Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Soviet afghan war us involvement
Importance of foreign policy
Importance of foreign policy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Soviet afghan war us involvement
There are many ways that a country can interact or influence the world that they are a part of. For thousands of years nation-states have enacted diplomacy through diplomatic missions, commerce, embassies, sanctions, and even more hostile actions like open conflict. The United
States is no different in the tools that it has in its arsenal to interact in the realm of International relations. One avenue that the United States approaches international relations with its neighbors is an option that is sometimes considered if not quite sinister at the very least extremely uncouth.
The use of covert action by the US government to enact regime change in foreign governments has proven to be an extremely effective way to enforce its will on the international stage. I will attempt to do this by explaining what exactly it means to use covert action in this manner in addition to briefly citing three historic and distinct examples of regime changed enacted by the
United States and its allies. Obviously each of these events could, and do, cover their own individual books, but the succinct descriptions I'll provide should be more than up to the task.
To start things off let's breakdown what exactly I mean when I said “Foreign Regime
Change by way of American Covert Actions” Why would America want to instigate a regime change in a foreign country? The answers to this question range from the deceptively simple to the endlessly complex. The simple answer is that it would benefit the United States and its interests in some manner or another. These potential benefits can range anywhere from opening up natural resources to capitalistic enterprise all the way to believing that removing a hostile despot from power will improve your own standing in the w...
... middle of paper ...
...in Afghanistan a decade earlier. Instead of directly sending operatives to Libya to fight Gaddafi's regime the CIA was tasked with supplying arms and intelligence to the Libyan rebels. Ultimately Gadaffi would be overthrown by his rebellious population it was with minimal effort from the United States.
In summation the United States has many weapons in its arsenal to deal with a hostile regime. Usually this comes in the form of the Central Intelligence Agency being set loose to do what it is they do best. It has been done successfully numerous times in history, and will more than likely continue to be done into the future. As long as there is hostile foreign powers to be brought down and American influence to be spread the CIA will be there to undermine those nefarious regimes in the name of American interests abroad.
Works Cited
Introduction to Political Science
As stronger nations exercise their control over weaker ones, the United States try to prove their authority, power and control over weaker nations seeing them as unable to handle their own issues thereby, imposing their ideology on them. And if any of these weaker nations try to resist, then the wrath of the United States will come upon them. In overthrow the author Stephen Kinzer tells how Americans used different means to overthrow foreign government. He explains that the campaign & ideology of anti- communism made Americans believe that it was their right and historical obligation to lead forces of good against those of iniquity. They also overthrew foreign government, when economic interest coincided with their ideological ones (kinzer.215). These factors were the reasons behind America’s intervention in Iran, Guatemala, South Vietnam and Chile to control and protect multinational companies as well as the campaign against communism with little or no knowledge about these countries.
America had begun to indulge in the unilateral environment afforded to it during the Cold War. As the Soviet Union began to collapse in the 1980s, the United States was on its way to becoming a solo super power. This acquisition of complete power would inevitably lead the country into new problems, including those foreign and domestic. One of the main issues that came around in the 1980s for the Unites States was the Iran-Contra Affair, which involved the Reagan Administration. With the United States readily inserting influence across the globe, the Iran-Contra Affair proved how foreign intervention can lead to scandal and disgrace in the modern world. Along with detrimental scandals, the Iran-Contra Affair showed how America’s imperialistic behavior in South America was beginning to catch up. In order to remain a dominant influence in South America, the United States had no choice but to topple governments that did not align with American ideology. Using guerillas like the Contras insinuates America’s cornerstone of doing what is necessary in order to satisfy foreign interest.
Introduction Today, electronic surveillance remains one of the most effective tools the United States has to protect against foreign powers and groups seeking to inflict harm on the nation, but it does not go without a few negative aspects, either. Electronic surveillance of foreign intelligence has likely saved the lives of many innocent people through prevention of potential acts of aggression towards the United States. There are many pros to the actions authorized under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) pertaining to electronic surveillance, but there are also cons. Looking at both the pros and cons of electronic surveillance is important in understanding the overall effectiveness of FISA. 1.
‘The wink and the nod’ that was all somehow acceptable to your primary sponsor caused many a dictator to adopt these methods to take and maintain power. Only recently have internal CIA documents become available, allowing researchers to begin to look inside the CIA itself. Partial as these releases are, they supply valuable insight into the machinations of this secretive organization. These documents outline the beginning of the Terror; let's hope we are seeing the end of it.
III. The CIA and Cuban affairs were the ones who planned and carried out the
decided to change their forms of government. The idea that life would be better if things
“Just as the Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev and Chinese leader Mao reinforced armed revolutions against colonial or U.S.-aligned states, American power would now reassure and upkeep rebels against communist states” (“The Reagan Doctrine”, and for some of the rebels who were rendering efforts, with the aid of the U.S., to banish the Soviet supported regimes in their individual nations. The practical implementation of some of the policies of the doctrine prompted confusion in the U.S. political dominion itself. If one would examine, to turn the doctrine’s theory into practice Reagan allowed the sale of weapons to Iran, and the profit of such trade was meant to provide monetary aid to the contras – the anti-Sandinista rebels who were secretly trained by the U.S. Special Forces (“The Reagan Doctrine”, n.d.). Additionally, as the contras were both supported and tactically developed by the U.S. and were used against the Soviet supported regimes, the “Exposure of the Iran-Contra affair in late 1986 provoked a chief congressional examination. The scandal seriously weakened the influence of the president” (“The Reagan Doctrine”, n.d.).
1. Why do you think the autocratic approach worked effectively for four years in this situation?
invaders. However, the ultimate fate of this regime was placed back in the hands of the
...NATO aggression and occupation and the West’s expedient support of one or another oppressive indigenous or regional force. “The United States,” RAWA commented on this occasion, “wants the world to know that it is responsible for the establishment of order in the world and [that] nothing in the world changes without its will so it can extend its presence in the region by bringing together our enemies of different species and tightening their leashes in its hands.” The group went on to say that the United States “can create a regime that is much more mafia, dependent, corrupt, anti-people and more ridiculous than the current one in our homeland; and after the expiration date of its dirty creations, it will take each by the tail and throw them aside like mice. … These “insultingly painful games,” RAWA said, “are played with our suffering nation.…” However, they said,
America is under the treat of a terrorist attack. Ever since the events of September 11th that idea has become a constant reality to the American public. Although terrorism is not a new concept, not even on American soil, it has become more of a reality in the resent decade. Terrorism takes many forms and threats are not always the way someone might picture them. Homegrown terrorist can have the same effect that international organizations may. Each group is attempting to achieve their own political or social goals and the only thing Americans can do is to prepare for the inevitable. The attack could come in many forms but a Chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear attack could be devastating. These weapons have been used in the past with devastating results. Despite the treat of CBRN weapons America fails to address its vulnerabilities to this threat.
by a world power can be felt by practically every nation of the globe involved
?Espionage.? 2000-2004. The War to End All Wars. Michael Duffy. Original Material. Primary Documents Online.
...ment and well-being. It is clear that without the ongoing presence and work of international organisations, the international system would be in a far worse and more chaotic state, with a far greater chance for a civil war to breakout. They also are a major player in helping develop states political and economical systems.
... in the new environment and fully embrace the socio-economic and political aspects of the new environment. Nevertheless, this paper has refuted the fact that one may completely forget the social conditions of their home country by permanently living in another country. In conclusion, living in another country involves change. However, the change is never permanent and is only oriented towards the interest that made one move into another country.