Essay On Right To Bear Arms

Hello President Obama,

I would like to say that rights are not always absolute, we should separate those who are substantiaing, and we should draw the line on where to call actions taken by the authoritarian. If someone calls in a bomb threat to an airport that has millions of people. Then yes of course that person should be arrested for putting millions of lives at risk, even thought the First Admendment still applies to them, it is justifiable. Moreover, it's all about understanding the significance of the Bill of Rights.

Thus, a problem we've been bearing is that citizens rights are being denied to bring their justily owned firearms to storm shelters. This is clearly a contravention to our constitutional rights, which deals with the Second Admendment "The right to keep bear arms". Personally I like this admendment because we should have the right to arm and protect ourselves, people should have

A person who legally owns a firearm should be allowed a means to protect him or herself at any time in any place. Firearms serve an important part in American society. They keep governments in check, they ward off some other citizens with hostile intentions, and they serve as a reminder that each one of us has the right and duty to protect the nation from our own government if necessary. Denying a person access to their lawful firearm is effectively giving ultimate power to government with absolutely no checks or balances from the people. Firstly I would like to address the issue of the National Government refusing aid to the local and state governments of my state. I understand that the 10th Amendment prohibits the National Government from taking control of the State or Local Governments without their consent, however the unspoken side is that the National Government has a responsibility to protect and care for its States and Citizens in circumstances that involve large portions of the state or nation and not just one or two