Fairmount Energy Inc. Fairmount Energy was established on April 1st, 2002 in Calgary, Alberta and is an energy company that focuses on natural resources such as oil and gas. Fairmount Energy’s main purpose is to acquire petroleum, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. In the year 2004, Fairmount Energy’s shares were given the stock symbol FMT and were added to the Toronto Stock Exchange. The company receives auditing services from Deloitte & Touche LLP (D. Touche, 2004). Furthermore, Fairmount Energy owns several properties in the province of Alberta in areas such as Gold Creek, Harmattan, Crossfield, Gilby, Warner, and Little Bow. The Board of Directors of Fairmount Energy consists of Joseph S. Durante, Brian J Mellum, Abdel F. Z. Badwi, Peter Salamon, Charles W. …show more content…
A decreasing debt to total assets ratio shows that the business is improving at obtaining assets while using liabilities. Furthermore, both ratios are low which is very healthy and indicates that the company as great portion of assets in comparison to liabilities. Fairmount Energy has shown their ability to obtain more assets and less liabilities as the debt to total assets ratio has decreased within the year. The working capital of Fairmount Energy as calculated using the current assets, and current liabilities given in the annual report of the year ended March 31st, 2009 is -$6,978,713. Given this information, an auditor can conclude that the company has a very low working capital. On March 31st, 2009, Fairmount Energy has a large amount of liabilities and a small amount of assets, which creates a working capital deficit. In addition, the annual report of the year ended March 31st, 2008 shows that the working capital of Fairmount Energy is -$13,897,716 which is an extremely low working
Net working capital represents organization’s operating liquidity. In order to compute the net working capital, total current assets are divided from total current liabilities. When there is sufficient excess of current assets over current liabilities, an organization might be considered sufficiently liquid. Another ratio that helps in assessing the operating liquidity of as company is a current ratio. The ratio is calculated by dividing the total current assets over total current liabilities. When the current ratio is high, the organization has enough of current assets to pay for the liabilities. Yet, another mean of calculating the organization’s debt-paying ability is the debt ratio. To calculate the ratio, total liabilities are divided by total assets. The computation gives information on what proportion of organization’s assets is financed by a debt, and what is the entity’s ability to pay for current and long term liabilities. Lower debt ratio is better, because the low liabilities require low debt payments. To be able to lend money, an organization’s current ratio has to fall above a certain level, also the debt ratio cannot rise above a certain threshold. Otherwise, the entity will not be able to lend money or will have to pay high penalties. The following steps can be undertaken by a company to keep the debt ratio within normal
MCI current capital structure is x% debt and y% equity. Their key ratios are a, b, and c. Comparing to other firms in the utilities industry they appear to be underutilizing (debt/equity). (See exhibit D). Referencing the forecast there is expected to b...
Looking at the individual ratios seen in exhibit 1 and comparing it to the industry average shown in exhibit 2 gives a sense of where this company stands. Current ratio and quick ratio are really low and have been decreasing. For 1995, the current ratio is 1.15:1, which is less than the industry average of 1.60:1, however to give a better sense of where this stands in the industry, as seen in exhibit 3, it is actually less than the average of the bottom 25% of the industry. The quick ratio is 0.61 is less than the industry is 0.90. Both these ratios serve to point out the lack of cash in this company. The cash flow has been decreasing because, it takes longer to get the money from customers, but the company still needs to pay for its purchases. Also, the company couldn’t go over the $400,000 loan limit, so they were forced to stretch their cash.
The consistent high spending of capital equipment is the first reason why one would recommend reducing the debt to equity ratio. A company with higher levels of debt is less flexible in being able to adjust to new market demands and conditions that require the company to make new products or respond to competition. Looking at the pecking order of financing, issuing new shares to fund capital investing is the last resort and a company that has high levels of debt, must move to the equity side to avoid the risk of bankruptcy. Defaulting on loans occur when increased costs or bad economic conditions lead the firm to have lower net income than the payments on loans. The risk of defaulting on loans and the direct and indirect cost related to defaulting lead firms to prefer lower levels of debt. The financial distress caused by additional leverage can lead to lower cash flows available to all investors, lower than if the firm was financed by equity only. Additionally, the high debt ratio that Du Pont incurred also led to them dropping from a AAA bond rating to a AA bond Rating. Although the likelihood of not being able to acquire loans would be minimal, there are increased interest costs with having a lower bond rating. The lower bond rating signals to investors that the firm is more likely to default than if it had a higher (AAA) bond rating.
In terms of Duke Energy’s vision for the future, Duke has been investing billions in offering cheaper sources of energy for its customers(Tully). Currently, Duke is investing five billion dollars to build a pipeline that would span from Pennsylvania to North Carolina(Tully). Good described the pipeline as “[a] critical step forward” (Downey). The purpose of this pipeline it to transport gas more efficiently. Another substantial goal and vision for Duke and Good is to invest in clean energy for the future (Tully)(Downey).
