Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Plato and morality
Plato republic morality
Plato republic morality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
My own answer to this question is that there are times when it is right to break the law. In this specific situation I am going through that light, especially if I believe my life is in danger. My justification for going through the light and breaking the law is based on two considerations: 1. the original intent of the lawmakers was not to stop everyone in all circumstances but to simply regulate the flow of traffic and avoid accidents. There would be no accident in this case since there are no other cars. Emergency vehicles go through lights regularly and are not held responsible for breaking the law. Obviously I am not an official emergency vehicle. But a woman in labor could go through the light and might even be able to get a police escort along the way. I believe that while I am breaking the letter of the law I am not necessarily breaking the spirit of the law since I am going through the light because of an emergency. 2. If I go through the light and end up saving my life as a result, I have effectively submitted myself to a higher law that trumps the law of the traffic light. I will now consider the various thinkers we have been reading to discover if they might agree or disagree with my decision to run the light. …show more content…
He believes that I have a responsibility to my society to uphold its laws, even if doing so would cause me personal harm. The moment I make the choice to get in the car and drive I am obligating myself to obey the traffic laws. Do I think that my health is more important than that of my fellow citizens? What if everyone began to disobey the traffic laws whenever they thought their needs or wants were more important than the safety of others? Surely the very fabric of society would begin to unravel! Do I think I am more important than society? Plato is shaking his head at my selfish and illogical decision. It does not make much sense to
Plato felt that we have a debt to society and its laws, which we do. but do we have a debt to owe to immoral or unjust laws that harm other people or groups of people. So to restate myself it is completely justifiable to break a law if it can be seen as unjust or destructive to many people. Dr. King would have been more than right by helping a Jew in Nazi Germany even though it was to be considered to be illegal. Works Cited Huston, Tim.
In the Republic Plato compares the nature of the human individual to the members of a state. He thinks we are complex individuals, with more than one part in our souls. These parts can either cooperate or just be harmful to each other. Just so in the state there are different classes of people with strengths and interests in different areas. Those classes may be in conflict, and the state in an unhealthy condition of disagreement or they may cooperate for the good of the whole. If they do cooperate with each other it benefits the overall society.
PO demonstrated an understanding of today’s topic as evidenced by identifying and sharing how her distorted and error thinking has created problems in the past and current life. PO took part in the group discussion and shared openly and appropriately with peers, and appears to be in the action stage of
Plato views the democratic state as a city “full of freedom and freedom of speech[,]” where its citizens “have the license to do [whatever they] want” and the right to self-determine. Plato however, sees this insatiable desire for freedom at the expense of neglecting everything else as the downfall of democracy. To clarify, a society that is staunchly protective of its equality and freedom will be particularly sensitive towards any oppositions that seem to limit them, to the point where it actively attempts to “avoid [obeying the law and] having any master at all.” Thus, “unless the rulers are very pliable and provide plenty of that freedom, they are punished by the city and accused of being oligarchs.” Since those in power fear the accusations of those being ruled, they become docile and submissive. On the other hand, those who are ruled are encouraged by their rulers’ meekness and, convinced of their inherent right to freedom, begin to behave as their own rulers. Thus, this blind chase for unconditional freedom will propagate disorder across the society, and eventually cause the people to see “anarchy [as] freedom, extravagance [as] magnificence, and shamelessness [as]
Criminology as a genre is defined as the scientific study of crime, as well as its causes, law enforcement interaction, criminal behavior, and means of prevention. In its own way criminology is the history of humanity. As long as people have been on earth there has been criminal activity. Much like most other work atmospheres, it was a male dominated field. A woman seeking to work in criminology was unheard of. Men filled the jobs as police officers, lawyers, judges, and politicians. However, in the 1860s Belva Lockwood became determined to pave the way for women in criminology. As a women’s rights activist, she became one of the most influential women in criminology.
