Ethical Characters In Shakespeare's King Lear

359 Words1 Page

Maintaining a rank and status while being ethical proves to be difficult in the play King Lear. The ability to be understood and telling the truth is nearly impossible, we see the results of ethical characters losing their former power and political characters keeping their power or gaining more. King Lear creates a “game” for his ego and to determine how the kingdom will be split but Cordelia has no intention of playing, and truthfully expresses her love. Consequently, King Lear is infuriated when Cordelia does not speak anything flattering. Kent, a man devoted and honour bound to King Lear says “Kill thy physician” “Revoke thy gift” “I’ll tell thee thou dost evil.” trying to reason with him explaining that using a game is not the wisest

Show More
Related

  • Character Analysis in 'King Lear' and 'The Book of Negroes'

    616 Words  | 2 Pages

    To begin, in the tragic play, King Lear, by William Shakespeare, the character of Edmund was used to show how a man is by nature ambitious, jealous, envious, and vengeful. Firstly, Edmund is the most ambitious character, eager to seize any opportunity and willing to do anything to achieve his goal even if it means hurting his own family. This is clear when Edmund plots against his own father; Gloucester and half-brother; Edgar to get hold of his father’s property. All of the efforts he put to destroy the relationship between Gloucester and his legitimate son, Edgar reveals his jealous envious, vengeful, and ambitious character. He could not handle the injustice in the society and he wanted to change his position in...

    Read More

  • King Lear - Family: A Medium For A Betrayal

    1038 Words  | 3 Pages

    Two powerful characters in the play, aging King Lear and the gullible Earl of Gloucester, both betrayed their children unintentionally. Firstly, characters are betrayed due to family assumption. Lear banished his youngest daughter Cordelia because he over estimated how much she loved him. When questioned by her father, she responds with, "I love your Majesty / According to my bond, no more nor less." (I,i, 94-95) Lear assumed that since Cordelia was his daughter, she had to love him in a certain way, but he took this new knowledge and banished her without further thought. Secondly, characters were betrayed because of class. Edmund, the first-born son in the Gloucester family, should have been his father's next of kin. He would have been able to take over the position of Earl upon his father's death if he did not hold the title of a legitimate bastard. In his first soliloquy he says, "Why Bastard? Wherefore base? / When my dimensions are as well compact/ my mind as generous, and my shape as true…" (I,ii, 6-8) Edmund believes he is at least equal, if not more, to his father in body and in mind, but the title that his father regrettably gave to him still lingers. Lastly, characters were betrayed because of family trust. Gloucester trusted his son Edmund when he was told that his other son was trying to kill him. Upon reading the forged letter written by Edmund, he responded with, "O villain, villain! His very opinion in the letter!…Go, sirrah, seek him." (I,ii,75-77) Gloucester inadvertently betrayed Edgar because he held so much trust in his one son that he was easily persuaded to lose all trust in his other one. These blind characters were unfortunately betrayed there children, but they did it unintentionally and will eventually see there wrong doings.

    Read More

  • Essay on Deception in Shakespeare's King Lear

    947 Words  | 2 Pages

    In King Lear, the characters deceive one another constantly. Most of them deliberately misrepresent themselves, but others are naturally difficult to understand. Some are trying to gain power while others are protecting themselves. There is an extreme contrast between reality and what each character appears to be to the other characters. This quality about the characters fuels the plot, bringing it to its ultimate end.

    Read More

  • Social Values in King Lear

    1221 Words  | 3 Pages

    In King Lear, Shakespeare portrays a society whose emphasis on social class results in a strict social hierarchy fueled by the unceasing desire to improve one’s social status. It is this desire for improved social status that led to the unintentional deterioration of the social hierarchy in King Lear. This desire becomes so great that Edmund, Goneril, Reagan and Cornwall were willing to act contrary to the authority of the social hierarchy for the betterment of their own position within it. As the plot unfolds, the actions of the aforementioned characters get progressively more desperate and destructive as they realize their lack of success in attaining their personal goals. The goals vary, however the selfish motivation does not. With Edmund, Goneril, Reagan and Cornwall as examples, Shakespeare portrays the social hierarchy as a self-defeating system because it fosters desires in its members that motivate them to act against the authority of the hierarchy to benefit themselves. A consideration of each characters actions in chronological order and the reasons behind such actions reveals a common theme among the goals for which morality is abandoned.

    Read More

  • Lear's Relinquishment of Power in Shakespeare's King Lear

    1486 Words  | 3 Pages

    King Lear is an actor who can only play the king. Thus, after he has abdicated his throne, passing the authority to his posterity, he still demands respect and power, which he is unable to claim from any of his former subjects, even his daughters. And as a king with no kingdom, he is an actor with no role to play, the most loathsome of all conditions. Lear himself realizes this, and in scene 4, he cries: "Why, this is not Lear" (4.204). And later in the same speech, he says: "Who is it that can tell me who I am?" (4.209). Lear is stuck in his role as king, unable to act in any other manner and powerless to provide for himself, causing the ultimate downfall of he and his family from their status of authority.

