1. What were the main points discussed in the film? The main points discussed in the film were that supermarkets seem like they provide a variety of food when in reality all of the food is produced by only a few major companies. Another main point is that the beef that we eat comes from cows that are neglected. They are eating corn instead of grass, which is not good for their digestive system, and E.Coli develops. Chickens are genetically changed to grow larger and faster than normal. The main point is that industries are dominating food production and cutting corners to make food cheap and fast. This is now harming us as consumers and could potentially get a lot worse in the future.
2. Did the presenters seem credible? Why or why not? I do believe that the presenters seemed credible because they interviewed the industries and compared them to local farmers. They used direct statistics and showed the truth of what real
…show more content…
What were the key points about Factory Farmed beef and pork? What were the key points about Factory Farmed chicken? What were the key points about the sustainability of the land in factory farming? A key point about factory farmed beef and pork is that the animals are fed corn, which is not meant for their digestive system. This also introduces E.Coli into the meat and produce from the runoff. Another point is that meatpacking is one of the most dangerous jobs and many illegal immigrants do it. A key point about factory-farmed chicken is that chickens are redesigned to have bigger breasts than normal. The chickens are stored in houses with no windows and little space. Some of the chickens are too big that they can only take a few steps without collapsing. A key point about the sustainability of the land in factory farming is that a lot of land has been cleared for producing feed for livestock. The cows and sheep are responsible for a lot of the methane generated by human activity and a lot of ammonia emissions in the US come from animal
Throughout the film, various companies are exposed for promoting products in a manner that depicts the products as a healthy alternative. The ultimate exposing is done on the government and the USDA. The government is exposed for making deals with food companies to not demonize companies that sell unhealthy food. Even Michelle Obama 's "Let 's Move" campaign against childhood obesity started out bringing unhealthy companies to the light but died down by emphasizing exercise and not talking about food.This is largely in part due to a deal made with major corporations who weren’t too pleased with the original approach of “Let’s Move”. In addition, the USDA is exposed for promoting products such as cheese, milk, and high fructose corn syrup in a fictional way. They provided no information that they were unhealthy in the
One issue the documentary highlights is the abuse of animals and workers by the food companies, in order to reveal how the companies hide the dark side of the food world from the public. In several instances, we see animals being treated cruelly. The workers have little regard for the lives of the animals since they are going to die anyways. Chickens are grabbed and thrown into truck beds like objects, regulation chicken coups allow for no light the entire lives of the chickens, and cows are pushed around with fork lifts to take to slaughter. Many chickens are even bred to have such large breasts that their bones and organs cannot support their bodies. These chickens cannot walk and they even wheeze in pain for the cameras. The film is clearly using the unacceptable premise fallacy of appeal to emotion in this instance, because the viewer is meant to feel pity at the sight of the abused animals. This supports their conclusion, because many American’s imagine their food coming from a happy, country farm and would be horrified to know the truth.
Do you know what factory farming is? If you do you probably switched to Free Range meat. Well there really is no big difference between the two. They pump so much steroids and hormones in the animal that they can’t even stand up all of the way. Free range farming is no better than factory farming. They couldn't go outside if they wanted to.Free range doesn't really mean free ranged and if it did they wouldn’t go anywhere anyways.
Ever since we developed farming, we have locked up our animals. We have impregnated sows and fattened piglets for the slaughter. The technique of farming is just different and on a larger scale. Because of innovations, farming methods have changed. There are also more people to feed in the United States. The prices of meat have to be kept low so that every family, even the poorest family can afford to have meat protein in their diet. Now that meat is available to poorer people, their diet has been better overall than it had been in the past (Deane, 2004). The activists who are against factory farming have blown the cruelty out of proportion. Yes, there have been factories that have deplorable conditions but those are few and far between. Legislation has been passed to protect the animals in the factory farms. They are not housed in the same ways as humans, because they are not human. Humans have always eaten animals and they always
Food Inc. addresses many political issues during the film to draw in the audience. Issues such as: the environment, education, workers’ rights, health care, climate change, energy control, to name a few. Director Robert Kenner exposes secrets about the foods society eats, where the food has come from and the processes the food went through. It is these issues that are used as politics of affect in both an extreme visual representation and a strong audio representation that has the biggest impact on the audience and their connection to what they are being told. This paper aims to discuss the film Food Inc. and the propaganda message for positive change, as well as, the differences between seeing food and deciding...
Factory farms have not been around for a very long time, in fact, the first factory farm appeared in the 1970s, and slowly others followed("The Rise," 2010). Throughout history, the government has passed laws that favor factory farming and large corporate businesses. Three policy changes in government supported the meat industry. First, the cost of soybeans and corn, which is
Factory farms; a place where meat is produced for human consumption, this definition only describes how the industry started. In most factory farms, government regulation is lacking. This is to the disadvantage of billions of animals affected by the dirty business. When piglets are born they are divided into breeding sows, and others solely for their meat. Thousands of sows spend their lives in crammed cages, undergo numerous forced impregnations, and become sick because of their cages are overflowing with feces. However this is only the beginning of the story. These same animals are fed food littered with growth hormones, glass, syringes, and are forced to cannibalistic ways being fed their young’s testicles. Animals in the farming industry face innumerous atrocities including pain filled slaughter, forced growth rates, and overcrowding for the sake of taste, however each of these problems must be solved by enforcing the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, and by switching to sustainable and/or organic farming methods.
