ability.
In today’s society we feel the need to be graded in order to learn. The topic of the grading system has sparked three essays, by three different authors, about the pros and cons of the grading system. First, Jerry Farber, professor at University of California at San Diego, wrote A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System (333). Next is Steven Vogel, professor at Denison University, who wrote Grades and Money (337). The last two authors in this compilation are Stephen Goode and Timothy W. Maier. They both are journalists for Insight on the News. While each of these authors have their own point of view on the grading system, all three essays talk about how being graded affects learning.
higher than previously assigned for given levels of achievement.” This means that grades are designed to recognize various levels of success, making them an important aspect of the education system in countries across the globe. They help determine not only where students are accepted, but help students earn scholarship dollars to aid students in paying for their education. However, there has been a rapid increase in the amount of A’s awarded to students in America to help those trying to get into and pay for college rather than earning A’s for the content of their work. There is a huge difference between the number of A’s given to students in America and
In conclusion, I believe that the grade system is important to the success of the students so can know where they stand in a course as far as grades are concern, and they are able to motivate themselves to light their grades up higher than before as well as the Instructors can see where students need help and they can play an important role in a students career as far as them knowing what areas they need assisting in so they might succeed.
As a mother of three students and me being a student, it is evident that our current grading system is no longer efficient. The grading system that once might have worked is no longer an effective means of measure in the 21st Century. For us to overlook the thoughts of a new improved way of grading or evaluating students, only restrains our ability to put into place something more current and something more efficient. Something that could perhaps empower our students to perform at greater levels, or something that could perhaps embolden our students to want to learn. Relying on the traditional way of grading, can actually be more harmful than helpful when it comes to empowering our students and calculating or measuring their growth.
overcome by the time of a test. Students who suffer from this often get very
It is fairly manifest that many students are falling behind their course and become dreadful as they see exact and somehow ruthless number that represents what they’ve earned. However, as they repent by realizing the reality of their educational productivity, it could enhance their flaw and be motivational from what they’ve experienced in the past. Present day’s social structure is dearly depending on the hierarchy and this new born grading policy doesn’t seem to be fit in ...
students do not perform to the best of their potential. Often times, students only do
Mark W. Durm stated that, “it was not until 1792 that Cambridge University implemented the GPA and started the legitimate grading system” (2). In the 18th century, teachers were paid based on the sizes of their classrooms. Over time, the grading policy adapted to lessen teacher’s workloads, allowing them to have bigger classes. Due to this structure, the students’ success became less important than the grading system. The system used before the GPA was more advantageous than the newly implemented system. For example, more students interacted with each other, causing the students to learn important communication skills. The students’ level of friendly competition and understanding in the classroom was enough for the teacher to grasp that the students understood the material (gpa-calculator.us). The GPA grading system changed learning because it made grading easier for teachers to assign points and a grade, rather than making sure the students understood the concepts. This is why students today solely obsess over getting an ‘A’, rather than appreciating how to obtain knowledge for the sake of individual growth and understanding. By the 20th century, most schools in the United States had conformed to the GPA grading system and introduced a whole new structure of
Grade inflation arose from observations ,why because based on statistics the primary concern is that the distribution of the grades has change it is the primary concern because everyone
Teachers have always used grades to measure the amount a student has learned. This practice is becoming ineffective. Many students have a wide range of grades, which show that grades may not show what a student really knows. Therefore, the standard grading system should be replaced. Some reasons why grades should be replaced are bad grades can hinder a child’s performance, grades define who a student is in the classroom, and grades are not an effective way to see if students have learned the material. The current grading system should be upgraded and every school should incorporate the plus/minus system in their method of grading.
By nature, most students are brought up in an academic environment motivated to get A’s and B’s on their report cards. Those grades sometimes don’t thoroughly report how much a student has learned or gained knowledge in each topic. Some instructors throw in factors totally unrelated to learning, when the main objective of academic institutions is to learn. In order to clearly demonstrate how much a student has learned in the classroom, schools should change their current grading system and teach students how to learn.
Grading is very important in a student’s life. Countless of schools, colleges, and universities have begun to change the way they view and assess student scores. Glenbard North High School is among them. Within recent times, there has been a petition in motion for changing from the standard A, B, C, D and F grading system to the plain pass/fail system.While the pass/fail system has its advantages, the standard grading system shows that it is clearly the best way to measure the understanding of a student.