Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Write a short note on liquidity ratios
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Liquidity Analysis Industries Qatar The analysis shows the following findings in terms of IQ’s liquidity: • The horizontal analysis shows that IQ’s total current assets increased by 25% and its total current liabilities increased by 40% during 2005. This is largely explained by the increase in trade receivables, the increase in inventory, the increase in trades payable, and the increase in term loans (notes 5, 6, 12, and 13 of the 2005 financial statement). The higher increase in total current liabilities than in total current assets explains why the current and acid-test ratios decreased from 4.66 to 4.17 and from 4.02 to 3.5, respectively. However, IQ seems to remain highly liquid considering the values of the mentioned liquidity ratios. • The current cash debt coverage ratio dropped from 3.38 to 2.69. This is because the increase in cash from operating activities (26%) is lower than the increase in the average total current liabilities (58%). Again, IQ seems to remain highly liquid nevertheless. • The receivables turnover is based on the assumption that all sales are credit sales. The values of receivables turnover for 2004 and 2005 are 10.21 times and 8.83 times, respectively. This means that IQ’s efficiency is considerably declining in terms of cash collection. The decrease in receivables turnover is explained by the higher increase in average net receivables (71%) than the increase in net credit sales (25%). • The inventory turnover decreased from 3.8 to 3.59. This is explained by the higher increase in the average inventory (37%) than the increase in cost of sales (29%) during 2005. This means that the rate at which inventory is sold is dropping • The vertical analysis shows that the percentage of total current assets to total assets increased from 50% to 52%. This means that IQ has not made major investments in the business during 2005. Woqod The analysis shows the following findings in terms of Woqod’s liquidity: • The horizontal analysis shows that Woqod’s total current assets increased by 69% and its total current liabilities increased by 102% during 2005. This is largely explained by the increase in receivables, the increase in inventory, the increase in loans, and the increase in payables. The higher increase in total current liabilities than in total current assets explains why the current and acid-test ratios decreased from 1.82 to 1.53 and from 1.74 to 1.48, respectively. The values of the mentioned ratios indicate that Woqod is not highly liquid and that its liquidity is dropping.
Sales growth after 2000 were only 9%, which the average annual sale growth rates range from 10% to 30% in their industry. The lack of cash is explained by the current liquidity ratio
Net working capital represents organization’s operating liquidity. In order to compute the net working capital, total current assets are divided from total current liabilities. When there is sufficient excess of current assets over current liabilities, an organization might be considered sufficiently liquid. Another ratio that helps in assessing the operating liquidity of as company is a current ratio. The ratio is calculated by dividing the total current assets over total current liabilities. When the current ratio is high, the organization has enough of current assets to pay for the liabilities. Yet, another mean of calculating the organization’s debt-paying ability is the debt ratio. To calculate the ratio, total liabilities are divided by total assets. The computation gives information on what proportion of organization’s assets is financed by a debt, and what is the entity’s ability to pay for current and long term liabilities. Lower debt ratio is better, because the low liabilities require low debt payments. To be able to lend money, an organization’s current ratio has to fall above a certain level, also the debt ratio cannot rise above a certain threshold. Otherwise, the entity will not be able to lend money or will have to pay high penalties. The following steps can be undertaken by a company to keep the debt ratio within normal
Particulars The Hershey Tootsie Rolls Net sales (A) $ 5,671,009 $ 528,369 Beginning receivable $ 390,061 $ 41,895 Ending receivable $ 410,390 $ 37,394 Average receivable (B) $ 400,226 $ 39,645 Account receivable turnover C = (A/B) 14.17 13.33 Average collection period 365/C 25.76 27.39 As can be seen from the above, the table shows that both The Hershey and Tootsie Rolls companies have very low receivable periods due to the nature of the industry and also reflects the efficient cash management and receivable management on the part of both the companies.
.... In addition, inventory turnover shows a consistent increase from 2.16 in 2011 to 2.38 and 2.49 for 2012 and 2013 respectively.
