Essay On The Difference Between Huckleberry Finn And Grandison

2136 Words5 Pages

When comparing the characters Jim from Mark Twain’s “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” and Grandison in Charles Chestnutt’s “The Passing of Grandison”, there are many likenesses to the portrayals of minstrel characters that can be perused. This type of representation could have derived from different responses to the minstrel shows by the authors. Was Chestnutt and Twain using the minstrel mask to achieve the same sagacious insight into the degrading racial stereotype of the African American people and their culture? Or, is it possible that the personal convictions held by each author, regarding minstrel shows, a direct effect on their intended use of the mask? Are Twain and Chestnutt are using the farce of minstrel themed personalities as aspiration and admiration towards the genre or as a strategic play on the derogatory stereotype in order to pull one over on the reader? When the characters of Jim and Grandison are compared the evidence seems apparently clear. Jim remains trapped in the traditional plantation myth stereotype, whereas Grandison has been given the opportunity to reveal his mask and emerge as a truly clever human being. Twain was an enthusiast of the minstrel show, even stating so in his autobiography. Although, there is little information in the way of Chestnutt’s personal take on the minstrel show, we can assume he viewed the depiction of exaggerated characterization of African-American people as degrading when his ancestry is considered. This very well could be the reason behind Grandison …show more content…

This could have been a great place for Twain to lift the minstrel mask and reveal a genuine character, even if it was for a self-serving side of Jim that might have rubbed readers the wrong way. Unfortunately Twain leaves Jim in the shadows of the minstrel mask to forever be

Open Document