Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Government regulation of the internet
Government controlled internet
Government control of the internet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Government regulation of the internet
The U.S. government monitoring internet content does have some benefits in the long run, but it some cases it may just be a little too much. In some cases, us at citizens give the government the value and approval to observe over our interactions or circumstances with the internet. For instance think about any app you have downloaded or anything you have subscribed to before. When you first start using an app or website it always asks for you to agree to their terms of service and if you do not agree with them you normally can not use it. Companies across the U.S. such as Apple have an agreement with the government looking over certain data that they receive. The government has requests to obtain information such as financial identifier, account …show more content…
citizens are not performing any unlawful acts by this as stated under the First Amendment which grants the freedom of speech. Although using apps like Facebook or Instagram are nice and a great way to announce your freedom, there are some cases where sharing your thoughts is a crime. If you happen to violate your freedom of speech by posing threats towards any other citizen, you are breaking your protections under freedom of speech. It then is the government_Ñés job to overlook and observe the consequences to ensure that your citizens are remaining safe. They are in charge to take stand and not just let any threats pass over the internet without being sure that safety is in place. There are, in some cases, instances where the government should not be able to have the duty in monitoring internet content. The Fourth Amendment states that the government can not perform unreasonable searches upon citizens that are deemed under the law. If the government is monitoring internet content for no reason it would breach this amendment causing the observation to be unlawful and unreasonable. If you ask me the government should have the duty in monitoring internet content when there appears to be a threat marked against the country or its
...rk with us. This can have a major impact on the economy, and may eventually lead to a weakened nation overall. However, it can be argued that the United States is not acting hypocritical through mass surveillance over the internet. While there's some overlap of the issues, the existence of surveillance does not cut off the freedom of speech on the Internet."One can recognize... there is a very large difference between censorship and spying... On some level, we know that spying and espionage is going to take place. This still doesn't mean we promote censorship." (Verveer, 2013) Undoubtedly, the censorship by the agency over the internet may make users think twice about what opinions to express, but as long as no major crimes are being planned, then the agency will not really care about what is said online, and internet users are free to say whatever they would like.
Government seems to take away more privacy than they say they protect. In 1984 the citizens were constantly being monitored no matter where they were, there was no escape. "It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away" (Orwell 62). Members of the party were constantly being monitored, at even the slight sign of disloyalty they would be apprehended by the Thought Police, striking fear into the people. People had no privacy due to the government and this can now be seen today. Referring to the NSA "The agency has circumvented or cracked much of the encryption, or digital scrambling, that guards global commerce and banking systems, protects sensitive data like trade secrets and medical records, and automatically secures the e-mails, Web searches, Internet chats and phone calls of Americans and others around the world"(Lopez np). Growing use of internet and technology makes it easier for the government to spy on us. Like in 1984 they will soon be able to track our every move. There is no way to completely remove ourselves from technology, there's are steps to take to protect privacy. A solution is to keep more records on paper instead of online. Also, what is posted on social networks should be limited. The less information you give them, the less the government knows.
Edward Snowden is America’s most recent controversial figure. People can’t decide if he is their hero or traitor. Nevertheless, his leaks on the U.S. government surveillance program, PRISM, demand an explanation. Many American citizens have been enraged by the thought of the government tracing their telecommunication systems. According to factbrowser.com 54% of internet users would rather have more online privacy, even at the risk of security (Facts Tagged with Privacy). They say it is an infringement on their privacy rights of the constitution. However, some of them don’t mind; they believe it will help thwart the acts of terrorists. Both sides make a good point, but the inevitable future is one where the government is adapting as technology is changing. In order for us to continue living in the new digital decade, we must accept the government’s ability to surveil us.
Undeniably, there is reasoning behind a watchful government. After 9/11, anti-terrorism acts were in high gear and legislators passed the Patriot Act, which increased the amount of surveillance powers that the government held (Savage para 1). It makes sense; a country shaken by terrorism would live fearfully without the comfort of the government eavesdropping on other possibly dangerous plots; the same goes for countries that are often affected by terrorism. The surveillance can deny criminals access to communication and prevent terrorist plots (Eijkman 139), This explains why after 9/11, Americans were practically begging for more surveillance (Savage para 1). Now that America is in a state of recovery and relaxation, there is absolute uproar over the NSA and other government surveillance agencies.
The NSA and U.S. government sifting through our private information is but a small inconvenience that we must sacrifice in order to protect our own freedom and safety. Domestic Surveillance roots back to the 1910’s, where the assassination of President McKinley, created a Bureau of Investigation that would trace the efforts of the Communists attempting an uprising in America. This would be the foundings behind Domestic Surveillance in America, and would continue on after World War II where the government created the NSA and CIA, with the main purposes
Domestic Surveillance: Is domestic surveillance worth the hassle? In 2013, whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed to the American people that the National Security Agency had been spying on them. Not only that, but also on world leaders. Domestic surveillance is understood as the first line of defense against terrorism, but it has many downsides, not only it violates Americans lives, also it spies on our social media, it puts a fine line on their privacy, and it is a big stab at the freedom of speech. According to John W. Whitehead, “The fact that the government can now, at any time, access entire phone conversations, e-mail exchanges, and other communications from months or years past should frighten every American.”
