Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on thomas friedman the world is flat
A short research paper on Milton Friedman
Critical review of milton friedman
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on thomas friedman the world is flat
The question has been asked whether Thomas Friedman or William Duiker was correct in their opinions about globalization and fragmentation. It appears that both authors are correct and their reasons are interconnected. If the world has become closer because of the economic markets and the internet, than it makes the debate that the world is flat relevant (William Duiker, 2010).
Thomas Friedman says that technology is equalizing the playing fields between wealthy and impoverished countries. With other countries catching up and even mastering technology in some instances, it allows to them to play on the same fields as the United States and other super powers. The telephone and computer industries have advanced tremendously and have countries like China and India into the global market as fierce competitors. Friedman calls this the leveling or flattening of the universe because of the abilities to invent and create a demand that brings in revenue that can change a countries outlook from being third world (poor) or a nation on the rise (Thomas Friedman, 2006)
According to Friedman, globalization has played a significant part in the shrinking landscape of the world and it makes international things appear more national or local. This began about thirty years back but gained traction after 911. Globalization has elevated the global modernization of living swifter than that at any other time in the history of the world, and it is supporting amazing economic growth (Thomas Friedman, 2006).
Friedman also uses a term called glocalization-where cultures infuse foreign ideas and better global practices with their own traditions to insure an enhanced form of living. Countries that open and willing to change are said ...
... middle of paper ...
...make relevant points. In an ideal world Thomas Friedman would be absolutely correct with technology bridging the gap between all societies, but we have run into set-backs as William Duiker suggested. In the world today we are experiencing economic melt downs amongst almost all of our developed nations, including the United States. The WTO has made it easier for trade and outsourcing of jobs and it has also contributed economic decline with loss of jobs. This could be the Clash of Civilization because it could throw developed nations back into poverty if we don’t have the resources to take care of ourselves.
Works Cited
Duiker, William J. Contemporary World History. 5th ed. Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2010. Print.
Friedman, Thomas L. The World Is Flat: a Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006. Print.
As Americans we have to start to comprehend that the world around us is changing technologically, politically, and economically. In “The Last Superpower” an excerpt from the book The Post American World by Fareed Zakaria published in 2008. Zakaria emphasizes on these changes. Thomas Friedman the author of “The World is Flat” a piece from the book The World is Flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century published in 2005 also emphasizes on the same changes currently happening in the world. Zakaria and Friedman define these changes as globalization. The obvious common ground shared by both authors is their representation of globalization and the effects that it has and will continue to have on modern life. In contrast to sharing the same main topic both authors take a drastically different approach on how the relay their information to the audience. The differences displayed are mainly due to their personal and educational backgrounds, definitions of globalization as well as the individual writing styles of each author.
“Our Future Selves” by Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen construct views on countries’ technologies that changes the world on a daily basis. Conversely, technologies reconstruct countries in various simpler ways to live throughout economic trends. Furthermore, the quality of life is massively changing with new technologies. Consequently, wealthy countries are viewed differently from poor countries towards technological advantages. Ordinarily, technologies have made the difficult obstacles so much easier than just by hand. Industries have utilized the advanced technologies to provide huge manufacturing productivity. Moreover, Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen have some very compelling reservations within their article, “Our Future Selves”, on the trends
Arguments supporting the "flat world theory" come mainly from Friedman. His argument rests on the assumption of ten flatteners and a triple convergence. Friedman says that the power of new information technology has helped bring the world closer together and has made it more interconnected and interdependent (Friedman, 2005). More people now have access to this technological platform for education, innovation and entrepreneurship (Friedman, 2005). However, Florida (2005, p.51) argues that this flat playing field mainly affects the advanced countries, which see not only manufacturing work but also higher-end jobs. Other developing or undeveloped countries simply do not have the luxury of this connection and are left out of this technological platform. Florida (2005, p.51) contends that “...there are more insidious tensions among the world’s growing peaks, sinking valleys, and shifting hills”. This inequality is growing across the world and within countries.
Constant change and a flat, global competitive market landscape were described by Thomas Friedman, author of The World is Flat, as triple convergence and was a result of the ten flatteners. Friedman also stated that in “Globalization 1.0, countries had to think globally. In Globalization 2.0, companies had to think globally to thrive, or at least survive. In Globalization 3.0, individuals have to think globally to thrive, or at least survive.” (Friedman, 2007) The concept of needing individuals to think globally and thrive in the market led Friedman to travel and report on various educational cultures across the world. Friedman was determined to find “the right stuff” to make the youth in future generations competitive globally.
The phrase: "the world is flat" can be interpreted in many ways. Basically what Friedman means by "flat" is "linked." The falling of trade and political barriers and technical advances have made it possible to do business, instantaneously with billions of other people around the world. It has allowed for parts of the world, which had previously been cut off, like China and India, to successfully compete in the world market. Thus, the playing field is being leveled, and no one nation has an advantage. Friedman could also refer to a "flat world" in a metaphorical sense. In a spherical earth you cannot see around the world and cannot recognize the opportunities far from where you live. If the world were flat you could see it all. There would be no barriers to get in your way. This is the equivalent to a smaller globe which allows one to reach far away opportunities.
