Comparing Heroic Traits: Gilgamesh and Beowulf

560 Words2 Pages

As the protagonists of two old—but distinct—epics, Gilgamesh and Beowulf both have much in common, and much that sets them apart. Gilgamesh is known for being “two-thirds divine and one-third human” (Gilgamesh 71; I); he is a “man of unsurpassable courage and inexhaustible energy” (“Introduction” 10). From this, it can be gathered that Gilgamesh is clearly a man who is rarely surpassed by others. His bravery and relentlessness make him a god amongst the people, and his citizens continually hold him to that standard. Because of his noble personality, Gilgamesh deems himself worthy to fight the monster Humbaba. However, he relies on a decent amount of assistance to do so. Gilgamesh has the companionship of Enkidu during his travels and skirmishes, and …show more content…

This is not truly an issue for Beowulf, as he has the bravery and strength to defeat Grendel alone. This is different from Gilgamesh’s approach in the fact that Beowulf is completely alone; all he has to depend on is his Wyrd and his might, both of which could work against him. On the other hand, Beowulf is still quite similar to Gilgamesh in the aspect of his dedication. Beowulf is “grieved [...] sore / [t]hat the man beast himself [the Danes] may not see” (Gilgamesh lines 35-36). He is upset with himself because he was not able to display the fact he killed Grendel, and he remains dedicated to doing so. After fifty years, he defeats Grendel’s mother, permitting him “[to take] / [...] Grendel’s head” (Beowulf lines 586-587). This proves Beowulf’s devotion, and it is almost as extreme as that of Gilgamesh. Though it is ultimately for different reasons, the two characters are fueled by their ambitions and define nobleness. Gilgamesh and Beowulf are the true definitions of a hero, and this comes through in the similarities and differences in their

Open Document