F & M Protest Tree

1064 Words3 Pages

Anjeli Chapman Professor Guarasci The Pivotal Role of the Protest Tree There was a certain amount of anger directed at campus grounds officials when their announcement came in September that an ash tree on the Franklin and Marshall campus would be cut down to a stump. To some students, this antipathy made little sense. The tree had been diseased and in decline for years, and there’s an abundance of other foliage on campus. Why would anyone complain about losing one tree? But for a select few, its loss dealt a crushing blow to an important facet of F&M. A person becomes a social being through kinship, and this tree contributed enormously to the campus community by bonding a select few of its members together. The tree in question was …show more content…

It wasn’t an object that every person at the school has, like an ID card or a Diplomats shirt. In fact, in some ways it defied the traditional understanding of what an object is. It didn’t belong to a single person, nor could it be purchased by anyone or held in the palm of one’s hand. But despite this, the Protest Tree was still an object because of the invaluable social relationships that it formed. The sociologist Marcel Mauss might argue that the exchange of objects can provide invaluable insight into relationships. But one could also make the case that observing the power of a shared object is equally as informative as observing one that has been exchanged. Perhaps tellingly, Franklin and Marshall College itself has never sanctioned or condemned the use of the Protest Tree, meaning that the tree was entirely student run. Their use of the tree was far more egalitarian that many other elements of the school. Some aspects of college life are divided along gender lines: fraternities, sororities, single-sex dorm rooms. Many are divided by skill, such as sports teams or theatrical productions or honor societies. Yet the use of the Protest Tree wasn’t dependent on an audition or a pledge. The community that used was a small one not because of its exclusivity, but because only a handful of students made the choice to be …show more content…

One of the most interesting aspects of the tree was that although it promoted a feeling of community, the precise message that it communicated was different to everyone. Its importance lies in the fact that it didn’t convey the same idea to each of its users as a textbook might, but was instead open to interpretation. Students could therefore feel free to take part in any cause that spoke to them. For instance, Sarah Waybright, a graduate from 2006, says that she began working in the health food industry in large part due to the pivotal role that the Protest Tree played in her life during her sophomore year. As Waybright recalls, she and her friends would “decorate these little posters and staple them on. We had one that said, I think, ‘Don’t be mean, give us greens.’” The sense of community that the Protest Tree fostered carried with her after graduation, and eventually prompted her to start her own health food co-op in an effort to recreate that communal feeling. The Protest Tree obviously fostered kinship among those who bonded over shared outrage and sought to create political and social

Open Document