Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Brutus and antony's funeral speeches analysis
Brutus and mark antony essay
Analyze the character of brutus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Brutus and antony's funeral speeches analysis
Comparing and Contrasting The Funeral Speeches To begin off with, in Julius Caesar there are two men. Their names are Brutus and Mark Antony. In this play Julius Caesar gets killed, at his funeral both Brutus and Antony wrote funeral speeches for the funeral. Brutus is a reasonable and intelligent man who believes everyone can be persuaded by reason. Then there is Antony, who is outgoing and socialist type of guy. “Hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear. Believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor, that you may believe. Censure me in your wisdom, and awake your senses, that you may the better judge.”(Elements 831). In Brutus’ funeral speech, he uses ethics, in other words, morality. He points out how …show more content…
His goal was to impress the commoners. Brutus also appeals to reason and logic, while Antony appeals to emotions. In Brutus’ even explains his reasoning for killing Caesar.
“You all did love him once, not without cause; What causes withholds you then to mourn for him? O judgement, thou art fled to brutish beasts, And men have lost their reason. Bear with me; My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me.”(Elements 834). Mark Antony used very convincing characteristics in his funeral speech. Antony was not giving a formal speech because he breaks down and weeps. He was trying to persuade his audience to support what he thought about Brutus and the murder. Antony’s goal was trying to get the commoners to completely believe and see who the actual murderer was. Antony handled the appeal to
In the Shakespearean play Julius Caesar, the speech recited by Mark Anthony for Caesar’s death was far superior to Brutus’s because it appealed to the audience's primal emotion while simultaneously relating
In Julius Caesar two men, Antony and Brutus, make two different speeches but with the same concept of ethos, logos, and pathos at Caesar's funeral. Brutus claims that it is okay that he killed Caesar and makes a speech about it. Antony is the more persuasive speaker than Brutus because he uses ethos, pathos, and logos better than Brutus. Brutus has a way with the people. He is a politician, and he knows how to get the people on his side.
Brutus used pathos excessively in his funeral speech and they appealed to the Plebeians’ sense of patriotism and love. Before Brutus joined Cassius’ conspiracy, he was one of Caesar’s favorites, a close friend, and well-respected and trusted by Caesar. When Cassius brought out the idea of the conspiracy, Brutus anxiously pondered and conflicted with himself about it, but in the end joined with the genuine belief that it will benefit the people of Rome. He hoped Caesar’s death would end corruption in Rome, and the distress and sadness of the citizens. Thus, he used pathos in his funeral speech in order to appeal to the sense of patriotism and love for home. Brutus said, “If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer:
Brutus vs Antony The most predominate and important aspect in the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main characters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd, using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure, Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s. Both speakers used an ethical appeal to the crowd and established their credibility.
He also explains Caesar was not fit for Rome, he was too ambitious. Soon, Mark Antony arrives with the body to prepare a funeral. Brutus allows Antony to speak at the funeral. Antony starts off by telling the plebeians why the conspirators killed Caesar, “Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man” (132). Staring his speech, Antony seems to be cooperating well with the conspirators.
Mark Antony delivered a stronger funeral speech than Brutus by using his knowledge of his audience and what is ethically correct to them while appealing to their sense of emotion.
Antony, on the other hand, did show emotion and was able to persuade the crowd by his emotional speech. Both of their speeches have a different point of view, but Antony's was easier to believe considering how he felt and actually put emotion into it. Brutus' speech was very selfish and dishonorable. For example, "He would be crowned: How that might change his nature, there's the question.