One example of how the food industry is ruthless is when one of the CEOs of a fast-food chain states they are part of the problem is hired immediately. Though I don’t not find this wrong because if I was a stock-holder with my life savings invested within his company I would without a doubt have him fired for placing my money at risk. That is the harsh reality of economics, you cannot place you company in shock by either a damaging statement or bad executive move. I found most disturbing about the movie was how a case was being made against McDonalds that two obese teens did not know fast-food was unhealthy (Spurlock). Regardless of how they lived word of mouth had to have taught them fast food is not healthy, and if that didn’t health education has been in place for years now teaching us
Poultry is by far the number one meat consumed in America; it is versatile, relatively inexpensive compared to other meats, and most importantly it can be found in every grocery store through out the United States. All of those factors are made possible because of factory farming. Factory farming is the reason why consumers are able to purchase low-priced poultry in their local supermarket and also the reason why chickens and other animals are being seen as profit rather than living, breathing beings. So what is exactly is factory farming? According to Ben Macintyre, a writer and columnist of The Times, a British newspaper and a former chicken farm worker, he summed up the goal of any factory farm “... to produce the maximum quantity of edible meat, as fast and as cheaply as possible, regardless of quality, cruelty or hygiene” ( Macintyre, 2009). Factory farmers do not care about the safety of the consumers nor the safety of the chicken, all the industrial farmers have in mind are how fast they can turn a baby chick into a slaughter size chicken and how to make their chicken big and plumped. Factory farming is not only a health hazard to the well-being of the animals, but the environment, and human beings ;thus free range and sustainable farming need to be put into practice.
Throughout the film many statements are made and sources are provided, but how reliable they really are is a questionable matter as it is apparent that some fallacies are made that could change how effective this really was. One of the more noticeable fallacies is the one previously addressed that they would make claims such as that food industry is growing and so is diabetes and obesity therefore the food industry is the main cause for health issues. This is an example of post hoc ergo propter hoc that appears, where in these instances they connect the food industry’s growth to the development of some other negative event and imply that the food industry is the cause for all of these negative events without solid and expert proven evidence
Factory farming is raising livestock in a small, confined area on a large scale for the purpose of supplying food for human consumption. It is argued that factory farming is extremely cruel for the animals involved and that there are better ways for food to be produced. The food produced by factory farms may be cheaper, but the chances are it is also of lower quality. The animals inside these factories are not fed on a particularly healthy diet. Factory farming may lead to the production of cheaper meat produced, but this could be bad for society when the health consequences can result fatal. Factory farming should be banned worldwide because not only is it cruel toward innocent animals, it also results in economic problems and major health concerns.
The way that our society has been able to produce food has changed in the last fifty years that the several thousand years beforehand. Robert Kenner addresses problems of our society’s food system and how there is only a handful of large corporations that have basically taken over the food system in the United States in the film Food, Inc. Large businesses have been able to significantly produce vast amounts of food and set low prices for consumers, usually because of government subsidies, which results in enormous profit and greater control of the food supply sources. This leads to negative health, safety, and economic consequences. This documentary examines the exercises of the few large food corporations from the start of production
On the other hand free range farming may not be so bad after all as hens in factory farms are only given an average of 48 square inches of space and egg-laying hens are sometimes starved for up to 14 days. Exposed to changing light patterns and given no water in order to shock their bodies into molting. It’s common for 5% to 10% of hens to die during the forced molting process.In adition to this at least pigs in free range farming can actually move.Pigs in factory farming are in cages so small thay can’t turn around and are able to suckle their young.
The animals that are raised in factory farms, and the farms are ran just like any other business. According to the article Factory Framing, Misery of Animals, the factory farming industry strives to maximize output while minimizing cost, always at the animal’s expense. “The giant corporations that run most factory farms have found that they can make more money by squeezing as many animals as possible into tiny spaces, even though many of the animals die from disease or infection” (Factory Farming). This is actually quit disgusting that we eat food that walks around in each other’s feces and can attract disease. These animals live a life of abuse, but we sit back and say it’s okay because we will eventually eat them. “Antibiotics are used to make animals grow faster and to keep them alive in the unsanitary conditions. Research shows that factory farms widespread use of antibiotics can lead to antibiotic-resistant bacteria that threatens human health” (Factory Farming). These animals aren’t treated with proper care and we act as if they are machines. Chickens for example, become so big and distorted that their legs can longer support them. Eventually they die because they can longer walk to get food or water. According to Factory Farming, most of these animals have been genetically manipulated to grow larger and to produce more eggs and milk than they naturally
What most Americans don’t know is that their food supply is being controlled by a select few corporations. There are four food corporations that control 80% of the market; Monsanto, Tyson, Perdue and Smithfield. In the film, Food Inc., Tyson was reported as being one of the largest meat packing companies in the world. As seen in the film, one of the industrial chicken farmers under contract with Perdue gave a look into what industrial chicken farming looks like. The chickens were kept in overcrowded conditions that didn’t allow them to move. Many of the chickens died as a result of their accelerated growth and cramped conditions. The chickens were also fed antibiotics that are no longer working to prevent dangerous diseases. Corporations like Tyson and Perdue are producers of a large amount of food, in a small amount of land for a cheap price. Corporations have government agencies that are supposed to protect the consumer in their pockets and these agencies are allowing unsafe food products to be sold to consumers. Also in the film was the interview of Barbara Kowalcyk whose 2 year old son Kevin died after eating a burger that was infected with ...