Whether the U.S. government should strongly keep monitoring U.S. citizens or not still is a long and fierce dispute. Recently, the debate became more brutal when technology, an indispensable tool for modern live, has been used by the law enforcement and national security officials to spy into American people’s domestic.
The government — they are watching everything you do. For many people, they would think that saying phrases like this would make someone look like a crazy or some kind of conspiracy theorist. Though it turns out that these statements are true in a sense that the many governments and not just the U.S. are surveilling its own citizens and other people around the world by tracking and recording their phone calls, e-mails, and other communications. The main way this came into the light is the recent and ongoing controversy with the NSA and leaks from whistleblowers like Edward Snowden. These revelations are raising doubts in people’s minds and they are wanting to make change or reform to the government(s). Through this revelation, made by the help of whistleblowers and news sources, there are questions on what caused this agency to get started, how are they operating, what do they know, what is causing so much attention to this specific current event, and what is driving people to demand change and reform.
The role of the Federal Government is to provide a safe environment for its citizens by any means necessary, continue the integrity of the culture by abiding by the constitution, and generate a continuous flow of revenue to maintain a fully functional society. In today’s society, surveillance is easy to accomplish due to the technologies available to the citizens, such as camera phones, cameras on laptops, the internet, land line phones or even swiping your bank card. All of these forms of technology are used for personal benefit, however, are the means in which the government uses to monitor its citizens. The National Security Agency (NSA) is the main producer of domestic surveillance and is the largest U.S. intelligence organization that appears under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense. The NSA is responsible for not only domestic but global monitoring, collection, decoding, translation and analyzing information and data that may target the United States soil.
The way modern societies technology has evolved is not just by the government. In the article, Our surveillance society: What Orwell And Kafka might say, by alan Greenblatt, he states, “ the federal government has a direct pipeline into Verizon, Google, Yahoo, and other such companies, those companies would control huge amounts of information about americans on their own it is not just the corporations performing surveillance.” These sources gather information about the person who is online and sell your basic information to
A person may believe having the government oversee internet content is unconstitutional, because it contradicts this amendment seen in The Constitution of the United States, but in all honesty, it does not. By doing this, government officials and law enforcement could stop crime before it occurs; protecting the lives of Americans. For instance, it was 2008 in the sun-filled city of Orlando, Florida. A woman named Casey Anthony, had a daughter named Cayley Anthony, she was two years old. She was later found murdered, and prosecutors believed she had been suffocated to death, but the cause of death was never truly concluded. Casey Anthony went on trial, but she was found not guilty in the year of 2011. However, in 2012, detectives on the case realized they overlooked Casey’s web search for “ fool proof suffocation”, and that she clicked on an article about suicide, taking poison, and placing a bag over one’s head. No one really knew if it was Casey searching for those specifics on the computer, but the action
The government gives each American citizen a set of unalienable rights that protect them from the government’s power. These rights cannot be broken, yet the government violates the Fourth Amendment daily to find ways to spy on the American public under the guise of protecting against terrorism. In 2007 President Obama said the American administration “acts like violating civil liberties is the way to enhance our securities – it is not.” Americans need to understand that their privacy is worth the fight. The people need to tell their neighbors, their congressmen, and their senators that they will not allow their internet privacy to be violated by needless spying. American citizens deserve the rights given to them and need to fight for the right to keep them by changing privacy laws to include Internet privacy.
However, government agencies, especially in America, continue to lobby for increased surveillance capabilities, particularly as technologies change and move in the direction of social media. Communications surveillance has extended to Internet and digital communications. law enforcement agencies, like the NSA, have required internet providers and telecommunications companies to monitor users’ traffic. Many of these activities are performed under ambiguous legal basis and remain unknown to the general public, although the media’s recent preoccupation with these surveillance and privacy issues is a setting a trending agenda.
First of all, freedom of speech on social media. Social media is strongly developing nowadays. On social media, free speech is everywhere. Noel Diem demonstrates “it is a way for some people to vent their anger without feeling self-conscious, nervous, or upset without resorting to violent actions” (3). Americans feel free to speak out their opinions and feelings at everywhere, even on social media. Everyone can acknowledge that people might
On social media, each individual has the power to be influential and important. There is a freedom of expression on social media that we are allowed to express. A user on Facebook can post anything they want or anything they want for free.... ... middle of paper ... ...