Fred Koreatsu Japanese Internment Analysis

529 Words2 Pages

The story of Fred Korematsu and the Japanese internment is relevant to distinguishing between “law and order” and justice because there were Japanese Americans and Japanese immigrants that had absolutely no intentions of harm against the United States that were forced into jail and internment camps. They were discriminated against only because they were Japanese. Korematsu was the test case that was used to try to achieve justice for Japanese Americans and Japanese immigrants, even though he had a criminal record by definition. He broke the law for justice.
The case of undocumented youth activists highlights the need to make distinctions is for the same reasons, they were fighting the law. They were being nonviolent and they were just protesting for their rights. They again were getting arrested for participating in protests, but they continued fighting for what was right even with deportation and their safety on the line. …show more content…

The word interment definition is “the state of being confined as a prisoner, especially for political or military reasons” (Dictionary.com) By saying that they are a prisoner for political or military reason was wrong. The reason they were confined as a prisoner was a matter of race.
By the government justifying the Japanese incarceration by saying that the Japanese Americans belonged to “an enemy race” is definitely a racist argument. They were at war with the race at that point. Not another country. This case relates directly to the post- September 11th “War on Terror”, just because horrible things are done by people of a specific race/religion suddenly everyone who is part of that race/religion is to blame. When race/religion has nothing to do with

More about Fred Koreatsu Japanese Internment Analysis

Open Document