Tambopata Peru is one of the poorest and most underdeveloped regions of Latin America. The area is home to undernourished children, lack of secure work and education.
There is an imperative need not just for Tambopata, but all of Peru to increase its economy and enable the access of basic needs to its citizens. While the area of Tambopata has many arguments for its potential use, sustainable soybean cultivation is the best approach to improve Peruvian infrastructure, economy and future preservation of natural areas.
There are many potential land uses for the Tambopata Reserve. One of which, that gains much environmentalist backing, is slash and burn agriculture. While this method of agriculture has long traditionally been employed and is seen as “greener,” many are misinformed of its methods and potential for environmental destruction. Slash and burn agriculture declines soil fertility as biomass is extracted, which leads to increases in runoff and eventually desertification. Furthermore, the desiccation of single stands of forested areas for this type of agriculture promotes local extinctions and loss of biodiversity. Once the land is exhausted, it is then left, only for another stand to be destroyed. This predictable loss of land can be avoided by employing the sustainable farming of soybeans. Soybean production has a higher potential to both increase economic prosperity and environmental quality (Dooyou).
Due to the destructive nature of slash and burn agriculture, soybean production is a much healthier approach to farming in the Tambopata Reserve. The utilization of conservation tillage and genetically modified (GMO) soybeans offers a way to protect Tambopata and generate a better quality life for its people. A study in t...
... middle of paper ...
...ural, Financial and Industrial Products and Services. 2011. Web. 26 Apr. 2011. .
Green, David. "U.S. Soybean Production + Biotechnology = Increased Sustainability." United Soybean Board Royal Overseas League. 28 Sept. 2010. Web. 26 Apr. 2011.
"Rainforests - Review - Slash and Burn." Web. 26 Apr. 2011. .
Schonecker, Jake. "Sustainable Soy" in Santarem: Power Struggles for Future Development. Villanova University, Spring 2007. Web. 26 Apr. 2011.
"Soy Moratorium in Brazil." IUCN/WWF, Sept. 2006. Web. 26 Apr. 2011.
Stern, David L. The Environmental Kuznets Curve. International Society for Ecological Economics Internet Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics, June 2003. Web. 26 Apr. 2011.
The cultivation of rice has had an enormous impact on the natural biome. Rice has affected the natural biome that it is grown in, in a devastating way. It has caused the natural biomes to deteriorate and caused the natural way of life to collapse leaving no place for the native animals and plants. But what would happen if the cultivation of rice stopped and the natural biomes returned to their former glory? What would happen to all those people depending on rice for the next meal? Those who depend on rice to pay for and keep their families alive? This report looks at the where, effects, who and how of rice cultivation.
This policy memo addresses the development and expansion of the cattle ranching industry in Brazil, which has contributed to the mass deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon in the last 40 years. It exposes the regional and global consequences to deforestation and provides strategies for the Brazilian government to sustainably manage cattle ranching industries while protecting the future of the Amazon. The rainforest ecosystem is an immense reserve of natural recourses that is far more valuable than the beef produced on Brazilian cattle ranches. Not only does the rainforest create habitat for up to 65% of the world’s biodiversity, but when harvested sustainably, it provides humans with an abundance of spices, foods, oils, medicines and vital research areas (NEWMAN).
With an ever increasing world population, massive third world hunger, and with an estimation that a child dies for every two seconds world-wide from starvation; this does not even take into account the number of people who are mal and undernourished, there is a great promise in the use of this technology to benefit not only the farmers, but also societies worldwide. We have been able to genetically modify plants so that they may be more resistant to insects, so that there is less pesticidal toxins sprayed. We have designed plants that require less water, less soil nutrients, preserving precious recourses. We have designed plants with higher yield, shorter seasons, plants that need less land to grow; we are said to be living in a time where we have the healthiest, most well-tested plants in the history of this
To get his shoestrings he speculates in herds of cattle.” Thoreau could foresee the impact that altering the genes of these plants could have on a society. The most misleading hopes proclaimed by GM technology firms is that this will help solve the world’s hunger. Granted some of this technology does offer higher single crop yields, but traditional farming techniques generally produce higher yields per acre. In a study done on 8,200 fields, by The Board of Agriculture at the National Academy of Sciences former board of director, Charles Benbrook, Roundup Ready soybeans yielded fewer bushels of beans than non-GM. They grew five different strains of Monsanto soy plants in four different places with varied soil types The study found that the average yield for non-GM soybeans was 51.21 bushels per acre and 49.26 for GM. This was confirmed later in another study at the University of Nebraska 's Institute of Agricultural Resources. "The numbers were clear," stated Dr. Elmore, the head director of the study. They found that on average GM seeds, which are more expensive, produced six percent less than non-GM relatives, and eleven percent less than the highest yielding conventional crops. The yield for Bt corn, however, in other studies was higher. But this did not lead to greater profit because GM related costs in terms of insecticides, fertilizer and labor were
...to be resistant to the company's own Roundup herbicide This means that farmers are utterly dependent on Monsanto; a situation similar as with the United States. The biggest adversaries of GM soybeans are environmentalist. For example, floods are happening because of soya farming in the region of Santa Fe and Chaco where the Salado River begins. The deforestation and the low permeability of the soil used in soya farming contributed to more channeling more water into the river. On the other side, people claim that GM crops are required to fight hunger in poor and developing countries. Evidence shows otherwise. GM crops have increased the use of pesticides while increasing poverty. Over 170,000 famers have had to quit on their lands because they couldn’t compete with big GM farmers, thus leading to more poverty. Also, herbicides have introduced new health problems.