Looking at the individual ratios seen in exhibit 1 and comparing it to the industry average shown in exhibit 2 gives a sense of where this company stands. Current ratio and quick ratio are really low and have been decreasing. For 1995, the current ratio is 1.15:1, which is less than the industry average of 1.60:1, however to give a better sense of where this stands in the industry, as seen in exhibit 3, it is actually less than the average of the bottom 25% of the industry. The quick ratio is 0.61 is less than the industry is 0.90. Both these ratios serve to point out the lack of cash in this company. The cash flow has been decreasing because, it takes longer to get the money from customers, but the company still needs to pay for its purchases. Also, the company couldn’t go over the $400,000 loan limit, so they were forced to stretch their cash.
Total Asset Turnover – Dropped from .64 in 2001 to .58 in 2002 to .55 in 2003. The reason is big increase in Total Assets.
Advance Auto Parts appears to be managing its liquidity very well having the highest liquidity ratios in the industry. It is more liquid meaning it is in a better position than O’ Reilly Auto Parts to pay off its current liabilities if it is required. Although O’Reilly appears to be less liquid, it is not an indication that the company is struggling, since it only indicates that they do not heavily rely on its inventory to pay its short-term creditors. Additionally, their days to receivables is much lower than its competitor, who should look at reducing their ratio since their receivable are not
When analyzing Apple’s Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio, the ratio is lower than the average industry. The ratio shows 11.96 times in account receivable collections during the year and how efficiently Apple uses its assets (Miller-Nobles, Mattison and Matsumura 781-782). Account receivable collections will increase after the release of the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6Plus by mid-September. Therefore, increasing the ratios of account receivable turnover and inventory turnover.
Fixed Asset Turnover has fallen from 1.47 in 2014 to 1.46 in 2015 which is very minimal; indeed, this can have impact on the operating performance of the company. The effect of this fall can be easily recovered as there was a great increase in the revenue. The fall shows that company is not effective in getting utilization from fixed assets. (XERO Annual Report, 2015)
The intangibiles has also decreased from 18% to 16% in common-size balance sheet for Applebee’s from 2000 to 2001. This is equivalent to a decrease of 7% from year to year percentage change. This change was driven by amortization of intangible assets related to previous acquisitions of other franchisee restaurants by Applebee’s.
Its receivable turnover is 13.4 times per year, which is higher than C-P 10.5. In addition, the average number of days from sale on account to collection for P&G is 27.2 days while for C-P is 34.8 days. Based on the efficiency ratio analysis, P&G’s inventory moves quickly from purchase to sale, which the inventory turnover ratio is 6.2 and the time for the purchased inventories to be on sale is on the average of 58.6 days while C-P’s turnover ratio is 5.2 and the average days to sell is 70.6. This shows that P&G takes a shorter time than C-P to sell their inventories. However, C-P has a higher ability to pay their short-term liabilities, whereby the current ratio is 1.08 as opposed to P&G
Inventory Turnover (2011 only): For the year 2011, the inventory turnover was calculated by the cost of good sold divided by the typical average amount of inventory. The average inventory was equal to the current inventory plus the prior inventory all divided then by two. Resulting in the 2011 Inventory Turnover to be equal to 3.480 because 5,385,088 / 1,547,223.5=
... inventory turnover was found to be very low. The low inventory turnover ratio was an indicator of inadequacy, since inventory usually has a rate of return of zero (Inventory Turnover Ratio Interpretation, 2009). It also implied either poor sales or excess inventory. A low turnover rate indicated poor liquidity, convincible overstocking, and obsolescence, but it would have also reflected a planned inventory build-up in the case of material shortages or in anticipation of rapidly rising prices. (Inventory Turnover Ratio Interpretation, 2009) And a rapid and unexplained rise in the number of sales per day in receivables in addition to growing inventories to cover the shortage was noted. The interviewee (Public Accountant) could smell something suspicious which led him for more detailed procedures and proactive investigation at the end of which a fraud was detected.
(Net sales)/(Average inventory at retail) OR Inventory turnover = (Cost of goods sold)/(Average inventory at cost) The first definition of inventory turnover is at retail while the second definition is at cost. Some retailers prefer to measure inventory turnover at retail while others at cost but there is no difference between these two definitions as they yield the same result. The inventory turnover rate is typically expressed on an annual basis rather than on month or parts of a year.
The Quick Ratio shows that the company’s cash and cash equivalents are the highest t...