Galinsky's Argument Analysis

Whereas famous leaders like Czar Nicholas, and Hitler had power. Eventually, they became corrupted and used power for wrong ways. No, it doesn't corrupt at all times given that power can be used to benefit. Power doesn't always breed corruption, For example, Martin Luther King Jr. used his powerful voice to finally get rid of racism. He did not encourage people to use violence, instead he said words are mightier than fist. Which proved to be true. For one thing, Galinsky expected that the empowered participants would be distracted by their own high-powered perch and would behave more impulsively, leading to more errors in recognizing the color of the font. Rather, he found the opposite was true. Proving that power doesn't always breed corruption but makes us aware of the responsibility we are taking on as a leader. However, five of the ten were rated as deeply demeaning. These included things like” “Say I’m filthy five times” and “Bark like a dog three times”. The other five were not considered particularly demeaning. They included: “tell the experimenter a funny joke” and “clap your

As stated by Kate Pickert on pg. 1 of TIME “In one priming exercise, students were asked to form sentences using specific groups of words. The powerful group got words that implied high power, like “authority” or “dominate”. The powerless group were given words such as “subordinate” and “obey”. The control group got power-neutral words.” In contrast, Of course, not everybody in the high power/low-status participants behaved similarly. They chose, on average, 0.67 and 0.85 demeaning activities. However, participants who were low in status but high in power-the classic “little Hitler” combination- chose an average of 1.12 deeply demeaning tasks for their partners to engage in. That was a highly statistically significant