Eurasia Dbq Essay

563 Words2 Pages

U.S. global hegemony was the top priority of the American government; the U.S. feared the Soviet Union solely because of their potential to challenge U.S. power. Schlesinger and Powaski contend that the only reason why the U.S. threatened Soviet expansion was that they were communist. The U.S. feared the ramifications of a communist Eurasia, not a Soviet Eurasia. However, as John Lewis Gaddis explains Stalin was not keen on exporting Communism and in the nations that he did invade he did not impose communism. For this reason, in order for Schlesinger and Powaski to be correct, they would need to concede immense U.S. incompetence in developing its foreign policy. Furthermore, the clear support for autocratic regimes before and after World War …show more content…

The reason why the U.S. was threatened was because, due to post-WWII conditions, the Soviet Union was the only nation that would be able to rival and challenge American power. Chomsky, Barnet, and Swanson contend that the U.S. feared Soviet control over Eurasia because they would take over the Eurasian economy and resources and threaten the survival of capitalism. To some extent this analysis is true. The U.S. economy and capitalism, in general, required free and expansive trade. Without allies and control over Eurasian trade, the U.S. economy would be debilitated. However, as Leffler explains before the U.S. could focus on developing a profitable relationship in Eurasia, they first needed to secure Eurasia from the Soviet Union. This was because the U.S. did not inherently fear the Soviet Union controlling the Eurasian economy and resources; rather, it was what the Soviet Union would be able to do with the economic prosperity that comes from it. With control of the Eurasian economy, the Soviet Union would be able to solve for its manufacturing shortcomings and build up a military force to rival the

Open Document