Feminism In Poniewozik's Cinderella And The Princess Culture

1124 Words3 Pages

Fairytales, existing for several generations, have evolved through time, catching the attention of many belletrist, demanding an explanation of how feminism plays an essential role in today's culture. Both James Poniewozik and Peggy Orenstein discuss this topic through connecting to the real world and fairytales. Furthermore, in Poniewozik’s article, “The Princess Paradox” he discusses the “girls-kick-ass culture” (323) and how males naturally have an advantage on females. Whereas Peggy Orenstein’s article, “Cinderella and the Princess Culture” approaches the issue of feminism within fairytales in a more feministic manner. While both authors address feminism, Poniewozik shows his concern among the culture of fairytales in movies while Orenstein …show more content…

He begins the article by discussing the “recurring nightmare of high-minded modern parents of daughters” He writes, “Call it nature or nurture, harmless fantasy or insidious indoctrination, but Hollywood is discovering that it still pays not to fight the royal urge” (323). Although his use of words suggests that Hollywood is the reason for the dispute, he emphasizes the suggestion of nature vs nurture. This commentary sets up his viewpoint of feminism in both the real world and in films. Orenstein acknowledges Poniewozik’s idea when she begins her article discussing a problematic story that occurred in the dentist office, continuing to state, “I have been taken by surprise by the princess craze and the girlie-girl culture that has risen around it” (327). Orenstein describes herself as a “feminist mother” (327) who believes that young girls should not remain looked at as comely or dainty but something deeper because the word “princess” is so broadly constructed. Poniewozik agrees when he discusses the belief of women needing to have independence and self-determination. “You need a feisty girl, and self-determination of skepticism and a fabulous ball gown” …show more content…

Poniewozik states, “She needs to assert her independence” (324). Although he declares this, he does not provide much explanation of what he means. However, Orenstein does in fact favor his side by informing us of her own life experience. “I watch my fellow mothers, women who once swore they’d never be dependent on a man, smile indulgently at daughters who warble” (327). Both authors clarify how society must not rely on movies or fairytales to decide a woman’s ending but that women need to continue toward the girls “kick-ass-culture” that Poniewozik describes. However their suggestions do differ and add some contradiction to the overall intention of “women asserting independence”. Poniewozik states, “[a]mong an earlier generation of women, the wish was to be able to do everything men could” (324). Supposing that Poniewozik wants to change this complication, his statement lacks logical evidence and does not supply the audience with the correct knowledge to understand his proclamation. In addition, Orenstein informs the audience about her own understanding among the issue, “I see girls expanding their imagination through visualizing themselves as princesses, and then they pass through that phase and end up becoming lawyers, doctors, mothers or princesses, whatever the case may be” (329). Although Orenstein’s observation is understandable,

Open Document