By nature, the crowd of Romans will be more concerned with their personal safety than the death of their ruler. Antony appeals to his personal experiences and friendship with Caesar in a touching, personal, primarily pathetic argument; on the other hand, Brutus appeals to the Roman citizens directly by presenting himself as their protector against Caesar, a threat to their safety and liberty. Therefore, in terms of effectiveness, Brutus reaches his audience on a much more personal and convincing level with his argument than Antony was able to with his account of his friendship and life with
Brutus made his speech effective in persuading the people by using tone and rhetorical devices. Brutus was compassionate when referring to how he loved Caesar as much as Caesar`s friends of his speech. Brutus was showing compassion on lines18 - 20 when he said, "If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar's, to him I say that Brutus's love to Caesar was no less than his." Brutus said this to help the people understand the sorrow he felt for the loss of Caesar, but he felt he killed Caesar for the good of Rome. Brutus anticipated an objection by the people when he said he loved Caesar , so he went on to say on lines 20 - 23, "If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: Not that I love Caesar less, but Rome more."Brutus manipulated the people with rhetorical questions. He asks them on lines 29 - 33, " who is so base, that they would be a bondman, who is so rude, that they would not be a Roman, and who is so vile, that will not love his country," the people do not want to be against their country nor do they want to be so base to be a slave....
And being men, bearing the will of Caesar, it will inflame you, it will make you mad:” in this statement Antony used the audiences own emotions against them, making them feel guiltier and shameful. Brutus approach of pathos in his orientation was weakened because he used a more rule and forceful way of speaking by “Who is here so rude that would not be a Roman? Is any speak for him have I offended. Who is here so vile that will not love his country" Brutus tried prove the citizens that his actions were right because they were sor the good of Rome, but
If then that friend demands why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more." (3.2.19-24). His concentration on honor and nobility ends up being used against him by Cassius, who instigates him to kill his best friend. Cassius knows how naive and how moral Brutus is and he uses this information into making him help kill Caesar. Being naive and over trusting causes his first mistake and helps with his downfall when he refuses to listen to Cassius, who wants Antony to be also killed because he knows that he will seek revenge for Caesar. However, Brutus code of honor won 't let him approve the killing of Antony "Our plan will seem too bloody, Caius Cassius. We cut off the head and then hack the limbs, seem to kill Caesar in anger and then vent malice on his friends, for Antony is only a branch of Caesar."(2.1.169-172), he doesn 't want to be seen by the Roman people as a killer, but someone who 's doing what 's right for the people of
Greed, ambition, and the possibility of self-gain are always constant in their efforts to influence people’s actions. In Julius Caesar, Marcus Brutus, a venerable politician, becomes a victim of the perpetual conflict between power-hungry politicians and ignorant commoners. He is a man of honor and good intentions who sacrifices his own happiness for the benefit of others. Unfortunately, his honor is strung into a fine balance between oblivion and belief and it is ultimately the cause of his downfall. His apparent obliviousness leads him to his grave as his merciful sparing of Mark Antony’s life, much like Julius Caesar’s ghost, comes back to haunt him. Overall, Brutus is an honest, sincere man who holds the lives of others in high regard while he himself acts as a servant to Rome.
The Influence of Speech Both Brutus as well as Antony uses the power of speech in different ways to persuade the Roman people. There are multiple contrasts and similarities in their use of Logos, Ethos, and Pathos. Also, their speeches differ in how each man identified their audience.
What was the differences in the two funeral speeches of Brutus and Mark Antony? In the Shakespeare play 'Julius Caesar', both gave eloquent speeches in honor of him. But who's was better? Well, to Brutus' dismay, Mark Antony's was better. But what are some of the differences and similarities in the two speeches?
A later example occurs during the funeral oration by Mark Antony. Brutus logically gives his reasons that necessitated Caesar’s death. He informs them that he acted out of love of Rome and his desire to prevent tyrants from controlling her. The citizens embrace his words with cheers and understanding. However, their mood alters when Antony offers his interpretation of the situation. He passionately described the deeds Caesar performed in behalf of the citizens of Rome, which clearly contradict the opinion of the conspirators that Caesar was too ambitious. Antony carefully uses irony in referring to Cassius and Brutus as honorable men; the strategy wins over the citizens and they listen with growing anger to his words. He leads the citizens to the body and begins to show the brutal results of the murder while simultaneously influencing them to believe that the conspirators are murderers and traitors. Ultimately, Antony reads Caesar’s will, which leaves his parks, private estates, and newly planted gardens to the citizens of Rome.