Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
To what extent do genes influence behavior essay
How does genetics affect behavior
How does genetics affect behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: To what extent do genes influence behavior essay
Genes and Their Control Over Humans
' They (genes) are in you and me; they created us, body and mind'
This statement by Richard Dawkins poses the question of how much and
in what way our genes control us, whether they are responsible for our
hereditary features only, or for all behavior and environmental
aspects of our persona.
A reductionist view implies that only specific tasks are carried out
by the genes.We know that most genes synthesize for proteins, these
being chains of sub units, or amino acids (a.a) which in turn form the
bases of RNA ( ribonucleic acid) to determine the sequence of the a.a
by means of the genetic code. This process dictates whether the
protein made will become part of the structure of an organism, or an
enzyme for the production of a chemical change or reaction.
An holistic view would present with argument that our genes are not
just involved in biological processes, but can affect and be affected
by our lifestyle and environmental and social influences.
With these two views in mind, it is necessary to determine which
viewpoint Dawkins is following. Although the study of genetics has
been developed enormously over the years, we have still not totally
reached any conclusion on how genes specifically work and how far they
contribute to the creation of all traits.
1
Darwin introduced us to his principles of evolution in his book, ' On
the origin of the species.' In this he argued that the present-day
species evolved from a simpler life-form by the process of Natural
Selection. His evidence for this was from the variability to be found
within populations. What he was unable to prove, ...
... middle of paper ...
...-thinking' organisms. On this basis, they should be
able to self-correct any inconsistencies of hereditry. This does not
happen, our environment and social issues are also contributory
factors, therefore we must conclude that Dawkins' theory cannot be
from an holistic viewpoint.
4
Surely with all the interaction that takes place, within an organism,
there shows an interdependency of all parts of an organisms entire DNA
(deoxyribonucleic acid) componants.
The amino acid sequence, those that dictate structure or enzyme
formation, and not just the genes themselves, are the determining
factor and, it could be said, is what leads to the creation of body
and mind. Therefore, the organism as a whole, its environment and
behaviour patterns, in tandem with its genes, must be considered in
their entirety.
Technological advancement drives human society to change as it itself expands through research into the unknown. Often, new ideas exhibit a threat to the ancient fundamentals of society, leading to a protest of many remarkable innovations. In the study of biology, theorists have begun to propose change at a microscopic level, which will have a profound effect on society: genetically modifying the human species. Gregory Stock addresses the future of this concept in his book, Redesigning Humans. Using metaphor to enhance the journey into the future, substance to present the immense possibilities biological modification will introduce, and appeal to pathos to create fear and excitement, Stock argues that the rebirth of humanity is certain and the world should accept the change.
In this essay I will discuss why I do not agree with Richard Dawkins and will prove this by using the theory of Intelligent Design as to why I do not agree with him. The Intelligent Design Theory says that intelligent causes are necessary to explain the complicated structures of biology, and that these causes are analytically evident. Certain biological features defy the random-chance explanation because they appear to have been designed. Since design logically requires an intelligent designer, the appearance of design means there is evidence for a designer. I will be discussing the following three arguments in the Intelligent Design Theory: • Irreducible complexity • Specified complexity • The anthropic principle.
Every individual has a biological influence on their development; two individuals combine their genetic information to create a new organism, carrying biological predispositions that will shape their expressed behaviors and characteristics. However, Susan Griffin, author of the essay “Our Secret,” argues that while genetic influences are significant, they are not the sole contributors to an individual’s development. Throughout her essay, Griffin reveals to her readers that the presence of external, uncontrollable factors from an individual’s environment can be equally influential as they diverge the individual off of the predetermined path of life created by biological factors.
The study of the causes of substance abuse has been conflicting many people for a long time. There are two causes of substance abuse that have been argued for many years. The first cause is believed to be environmental. The second cause is a genetic cause that leads people to turn to drugs and alcohol. In “Touch of Grey” Lanthrop comes to the conclusion that his substance abuse issue posses both genetic and environmental causes. This argument is specifically compelling because he uses research and a personal statement to prove his findings. While environmental issues have a large impact on substance abuse, genetics have the greatest impact on substance abuse.
...empt to impute the difficulty of imagining evolutionary pathways to the critic. The only difference is that Dawkins' version is more aggressively ad hominem. However, the fault does not lie in the critic but in the Continuum Argument. It is not the critic's job to imagine evolutionary pathways; it is the believer's job to demonstrate them without resorting to just-so stories. The philosopher David Hume once argued that we can imagine rabbits coming into existence out of nowhere, and he concluded from this that there is nothing contradictory in the notion that something can come from nothing. Now we certainly can form a mental image of rabbits coming from nowhere, as we can for the transformation of a lensless eye to a lensed eye or a steam engine to a warp engine, but we are not obliged to accept a necessary connection between our mental images and external reality.
As a mother, I am shocked and dismayed by the general acceptance of the myth of genetic determinism. One's environment, including people one interacts with, has an undeniable influence on how one develops. Nonetheless, many scientists disregard the impact of environment on one's intelligence. I do not deny that one's biology is a crucial part of one's identity. Inheritance of physical traits is obvious. Children often look "just like" their father or mother, or another relative. One's genes determine eye and hair color, height and body build. I believe, however, that what makes us human is not something that can be found in...