When comparing the debt-to-assets ratio of McDonalds and Wendys, you have to divide the firms total liabilities by their total assets. Essentially, the debt-to-assets ratio is the primary indicator of the firms debt management. As the ratio increases or decreases, it indicates the firms changing reliance on borrowed resources. The lower the ratio the more efficient the firm will be able to liquidate its assets if operations were discontinued, and debts needed to be collected. In 2005 Wendy's had $2,076,043 worth in total assets and $846,264 in total liabilities. When divided, Wendys has the lower ratio of the two competitors at 40%. This means that they would take losses of 40% if operations were shut down, and the cash received from valuable assets would still be sufficient to pay off the entire debt. It also means that 40% of Wendys assets are made through debt. McDonalds in 2005 had $12,545.3 (in millions) of total liabilities and $22,534.5 (in millions) of total assets. After doing the math, McDonalds ends up with a ratio of 56% which is higher than Wendys by sixteen percent. This means that there is more default on McDonalds liabilities, which can be a costly event from lenders perspective. McDonalds makes 56% of all its assets through debt. In reality, its not good to have a debt-to-assets ratio over 50%. Its also not good to have a debt-to-assets ratio that is too low because...
Every resource on our planet is limited. This is not surprising information as humans have known this since the beginning of existence. Eventually, oil and other resources will no longer be viable sources of energy because they will be depleted. The simple answer to this inevitable issue is hydraulic fracturing. It is currently a controversial means of finding energy and was argued both ways by Josh Fox in his film Gasland as well as Phelim McAleer in his documentary FrackNation. Hydraulic fracturing, better known as “fracking”, is a safe and efficient way to acquire the copious amounts of energy needed to power the earth.
Apple’s debt to equity ratio is not very high compared to the industry average of 2.23. The Debt to Equity Ratio of 2014 is 1.08, in which the normal ratio should be less than 1. This ratio of 1.08 shows that the company is financing more assets with debt than equity. In spite
As of December 26, 2004, our liquid assets totaled $10,924,000. These assets consisted of cash and cash equivalents in the amount of $10,642,000 and short-term investments in the amount of $282,000. The working capital deficit increased slightly from $50,359,000 as of December 28, 2003 to $51,041,000 as of December 26, 2004. This increase was due primarily to increases in the loss reserve and unearned premiums related to the captive insurance subsidiary and accounts payable and was partially offset by increases in inventories and receivables.
...To check how successful it has been, we calculate debtor collection period ratio. (Dyson, 2004) Fixed Asset turnover: In this ratio, we seek the amount of sales that can be generated (or the amount of fixed assets necessary to achieve a level of sales) from a given level of fixed assets. (Klein, 1998) Total asset turnover: This ratio determines that how efficiently a firm is utilizing its assets. If the asset turnover ratio is high, the firm is using its assets effectively in generating sales. If this ratio is low, the firm may not be using its assets efficiently and shall either increase sales or eliminate some of the existing assets. (Argenti, 2002) Solvency Ratio Gearing: Gearing reflects the relationship between a company’s equity capital (ordinary shares and reserves) and its other form of long-term funding (preference share, debenture, etc.) (Black, 2000)
The horizontal analysis shows that Woqod’s total current assets increased by 69% and its total current liabilities increased by 102% during 2005. This is largely explained by the increase in receivables, the increase in inventory, the increase in loans, and the increase in payables. The higher increase in total current liabilities than in total current assets explains why the current and acid-test ratios decreased from 1.82 to 1.53 and from 1.74 to 1.48, respectively. The values of the mentioned ratios indicate that Woqod is not highly liquid and that its liquidity is dropping.
The Quick Ratio shows that the company’s cash and cash equivalents are the highest t...
Canadian Natural Resources is an oil and gas exploration, development and production company with its corporate head office in Calgary, Alberta. CNR is Canada’s largest oil and gas company and one of the world’s largest independent oil and gas producer. CNR was founded in Calgary, Alberta in 1989 but there is no specific man or women who have found the company. The company started off with drilling shallow gas basin, which is a big contributor of their success. Slowly they shifted into bitumen and crude oil. CNR headquarters are located in Calgary, Alberta and all the other offices are located in Alberta except for one, Fort St.John which is located in British Columbia. Their factories and offices are located in Alberta because Alberta is the
Research on the Sources of Finance for a Business Firms sometimes need to raise finance for Working Capital and Capital Expenditure. Explain what each is and give examples. · Working Capital (or Revenue Expenditure) The working capital is made up of the current assets net of the current liabilities. It is vital to a business to have sufficient working capital to meet all its requirements. Many businesses have gone under, not because they were unprofitable, but because they suffered from shortages of working capital.
The capital maintenance concept used results in differences between the relevance and faithful representation of the data that appears in the balance sheet and income statement. The difference between financial capital maintenance and physical is the treatment of unrealized holding gains and losses. Financial capital maintenance does not allow for unrealized holding gains and losses. Only realized gains and losses are included in income because they “are considered a return on capital” (Schroeder et al., 2013). This means, “income is measured only after the investment is recovered” (Gamble, 1981). Physical capital maintenance “consider[s unrealized holding gains and losses] as returns of capital and do[es] not include them income.” (Schroeder et al., 2013). Instead, they are treated as adjustments to equity and included in other comprehensive income. Therefore, with physical capital maintenance “an increase in an entity’s wealth as...