Esther Duflo Poverty Analysis

494 Words1 Page

In the Ted talk called Social Experiments to Fight Poverty, with the speaker Esther Duflo who talks about how spending money on poverty can either hurt or help contribute to eradicating poverty. Esther Duflo also talks about poverty in a couple different ways through the following reasons; immunization, education, and doing something to stop poverty can really change the world. Firstly, Esther Duflo believes that immunization can help with poverty. It can help because immunization is the cheapest way to save a child's life and can help prevent Malaria, deworm children, and give poor people lentils to live on. With immunization, it can save a life for 300 dollars per life. Next, Esther Duflo explains that education can help defeat poverty globally as well. …show more content…

Firstly, I had learned that poor people also lack sufficient money amounts to live at a standard normalness in a society. Next, in class I learned through the ted talk that people, especially in rural countries are poor because their lacking education, immunizations and more. Next, in my opinion I believe that to stop or help prevent poverty, a suggestion would be to tax the rich more instead of the middle to lower class people who then could afford the basic needs. I believe this would work, because it would help balance things out in the economy so the rich doesn't get richer and the poor doesn’t get poorer so they can afford extra needs. Finally, in the Ted Talk, it makes me think about why wouldn’t more people help, especially the rich. Could it be because the rich thinks the poor should find a better job that will make money, causing the rich to not give? Or could it be greed is benefiting the rich, therefore causing no need to give to the poor. With these questions that pop up in my head there’s probably no real answer to stop poverty. To conclude, poverty is a big deal and I believe that more needs to be done to stop

Open Document