Eve's Apology

1246 Words3 Pages

In Eve’s Apology in Defense of Women, the word “apology” more accurately means “defense” around the early 15th century, so therefore, Lanyer does not apologize for Eve’s behaviour; instead, she creates a persuasive argument emphasizing the need for women to become equals with men. Even though Lanyer carved her mark in history as the first woman to pursue a fight against patronage through literature, one could easily flip her argument and discredit her ideas because her lack of logical and biblical foundation. Her arguments against Pontius Pilate, her claim of Adam’s sin being more immense, and her defense of Eve do not have any solid foundations in biblical literature, nor are they built around enough logic to create a solid argument. Lanyer’s …show more content…

With this ethos and pathos driven comparison, she asks to “let not us women glory in men’s fall,” because men have been the sinners while women have been the voice of love and empathy (ll.15). The problem with Lanyer’s argument is Pilate is a victim of persuasion, just as Eve had been when she encountered the serpent. Pilate called out to his people after they demanded the release of Barabbas instead of Jesus and asked “What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ?” to which the people responded “Let him be crucified” Pilate recognized Jesus’ innocence, but fell to the persuasion of the crowd when he realized “he could prevail nothing, [and]... rather a tumult was made” so he rinsed his hands to try to claim the blood of Jesus didn’t belong on his hands, and he bent to the people’s will (Matthew 27:10, KJV). Ironically, Pontius’ sentencing of Jesus consisted of the same concepts of the downfall of Eve because of sinful persuasion - neither Pilate nor his wife wished for the death of whom they both saw as an innocent man. Lanyer claims that “[Eve] had no power to see; the after coming harm [of eating the fruit] did not appear,” but men and women alike know which choice is moral and which choice is immoral, and just like Pilate, Eve …show more content…

According to her, “If any evil did in [Eve] remain, Being made of [Adam], he was the ground of all,” so therefore, she assumed the root of all sin is Adam because of his origin (ll. 66). She builds this point beginning in stanza four where she claims Adam is “most to blame” because he embodied “strength” while Eve embodied “weakness,” but the problem with this interpretation is her focus on common patriarchal ideas. Her goal is to persuade men to let women “have [their] liberty again” and “...[be] free from tyranny” when her arguments contrast men and women, portraying women as empathetic and loving while portraying men as malicious and powerful, stressing they are indeed unequal (ll.35 and ll. 81-6). Because she focuses on pathos and emphasizes the positives she sees within women, she neglects her original goal to be be free from misogyny in exchange for portraying her gender as superior. Even though she claims to be the better of the gender by emphasizing a woman’s empathy and godliness, she describes Adam as “the perfectest man that ever breathed on earth” and uses the idea men are superior and more capable than women because Eve was only grafted from Adam’s rib, and not created directly from the dust (ll. 42). By using pathos to portray the contrasts between what she believes are the good and evil differences between

Open Document