Gabb And Fink: Is There A Sociology Of Love?

937 Words2 Pages

The word love has different meanings depending on what context it is used in, sometimes it means having a deep affection towards someone or something, love for but here I am going to try and answer the question, “Is there a sociology of love?”. In my essay I am going to discuss a sociology of love referring to the article on the study conducted by Gabb and Fink, in which they use multiple research methods to study relationship behaviours and personal lives.

They have provided a detailed description of how the couple tailor their relationships, including the emotions invested in their relationships. Each couple dealing with their love relationships in a different their way. The study looked at different sexual relationships. Love crosses …show more content…

These are the principles set in sociology to answer, illustrate, describe or relate to a certain phenomenon, to give us a perception of a subject. The sociology theories are to enable us to analyse, predict or explain our social sphere. There are macro and micro level analysis of how perspectives work. I am going to evaluate contrasting sociological perspectives to assess particular perspective in Gabb and Fink’s article about love relationships.

A Marxist also known as conflict theory, a macro or structural sociological analysis of society, has an idea that men are the breadwinners, the providers in a love relationship. This theory claims that there are gender roles in a sociology of love. It portrays the male partner as the one who goes out to earn a living for the family while the female plays a role of a homemaker.

A Marxist theory described Sumaira’s behaviour as fitting into a homemaker position where a woman takes a traditional position to take care of the household duties and serving her working husband, but also the writer gets the impression that her diary is written to impress the reader as her life seems too perfect (Gabb and …show more content…

Structural Functionalists describes the purpose of the love relationships in society. The functionalist claims that the main role the love relationships is to safeguard and reassure both the economic and social stability in the society. Members of this social institution assume different roles which compliment each other, the man becomes the provider the woman a homemaker. Relations consists of real emotions and experiences shared which binds people together such as having children and raising them up, (Gabb and Fink 2015).

(ii). Symbolic interactionist’s theory of the sociology of love describes love relationships at a micro level in comparison to the functionalist’s theory. It looks at the couples everyday interactions closely. It looks at how partners interpret symbolic values and habits of couples and how labour and experiences are shared within this social institution.

(iii). Conflict theory includes works of Marx, Engel, Weber and many other social theorists. Engel argued that marriage promoted feminism, men controlled women and children. It stresses social inequalities in a sociology of love, men in dominant position and even if women are employed socially they are still expected to do domestic duties when they come, whereas men come home to rest and wait to be served by their

Open Document