1. International Workshop on the Ecological Impacts of Transgenic Crops. Altieri, Miguel A. 2000. University of California, Berkley. <http://biotech-info.net/summary1.pdf>
USDA. "Agricultural Biotechnology: Adoption of Biotechnology and its Production Impacts". USDA Website. Available online at http://www.usda.gov. Accessed November 6, 2003.
Stern, DI 2004, 'The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets Curve', World Development, vol. 32 no. 8, pp 1419-1439, Elsevier, Maryland, USA.
...vent weeds and diseases in the plants could be absorbed into the fish or animals in the area, presenting a danger to citizens who later consume them. The problems of deforestation in the soybean industry are running rampant, leaving areas barren; Brazil being the perfect example.
The approach describes all the modern-day strategies developed and designed to support and enable the capability of the native communities in sustaining the friendly way of interacting with the environment. The description provides a clear picture of indigenous food systems in supporting the direct and indirect transfer of energy to the modern agriculture-based economy that was industrialized and developed by the settlers through the process of colonization (Working Group on Indigenous Food Sovereignty ). Embracing indigenous foods, the indigenous ways of food production, and agriculture is important especially in the contemporary society where genetically modified foods have resulted in negative health impacts, food insecurity, and development of environmental non-friendly policies in agriculture and food
While the the mine itself has generated a lot of tax revenue for Peru’s underfunded central government. The problems this mine generates are on an environmental level. The surrounding villages are left to deal with the environmental damages while the companies that own the mine, such as the world bank, are profiting. In the province of Cajamarca, where the mine is located, more than half of the people live under the national poverty line of approximately $100USD a month (Hallman & Olivera, 2015).
There are many times where a heralded blessing for a country’s struggling economy can have an unpredicted down side. Despite being a very resource-rich country, almost half of the population lives below the poverty line. For generations the people’s livelihoods of harvesting the nutritious, drought, cold, and saline tolerant quinoa crops to sustained them. Now, with the modern age of information and health awareness in the industrialized countries, the Bolivian farmers have the chance to grow and expand their crops, harvesting them to make a cash profit. While this can seem like the saving grace for the struggling indigenous Andes farmers, there is the unforeseen plight of the impoverished natives that relied on the grain
...ming for food production. It is important that Tim finds farmers who are using sustainable methods to ensure quality of the products and sustainability for the environment.
The technique is a way to grow crops in the tropical areas, while allowing the soil to replenish itself. Throughout the tropical area this technique allows accumulation to increase with less labor involved. This effective idea is used to mobilize the workforce and accumulate wealth. By altering the landscape less, cultivation makes it easier to circulate the environment and allows more time for a nutrient-layer to develop the fertilization of the crops. The slash-and-burn cultivation is more suitable than agriculture because it requires less investment of time and labor. The technique is ecologically superior of growing crops in the tropics because of the fewer tools utilized to benefit the usage of reduced activity. Horticulture is essentially more effective in tropical areas because when growing crops it is a domestic manner of cultivation. It is usually practiced on a smaller scale which allows it to generally be less expensive to Agriculture as well. Evolving the plot rotation and movement it creates a sustainable health of the people among the society. By having more diversity, the crops are less vulnerable to disease and allows for more nutrient diversity. Ultimately making this technique more effective in tropical forests rather than using Agriculture
Genetic engineering enhances plant resistance to drought, salinity, disease, pests and herbicides. The aim is to try and enhance the growth, productivity, nutrient value, and chemical composition of the plants. Chemicals are constantly being developed or improved to enhance the competitiveness and adaptability of crops, and to kill the parasites and weeds which plague the agricultural sector. . This however is not always good as the plant and the pests then become resistant to these new chemicals defeating the purpose of it being used. The new chemicals which are produced to kill these strong pests and weeds may be more harmful to other plants and remove nutrients within the soil in turn reducing the yield of agricultural crops. The benefits of these characteristics are seen in Argentina according to Pelletier (2010) as they use glyphosphate resistant soybean which allowed the comeback of this crop, as the so...