Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
After school activities and why are they important essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Last year we were allowed to go outside after lunch, but recently the school board has changed that, making us stay inside and sit at the lunch tables until we get released back to class. I think that we should be allowed to go outside after we finish eating lunch.
One reason to why I think we should be allowed to go outside is because it gives the students a place to go after they finish eating; rather than sitting at the lunch table until the bell rings. It gives us a place to walk around rather than sitting for another 15 minutes, like we do all day. It would be nice to stretch our legs and get a little energy out before our next class.
Another reason we should be able to go outside after lunch is because it gives us a little time to get
Lunch time is a time to take a break from the day and recharge for the rest of the day. In elementary schools it is also a time to meet up with your friends and socialize. Lunch time is not only time to eat. It is important for the mental, social, and emotional health of the children as well. Children need them chance to unwind and destress, which is promoted by socializing with friends. “Lunch should be an enjoyable part of the school day for students, offering a break from classroom work and a place to relax, socialize, and become nourished.”("The Cafeteria: Creating a Positive Mealtime Experience", 2013) Lunch time should be done in a setting where
Wandering kids. Bumper to bumper traffic. Drug dealing. Is this the picture drawn when local students have fifty minutes of freedom during lunch to do whatever they please? Students should not be allowed to leave their school campus during lunch. An open campus would lead to truancy, disturb local businesses and neighborhoods, and cause crime.
French students get 1 ½-2 hour lunch breaks, and many countries including France have off-campus lunch programs, where they can go home or to a restaurant for lunch. Why can’t Oak Creek High School have off-campus lunch? By the time students are in high school, they should be responsible and trusted to have off-campus lunch privileges.
The right to the student should be guaranteed to open campus lunch. We are living in a failed experiment, that is the government controlling the school lunch. It is time to step out of the failed experiment and do another experiment, only this time successful. Student should be allowed to have open campus lunch.
For the majority of high school students having the option to go home for lunch or to go somewhere to eat would be the ultimate dream. High school students do not think about the dangers and worry that open campus lunch would cause for staff and parents. They do not think about the small sum of students who would spend that time doing drugs or making messes at local businesses. There would also be an amount of students who would not return, or they may be late returning to school due to traffic at fast food places. Faculty would also have the fret of an increase of car accidents caused from the limited time students would have to go wherever and get back before their next class. On the other hand, students would learn responsibilities and time management. Parents would be forced to give their children money to eat out. Along with the money on their school lunch accounts, or they would be apart of the free lunch school program. Schools cannot have open campus lunches
This will give us the extra push that's needed so the lunch expansion won't be a problem. You’ll still be getting your education and also being provided with more than enough time to devour your delicious lunch meals. Teachers may think this is a great idea. However, students will not want to read a book or do any assignments in this period of time. The hour of lunch should be about eating and eating only. Reading a book will not harm you what so ever. It will only make you better.
We should not have longer school lunches. Longer school lunches has a great impact on everyone in school, it makes this issue worse. Students need what is best for them, which they already have. Short school lunches helps improve learning skills and lets students comprehend better. Our lunches are good as they are right now. We should not allow students to leave during school lunch.
Hobbs’ article, “Dallas ISD trustee pushes mandatory recess in elementary schools,” he explains the major advantages that come along with recess. It has become more common for schools to take away recess. The reason being is either that they use this extra time for academics, or they take it away as a punishment. He added, “Numerous studies have discussed the importance of recess in improving social and emotional health and learning”(Hobbs.) Recess is a vital part of a child’s day. Although recess has been a traditional practice in elementary schools, many schools around the United States are starting to reduce or completely take this time away from the kids. Recess contributes many positive attributes to a child’s growth physically and mentally. It challenges not only their social skills, but also their physical kids. It allows them to gain confidence in making friends. It also allows them to get the proper exercise needed
Recess has been one of the biggest debates of all time. Some wonder if their children are getting enough time on the playground, and others may think they are getting just enough. However, recess is crucial to a child’s development. Allowing for more time at recess in the schools is beneficial for the student’s well being. Students are more likely to have increased social skills, wellness, and focus. Not only is recess cognitively beneficial, but also physically beneficial. Exercise is healthy, and recess is the best time to go out and move around.
" Schools began cutting back recess in the late 1980's to allow more instructional time" (Jarret). Shorter instruction time means less time for the teachers to reiterate what has been taught that day. Another problem with recess is that if not properly supervised, children can injure themselves or one another. Also, some children get bullied while on the playground.
Every student in all grades were able to leave during the time a scheduled class did not occupy. (Saslow, Linda. “Schools split on “open campus” NYtimes.com). Open campus lunch is the allowance of high school students to leave off the premises to a local restaurant for the duration of lunch. School districts in America have opposed open campus lunch benefits due to common knowledge and concern for potential student endangerment. A reason why schools should change educational environment would be to accommodate what students’ need to create comfortable working conditions. Old school methods included the repetitive process of helping students through daily material every day of the week with one break. Off campus school lunch was an unknown factor to high schools back
As I mentioned earlier, school food is not appetizing. Most of the lunches are served everyday. There is not much variety to choose from either. This is when going off campus would be good. Students would be able to get better food with more options to choose from. There are also the students who go home for
Should students lunch time be extended and be able to have off campus lunch? Off campus lunch would benefit students in multiple ways, therefore, schools should grant students it. The school’s food isn’t filling and a majority of the students think it’s nasty. Off campus lunch grants students with numerous different fast food places. It allows students more time to eat and to relax.
Having freedom of your morning and ability to sleep in when you have no classes should be a freedom that is permitted for students. Most students can have study halls or free periods in the first or last period of the days and still can 't do anything with them. Getting an unexcused absence for not needing to be in school for a class because of weather or no classes is just a dumb system. Having more freedom and choices for your time should be given to those students who tried to find that time and can afford it to help through their school
The advantages include improve both students’ health and academic performance, On the other hand, the disadvantages is that have more tightly schedule and higher chance to get injured. By comparing both of it, I believe school of Hong Kong should provide more outdoor activities. Whole-person development is important for students, it allow students to have more experiences. Therefore student will be able to apply their knowledge and tackle problems while facing authentic difficulties. In order to have a whole-person development, we need to have a life-wide learning. Additionally outdoor learning is probably the most efficient ways to improve life-wide learning. Hence, having more outdoor learning activities mean a better whole-person development. To achieve this, school should take the initiative to provide more outdoor learning activities. It not only helps improve students’ both physiological and psychological health, but also enhances their academic