What Is Prescriptive Grammar?

2414 Words5 Pages

In academic writing, formal structure and prescriptive grammar are utilized for a variety of reasons: to convey ideas clearly, to seem professional, to demonstrate our level of education and vocabulary, to allow a benchmark for grading, and because it is simply the way people are taught in school. However, do these current measures truly have a place in academia? Do these standards harm more than they help? And is the way we teach writing truly the optimal way? There are many reasons why the current standards for academic writing should become more flexible. Current academic writing standards hinder creativity, limit students from underfunded schools and communities, and cater to the able-bodied (both mentally and physically). Because of these …show more content…

A big contender in this argument is that prescriptive grammar is too strict, and that because most people communicate using descriptive grammar, students should be allowed to write academically the way they would speak. Descriptive grammar refers to the “set of grammatical rules based on what we say, not on what we should say according to some language authority” while prescriptive grammar refers to the “set of grammatical rules prescribed by a language authority” (Denham and Lobeck 10). Given these definitions, prescriptive grammar seems too strict to allow the natural flow of speech and therefore allow students to clearly write what they are thinking. Denham and Lobeck say in our textbook that “many prescriptive rules are simply unnatural; they don’t conform to rules of natural language and can be learned only consciously” …show more content…

The fact that a student cannot grasp the strict rules is no fault of their own, but rather seems to be attributed to the ones teaching them. Let the record show that this paper is in no way devaluating teachers, but instead showing the flaws in the education system in general. Prescriptive language’s role in education is ableist. Learning disabilities in regards to learning written language are often treated as a failure of the student due to their laziness or ineptitude, rather than acknowledging their struggles with strict rules such as the ones set in place for academic and formal writing. This phenomena has been cataloged by many researchers, including one thorough project done by the University of Iowa. In that study, researchers discovered that Learning disability (LD) has come to be seen as poor achievement in key aspects of learning having to do with spoken language, written language, and/or mathematics that occur in the context of normal opportunities to learn and in the absence of developmental (autism or mental retardation) or sensory disorders. (Tomblin

Open Document