Inheritance, by Sharon Moalem, is a nonfiction novel that elaborates on what makes us who we are and why. Moalem states that even before we are born, our genes set up determines our lives. Our genes are adaptable sequences that can be altered by instances of trauma, simple dietary change, or just a small indiscretion. Through our experiences, our genes are changing and consequently limiting us. We have an unwavering predictable matter of the genes we have inherited from previous generations. Our future children could inherit many of our specific genes, good or bad. Even if our inherited
Evolutionary theory is developed from Darwin’s argument that “suggests that a process of natural selection leads to the survival of the fittest and the development of traits that enable a species to adept to its environment. “ Many have taken this a step further by saying that our genetic inheritance determines not only our physical traits but also certain personality traits and social behaviors. There is such a controversy over significant behaviors that unfold because many believe that we are already pre-programmed human species. It has also been argued that evolution is reflected in functioning and structure of the nervous system and that is has evolutionary factors that have a significant influence on everyday behavior. With what is being said means that if we follow the evolutionary theory, then it would be said that we are already pre-programmed from before birth to follow certain protocols in life. Whether it is from finding a mate or by getting a job. It also believed that this theory gives use cues from our own system to follow, providing us with certain aspects of life from our ancestors. By believing in this theory we can determine that the importance of heredity when influencing human behavior. Behavioral geneticists and evolutionary psychologists have both agreed that not only do genetic factors provide specific behaviors or traits but it also shows the limitations on the emergence of such traits or behaviors. What this means is that our genetics will determine how tall we will be to how ...
Gregor Mendel was an Austrian monk who revolutionized our understanding and perception of genetics. Mendel’s experiments in his monastery garden provided future geneticists with the basic principles of hereditary through the experimentation in both hybrid and pure bred pea plants, which he found to follow specific patterns in their offspring. The choice to use peas was because of their distinct varieties and their ability to produce offspring quickly and the ability to easily regulate fertilization simply with the use of a paintbrush. When conducting these experiments Before Mendel Pea Plant Experimentation it was commonly accepted that a child’s genetic traits were simply half from the mother and half from the father. This evidence was supported by experiments were generally conducted over a short period of time resulting in skewed and unreliable data, whereas Mendel’s experiments were conducted over an eight year period involving tens of thousands of plants. Two of Mendel’s traits that he focused on were the texture of the seed pod. E.g. smooth and round or wrinkled. In the first generation of these plants 100% of the pea plants possessed the Smooth and round texture. On the second generation of the pea plants of every 4 pea plants 3 posessed the smooth trait and a singular pea plant produced wrinkled seeds. Upon the review of his results Mendel concluded that characteristics could be expressed through dominant and recessive traits. The Dominant trait masks or completely covers the recessive, whereas a recessive gene is an allele that is only present in a homozygous genotype. Through Mendel’s experiments he proposed three principles of inheritance, whether you are looking at humans or pea plants, the apparent genetic traits t...
Human behavior is a loosely defined foundation for individuality, generally considered to be influenced and developed by the environment. However, recent molecular studies have exposed genetic factors that suggest a more biological origin for behavior. Gene segments in the genome of humans and other animals have been identified and associated with particular behavioral traits. Is it possible that the presence or absence of even a single gene may predispose one to alcoholism, increased irritability, or enhanced intelligence? Clearly exploration of the nature versus nurture argument with regard to genetic predisposition has social, political, and legal significance.
Paabo, S. (2001). The human genome and our view of ourselves. Science Magazine 291, 1219-1220.
Plants, animals, bacteria, us humans, and every other living thing on this planet have specific traits passed on from its parent or parents. This process is known as hereditary- inheritance of traits from parent to offspring. Scientists study hereditary to understand what makes each organism unique. This is known as genetics. Genetics, just like traits, are passed on from parent to offspring. A trait is a specific characteristic of a living thing such as color, height, weight, muscle strength, etc. However, not all traits are the same for each offspring. For instance, if there are two offspring’s, the second offspring born might not have genetically identical traits as its brother or sister, the first offspring. Traits vary from person to person.
Have you ever wondered why you are the way you are? What makes you brave or shy? For many years, psychologists have been discussing if your genetics or your surroundings are more important to determine personalities. The debate of nature versus nurture is an enduring controversy that has survived through the ages. Many experiments, studies, and discussions have attempted in vain to determine whether biology or environment can be attributed to the way a person has developed. There are two theories about human development that explain how heredity and environment affect an individual. Some people believe that this debate is not solved by one determining force but by a combination of the two. Both heredity and environment play
Height, hair color, eye color and sex are just a few examples of ways our DNA has shaped us. But could it be possible that our DNA also effects the way we behave in society. It is possible that genetics effect us is more ways that we may have imagined. Dr. Peter B. Neubaur believes that shyness, eating disorders, obsessive behavior and psychological illness can all be traced back to our genetics. Sexual orientation is also believed to be derived from genes in our body which determine what sexual preference we prefer. Violence and other types of crimes can be linked back throughout a person’s lineage to witness that other family members have been committed similar crimes without ever meeting one and other.
“We have been very conditioned by the cultures that we come from and are usually very identified with the particular gender that we happen to be a member of.” This quote by Andrew Cohen explains partially how gender identity develops, through the conditioning of our environments. The most influential factor of gender development, however, is still a very controversial issue. An analysis of the gender identification process reveals two main arguments in what factor most greatly contributes to gender development: biology differences (nature) or the environment (nurture).