Hamlet Ambiguity

1166 Words3 Pages

A simple pendulum hangs in equilibrium until it is raised by an external force; this movement is perpetuated under gravity until another force ceases its movement. However, if another pendulum is added, a compound pendulum is crafted. One which is defined by its chaotic motion highly sensitive to its initial conditions. Equally, enclosed within William Shakespeare’s Hamlet lies one of the greatest entanglements of literature. Yet, it is still questioned whether a play submerged in ambiguity can be abridged to an encompassing single word and still express Hamlet’s absoluteness and amplitude. It is within the multitude of interpretations and ideations surrounding Hamlet a pattern can be found. Within Hamlet’s excessive engagement with philosophical …show more content…

Hamlet’s brain forms a pendulum constantly swinging back and forth, Shakespeare's adept scholarly characterisation plagues Hamlet with a deep conflict, torn between the demands of his emotions and the inherit skepticism of his mind; two extremes of himself. His diction littered with binary opposites at his introduction, “A little more than kin, and less than kind.”(Act 1 Scene 1) showcases his inability to weigh towards one side despite the emotional conflict and resentment, he needs to counterbalance. Even when contemplating the very existence of his “too too solid flesh” Shakespeare employs synecdoche amplifying Hamlet’s profound melancholia as not only his flesh but he wholey “would melt / Thaw and resolve itself into a dew!” (Act 1 Scene 2). The immediate juxtaposition referring to the “Everlasting” highlights the duality of life and death as his physical and mental presence seeps into the spiritual. Everything …show more content…

In this sense couldn’t Hamlet’s mind be compared to a pendulum of perpetual motion? We see his masterful antic disposition fool and his conscious switch between sanity or feigned insanity. The nature of his predisposed path becomes apparent with the weight of his father passing and mother swiftly advancing on. The crafting of an explicitly cold reply in addressing his mother “madam” distances himself , “I shall in all my best obey you”(Act 1, Scene 2) poses an implicit testimony to the responsibility he feels towards his late father. However, his intrinsic grief and act of madness becomes blurred as he is hypnotised with seeking out information. Introspective meta-theatrical models framework this seeking out, Shakespeare highlighting the power of theater and acting. Hamlet’s melancholy seeps in through Shakespeare’s motif of comparison between the player and Hamlet. Deepening Hamlet’s agitated state; the exclamation “For Hecuba!”(Act 2, Scene 2) consciously breaking tempo of the iambic pentameter by the heavy cesura. Hamlet acts out the extremities “between feigned and actual madness and between rational and mad suicide, distinctions that the culture was gradually establishing” as Carol Neely explored. This actual madness is within Hamlet's melancholy as it was known as such in the Elizabethan era. Shakespeare utilises Claudius’ insightful and cautious characterisation to recognise this

Open Document