When the term “Globalization” is discussed, most academics, scholars, professionals and intellectuals attempt to define and interpret it in a summarized fashion. My main concern with this approach is that one cannot and should not define a process that altered decades of history and continues to, in less than 30 words. Global Shift is a book with remarkable insight. Peter Dicken rather than attempting to define the commonly misused word, explains Globalization in a clear and logical fashion, which interconnects numerous views. Dicken takes full advantage of his position to write and identify the imperative changes of political, economic, social, and technological dimensions of globalization.
. . ] from more different corners of the planet and on a more equal footing than at any previous time in the history of the world”(8). Friedman details that the world was flattened by 10 distinct events or “flatteners” that brought the world closer together and made the global economy more accessible to those in lesser developed countries or ones less prevalent on the global stage in the 19/20th centuries. The flatteners have helped equalize “access to information - it has no class boundaries, few education boundaries, few linguistic boundaries, and virtually no monetary boundaries”(185). The flatteners including, the rise of the internet, offshoring, and outsourcing, and workflow software have revolutionized how the US interacts with the world as well as how we as individuals interact globally with others. Friedman also discusses how because the world is flat, a new, higher standard of “normal” must be defined.
Globalization is a broad concept and the angle taken to define it can lead us to interpret the idea in many different ways. There is much controversy about what globalization actually means and many definitions fail to encompass social, cultural and technological exchanges between world systems. John Pilger suggests that "it is a jargon term which journalists and politicians have made fashionable which is often used in a positive sense to denote a 'Global village' of free trade, hi-tech marvels and all kinds of possibilities that transcend class, historical experience and ideology." (J.Pilger 1998:63). Taking a broader point of view, Bilton et al defines globalization as "The process whereby political, social, economic and cultural relations increasingly take on a global scale, and which has profound consequences for individuals, local experiences and everyday lives."
...in the new “flat world” individuals need to figure out how to become “untouchable.” He explains that “untouchables are people whose jobs cannot be outsourced, digitized, or automated” (184). He explains that in a “flat world” there is no longer a job based solely on geographic, but rather in most cases an available job “will go to the best, smartest, most productive or cheapest worker-wherever he or she resides” (183). He goes on to show that companies and individuals have to look at the global picture today in order to succeed (183).
The paper focuses on the increased complexity of globalized organizations and methods of altering the process within the structure. Business and environment change constantly to sustain development in emerging markets and increase efficiency. Integration of relationships and processes of the world systems, help to manage local, regional and planetary balance to manage duplication of success become conceivable. The retail giant Wal-Mart exhibits its ability to transform the organization asynchronously with the increase integration of globalization.’ Wal-Mart unveils the type of integration possible between globalization, and business services as it adapts, eliminating redundancies and repetitive movement. It observes the effect and influence, propagated on business through it use of supply chains, and influence.
After the cold war, word ‘globalization’ was commonly used at a time of unprecedented interconnectedness when advanced nations experienced a ruthless development by exploiting energy resources and stressing culture forms in developing countries. To identify the definition of ‘globalization’, it is significant to clarify its appearance as well as implication.
The expression "globalization" is generally utilized as a part of business rings and matters of trade and profit to depict the expanding internationalization of businesses for merchandise and administrations, the budgetary framework, companies and commercial ventures, innovation, and rivalry. In the globalized economy, partitions and national points of confinement have liberally diminished with the departure of tangles to market access. Furthermore, there have been decreases in transaction expenses and layering of time and separation in global transactions.
The book, The World is Flat, by Thomas Friedman draws attention to some very good points concerning globalization and the world economy today. Friedman emphasizes the status of America today in relation to the other countries of the world. As I looked at the things in which he warned about or highlighted, I realized the importance of this issue. He talks about a few aspects in which need to be kept competitive in order for America to retain their current standing in the world market.
The term ‘Globalization’ refers to the integration of economies, industries, markets, cultures and policy-making around the globe. It explains a progression by which both national and regional economies, societies, and cultures have become incorporated through the universal system of commerce, communication, migration and transportation. Globalization can be explained in economic and sociological contexts. Malcolm Waters, in his book– ‘Globalization’ writes that “Globalization is a social process in which the constraints of geography on economic, political, social and cultural arrangements recede, in which people become increasingly aware that they are receding and in which people act accordingly.” Whereas, Nobel laureate and economist Joseph Stiglitz in his book ‘Globalization and Its Discontents’ says that ”Globalization is the closer integration of the countries and peoples of the world.brought about by the enormous reduction of costs of transportation and communication, and the breaking down of people across the borders."
Larsson, Thomas. The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization. Cato Institute, 2001.