    Read More

  • Exploring Transformative Power Shifts in 'King Lear' and 'Taser'

    775 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alteration in power has major consequences with the structure of monarchy. In King Lear he renounces his departure from the throne. As well as dividing his kingdom “ In three our kingdom, and ‘tis our fast intent”. This is dramatic irony as Lear is unaware he is making a horrible decision with devastating repercussions. However this change was inevitable due to Lear’s mentality and fatal flaws. His pride and inability to see the truth blinds

    Read More

  • Analyzing King Lear's Tragic Flaws

    862 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first flaw in King Lear is his arrogance, which results in the loss of Cordelia and Kent. It is his arrogance in the first scene of the play that causes him to make bad decisions. He expects his favorite, youngest daughter to be the most worthy of his love. His pride makes him expect that Cordelia’s speech to be the one filled with the most love. Unfortunately for King Lear’s pride, Cordelia replies to his inquisition by saying, “I love your majesty/According to my bond and nothing less';(1.1.100-101). Out of pride and anger, Lear banishes Cordelia and splits the kingdom in half to the two evil sisters, Goneril and Regan. This tragic flaw prevents King Lear from seeing the truth because his arrogance overrides his judgement. Lear’s arrogance also causes him to lose his most faithful servan...

    Read More

  • Examples Of Pride In King Lear

    916 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the beginning of the play, we see King Lear give us the perfect example of being prideful. His actions showed his true colors, but it came back to bite him in the end.

    Read More

  • Motivations and Personalities of Characters in Act One of William Shakespeare's King Lear

    1473 Words  | 3 Pages

    uses the main plot of the play to create a sub plot within it. This

    Read More

  • King Lear And A Thousand Acres

    1288 Words  | 3 Pages

    The iconic playwright, William Shakespeare, is one of the most critically beloved writers of all time. His timeless stories still maintain cultural relevance today, despite being written centuries ago. Part of Shakespeare 's appeal, is that his plays can be understood by the uneducated masses of Victorian England, and still be intellectually edifying to British Nobility. Characters like King Lear, who are incredibly intense and tragic, may not require much thought to understand, but deserve a profound analysis in order to fully appreciate. Timeless characters like King Lear, have been emulated in fiction ever since the character made his debut in Shakespeare 's play. Larry Cook from A Thousand Acres, although not an identical representation,

    Read More

  • The Selfish King in Shakespeare's King Lear

    1012 Words  | 3 Pages

    When Kent informs Lear of his drastic mistake Lear?s pride takes control of him and he banishes his loyal friend, Kent. Kent is almost like a brother to Lear. He is Lear?s most trusty friend and basically the king?s right hand man. Because Lear is so arrogant and proud, he will not accept any disagreement from anyone. Kent explains to Lear that he has made a mistake in banishing Cordelia and Lear explodes with fury at Kent. This is the response Kent receives in return for correcting the king. ?To come betwixt our sentence and our power, which nor our nature nor our place can bear, our potency made good, take thy reward: ?turn thy hated back upon our kingdom. If ?thy banished trunk be found in our dominions, the moment is thy death.? (I.1.194-202). King Lear is saying that Kent is now a traitor, and since he points out a mistake in the king?s judgment he should be banished. If Kent shows his body in Lear?s kingdom once again h...

    Read More

  • The Role Of Justice In William Shakespeare's King Lear

    1339 Words  | 3 Pages

    William Shakespeare’s tragic masterpiece King Lear is as rich in plot as it is in language. Goneril and Regan’s plot against their father is placed at the forefront of the action, while the subplots of Edmund’s agenda against his father and brother intertwine with Lear’s deterioration into madness. While family drama dominates the action, it is easy to demote the Duke of Albany as a background character. However, as the play progresses towards the climax, Albany emerges from his wife’s shadow and asserts himself as an ally to Lear and is one of the only characters to instill a sense of justice. While Albany seems to be characterized solely as “Goneril’s husband” in the first few acts, he reveals the complexity of his character by turning against his wife, feeling sympathetic towards Lear, and thereby proving his morality and desire for justice.

    Read More

  • Human Nature in 'King Lear'

    925 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mankind has made mistakes from the beginning, yet man has carried on. Our nature shaped from the beginning since the original sin mistakes became common place, misunderstandings, ignorance in general became parts of human nature. Shakespeare uses techniques—such as the tragic her, subplot, irony— to construct a world where human nature is flawed. A world created to stage the many aspects of human nature that have evolved and corroded over time, becoming more complex over time. Kings tumbling from power, fools breathing wisdom, bastards acquiring power. Lear's kingdom is the stage Shakespeare uses to orchestrate this point, human nature is flawed, this holds true through the use of a tragic hero.

    Read More

  • Theme Of Love In King Lear

    1471 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kent intends to calm Lear down, yet Lear’s unstable emotions at the time lead to him thrashing out against Kent, even threatening him. This is interpreted from when King Lear says, “O vassal! Miscreant!” (1.1.159). King Lear’s tone is extremely hostile towards Kent, calling him a villain. Kent replies with, “Kill thy physician and thy fee bestow / Upon the foul disease. Revoke thy gift, / Or whilst I can vent clamor from my throat / I’ll tell thee thou dost evil” (1.1.161-164). It is evident that Lear made an advance toward Kent or threatened him in another way because Kent said killing him would be doing an evil deed. Through King Lear’s prideful, yet fearful and dismissive tone in his conversation with Kent in Act 1, Scene 1, it is noticeable that Lear fears that Cordelia is right about the fabricated love his two daughters express towards him. His pride triumphs in the end, leading him to believe his daughters wouldn’t deceive him for they truly love

    Read More

  • King Lear: A Man More Sinned Against Than Sinning?

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    A King is supposed to have all that he needs without having to worry about anything in his late years. Yet King Lear, in Act 3, Scene 2, cried out in pitifully: “I am a man / More sinned against than sinning.'; Although Lear has made a huge mistake in the first scene of the play in dividing up his kingdom and banishing his two dearest people, the sins his two other ungrateful daughters have done him is far greater than the extent of Lear’s wrongs.

    Read More

More about Ethical Characters In Shakespeare's King Lear

Open Document