Hamlet's Reasons for Delaying the Killing of the King in Shakespeare's Hamlet

2133 Words5 Pages

Hamlet's Reasons for Delaying the Killing of the King in Shakespeare's Hamlet

A. Revenge tragedies have captivated audiences worldwide long before

the time of Shakespeare. In reality Hamlet - supposedly a Shakespeare

original - has its roots in the celebrated Danish story of Amleth from

the twelfth Century. Critics have also drawn many conclusions that

'Hamlet' was a re-make or Shakespeare's version of Thomas Kyd's famous

'The Spanish Tragedy'.

Like 'The Spanish Tragedy' and the many other revenge tragedies of

that time, Hamlet too consisted of the stock conventions of revenge

tragedies like the ghost, the crime done in secret, the

play-within-the-play, a male lead who stimulates madness and a heroine

who goes mad and commits suicide. Yet there was and is something very

different about the tale of 'Hamlet'. This play has managed to keep

audiences and critics alike questioning themselves and the world

around them. Hamlet's delay in the killing of the King is another

aspect that make 'Hamlet' one of the most intriguing plays that

explore human nature.

Revenge tragedies, especially the ones about murder were extremely

popular with the Elizabethan audience. This was more or less because

they were forbidden to commit revenge, let alone murder, in their

lives. The church forbade it and it was silently agreed upon that if

the revenge seeker pursued his aim then he must die too. This is why

all the revenge tragedies of that time concluded with the protagonist

dying.

To me it seems as if Hamlet has been continually delaying avenging his

father's murder. Ideas of mere procrastination surface when Hamlet is

compared to the young Pr...

... middle of paper ...

... last scene. Some critics even

believe that he only did manage to kill the King at the end because

the King poisoned his mother. He took revenge for his mother's, not

father's murder. There are many justifications for Hamlet's delay and

they can be interpreted into whether he was just procrastinating or

whether they were truly understandable basis for delay. In conclusion

I feel that Hamlet delays the King's murder because of his own

character. If he were more like Laertes or Fortinbras the play could

have had a different conclusion. But his character - or rather his

mind - stood in the way even when he had many an opportunity to kill

Claudius. External events might not fully contribute to Hamlet's delay

but can be - and perhaps were - used as a reason or an excuse to

further delay avenging his father's murder. [IMAGE]

Open Document