Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Write a short note on liquidity ratios
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Liquidity Analysis Industries Qatar The analysis shows the following findings in terms of IQ’s liquidity: • The horizontal analysis shows that IQ’s total current assets increased by 25% and its total current liabilities increased by 40% during 2005. This is largely explained by the increase in trade receivables, the increase in inventory, the increase in trades payable, and the increase in term loans (notes 5, 6, 12, and 13 of the 2005 financial statement). The higher increase in total current liabilities than in total current assets explains why the current and acid-test ratios decreased from 4.66 to 4.17 and from 4.02 to 3.5, respectively. However, IQ seems to remain highly liquid considering the values of the mentioned liquidity ratios. • The current cash debt coverage ratio dropped from 3.38 to 2.69. This is because the increase in cash from operating activities (26%) is lower than the increase in the average total current liabilities (58%). Again, IQ seems to remain highly liquid nevertheless. • The receivables turnover is based on the assumption that all sales are credit sales. The values of receivables turnover for 2004 and 2005 are 10.21 times and 8.83 times, respectively. This means that IQ’s efficiency is considerably declining in terms of cash collection. The decrease in receivables turnover is explained by the higher increase in average net receivables (71%) than the increase in net credit sales (25%). • The inventory turnover decreased from 3.8 to 3.59. This is explained by the higher increase in the average inventory (37%) than the increase in cost of sales (29%) during 2005. This means that the rate at which inventory is sold is dropping • The vertical analysis shows that the percentage of total current assets to total assets increased from 50% to 52%. This means that IQ has not made major investments in the business during 2005. Woqod The analysis shows the following findings in terms of Woqod’s liquidity: • The horizontal analysis shows that Woqod’s total current assets increased by 69% and its total current liabilities increased by 102% during 2005. This is largely explained by the increase in receivables, the increase in inventory, the increase in loans, and the increase in payables. The higher increase in total current liabilities than in total current assets explains why the current and acid-test ratios decreased from 1.82 to 1.53 and from 1.74 to 1.48, respectively. The values of the mentioned ratios indicate that Woqod is not highly liquid and that its liquidity is dropping.
Sales growth after 2000 were only 9%, which the average annual sale growth rates range from 10% to 30% in their industry. The lack of cash is explained by the current liquidity ratio
Particulars The Hershey Tootsie Rolls Net sales (A) $ 5,671,009 $ 528,369 Beginning receivable $ 390,061 $ 41,895 Ending receivable $ 410,390 $ 37,394 Average receivable (B) $ 400,226 $ 39,645 Account receivable turnover C = (A/B) 14.17 13.33 Average collection period 365/C 25.76 27.39 As can be seen from the above, the table shows that both The Hershey and Tootsie Rolls companies have very low receivable periods due to the nature of the industry and also reflects the efficient cash management and receivable management on the part of both the companies.
Looking at the individual ratios seen in exhibit 1 and comparing it to the industry average shown in exhibit 2 gives a sense of where this company stands. Current ratio and quick ratio are really low and have been decreasing. For 1995, the current ratio is 1.15:1, which is less than the industry average of 1.60:1, however to give a better sense of where this stands in the industry, as seen in exhibit 3, it is actually less than the average of the bottom 25% of the industry. The quick ratio is 0.61 is less than the industry is 0.90. Both these ratios serve to point out the lack of cash in this company. The cash flow has been decreasing because, it takes longer to get the money from customers, but the company still needs to pay for its purchases. Also, the company couldn’t go over the $400,000 loan limit, so they were forced to stretch their cash.
.... In addition, inventory turnover shows a consistent increase from 2.16 in 2011 to 2.38 and 2.49 for 2012 and 2013 respectively.
Current ratio: This number is found by dividing the current assets by the current liabilities that is found on the balance sheet. The current ratio for 2010 was .666. This was calculated by $1550,631 / $2,326,966. The current ratio for 2011 was .905. This number was calculated by $1,543,816 / $1,705,132.
Total Asset Turnover – Dropped from .64 in 2001 to .58 in 2002 to .55 in 2003. The reason is big increase in Total Assets.
Fixed Asset Turnover has fallen from 1.47 in 2014 to 1.46 in 2015 which is very minimal; indeed, this can have impact on the operating performance of the company. The effect of this fall can be easily recovered as there was a great increase in the revenue. The fall shows that company is not effective in getting utilization from fixed assets. (XERO Annual Report, 2015)
Overall, Horizontal analysis and financial ratios are essential factors that businesses use to monitor its liquidity. Therefore, in order to improve Apple’s ratios and profitability, the company needs to implement a strategy to increase the company’s liquidity. Business owners or managers should monitor current ratio and acid test ratio as these ratios help us to ensure the company has the proper liquid assets to pay current liabilities, to stay in operations and to expand the company. As we noted in our acid test ratio and current ratio for the company, we show a lower ratio for acid test ratio than the current ratio, which means that the company’s current assets rely on inventory. Therefore, the company needs to convert old inventory into
By taking into account only the most liquid assets, ratio 1.0 in 2013 and 2012, which increased by a small margin 0.2 from 2011, indicates that company has strong liquidity position.
Its receivable turnover is 13.4 times per year, which is higher than C-P 10.5. In addition, the average number of days from sale on account to collection for P&G is 27.2 days while for C-P is 34.8 days. Based on the efficiency ratio analysis, P&G’s inventory moves quickly from purchase to sale, which the inventory turnover ratio is 6.2 and the time for the purchased inventories to be on sale is on the average of 58.6 days while C-P’s turnover ratio is 5.2 and the average days to sell is 70.6. This shows that P&G takes a shorter time than C-P to sell their inventories. However, C-P has a higher ability to pay their short-term liabilities, whereby the current ratio is 1.08 as opposed to P&G
The Quick Ratio shows that the company’s cash and cash equivalents are the highest t...
Upon examining P&G’s financial ability to meet short-term obligations, it is apparent that not only have their current liabilities exceeded current assets over the last three years, but close to half of their current assets have been tied up in inventories and other illiquid assets. For example, assessing both the quick and current ratio respectively shows that less than 70% of the firm’s current assets could be converted immediately to pay current commitments, but a little more than 90% of the firm’s liabilities would ultimately be covered. Though, based on industry average similar findings occur; therefore, it must not be uncommon for industries similar to P&G to
(Net sales)/(Average inventory at retail) OR Inventory turnover = (Cost of goods sold)/(Average inventory at cost) The first definition of inventory turnover is at retail while the second definition is at cost. Some retailers prefer to measure inventory turnover at retail while others at cost but there is no difference between these two definitions as they yield the same result. The inventory turnover rate is typically expressed on an annual basis rather than on month or parts of a year.
This is calculated by taking the total liabilities and dividing it by the stockholder’s equity, as a result it directly marks the risk that the company defaults on the repayment of its liabilities. Advance Auto Parts has a debt to equity ratio was declining at the start of the period, except for 2014 when took a long-term