Prohibition: the act of forbidding or outlawing something. When you hear prohibition you often think of the 1913 prohibition and the 18 and 21 amendments. Often we don 't think of prohibition in the terms of marijuana. Original propaganda was formed by the director of Bureau of Narcotics Harry J. Anslinger whose persistent actions and manipulation lead to the rise of the prohibition. Harry spread the belief that marijuana was a devil’s weed that would make you go insane and on a killing frenzy; inevitably you would go to jail. With such a frightening menace to society the Marijuana Tax Act was passed in 1937 with no scientific study, public debate, or political objection (Grass). We all know this fear mongering was untrue. Now in modern times
Martin Luther King Jr. states “the law cannot make a man love me, but it can restrain him from lynching me, and I think that 's pretty important also." In this quote, Dr. Kings is referring to how biases the legal system is in the United State. His hope that one day the justice system will treat all man equal and race wouldn’t be a factor. However, African American and Hispanic are still being suppressed by the justice system. Police officers are still discriminating against minority and getting away with it. One can argued, that police are to be blamed for what is transpiring nowadays in our society. Furthermore, most of the riots emerged after an officer killed an individual and gets acquitted.
Although, Huntsville Police annually brings in the most drug arrests for the state, it’s not the city’s main priority to meet an arrest quota. Instead, the police force usually catch these offenders after stoping them for traffic violations. When an officer stops an individual for reckless driving and suspicion of driving under the influence, he or she will often smell a mixture of alcohol and marijuana. With probable cause, the officer will then search the vehicle and often times finds the individual in possession:
In this project, we were asked to violate a social norm in a public areas and make observations on what we saw and how our audience responded. The social norm that I choose to violate was to do some weird thing in the middle of the zebra-crossing by making other people wait. This experiment was quite fun and embarrassing to see the face of people who were waiting for my weird act in the middle of the road. I went with my friends to do this experiment in front of Fayard Hall. I monitored the reactions of many people from the front screen of their vehicles, from their repetitive horn sound, etc, throughout the experiment to observe the good result. This violation of social norms seems to be very dangerous, but still I tried my best.
The ideas that Plato instills are both detailed and distinctive, on the other hand he believes that actions do not necessarily justify a person but rather, he states that justness is more of an internal virtue. The idea he is trying to convey is that justness comes from the interpretation of the soul rather than the physical functions. The reasoning behind this is that if the soul remains just, then the resulting actions will reflect just ends. Once the fact that the soul must be just is accepted, the question arises of what qualifies the soul as just will need to be answered.
In a list you make in your report specifically identify the status offense laws that are being violated by each of the underage teenage violators.
While King, in his, “Letter from Birmingham” objects to following immoral and bad laws, Plato is of the opinion that people ought to follow laws and rules even if the may not be just. King bases his reasoning mainly from values which, he believes should be enshrined in the laws. There is a clear distinction between legality and morality as exhibited by the king in his letter. What is considered legal does not necessarily be legal, which makes King have serious problems with legality leading to his favoring morality over
Kourtney Pierce 2/18/14 CRJ 201 Addressing the Issues of Juvenile Justice and Crime in the City. Washington, DC is one of the most beautiful cities in the nation. Known as the nation’s capital, it is home to the White House, the Lincoln Memorial, the Monument, and many other historical attractions. While DC brings tourists from near and far to visit its natural and manmade wonders, there are some not so great aspects to the city.
The forgotten few: the juvenile offender population. Seldom thought about, but yet are the foundation and underpinning of the origin of the crime in the United States. This is an inquiry as to what has been done to the adolescents and children with regards to sanctions that have not yet been really brought to light. The problematic history of juvenile offenders is one of the United States dirty little secret. The literature shows the nations children who deviate from the norm are presumed to be deviant and treated like its adult criminal population. Teenagers, kids, adolescents are presumed to be treated as if they are of age. What is lost is the cognitive development and nourishment when such negative actions occur. The basic and fundamental formative academics that have shown effectiveness are not being implemented into the sanctions for these juvenile offenders. There is a linear correlation between low education obtainment levels, mental illness and juvenile offending and recidivism. This is a significant dynamic risk factor that has the potential to eliminate the deviance of the youth in the nation. The development of our youth mentally can indeed have lasting positive effects for sustaining positive results during their rehabilitation stints and most importantly decreasing recidivism.
Should the aim of law be primarily focused on the protection of individual liberty or, instead, the normative goals aimed at the good of the society? The question of law and morality is difficult mainly because it needs to be addressed with current social conditions that exist, the morals and values that the particular society has. In general, the laws in any society should not only be focused on regulations, but it should also protect individual’s liberty. Devlin debate was based on deciding whether law should enforce morality. He debated about what the law ought to be and whether morality should be enforced by law to form a good society. Furthermore, John Stewart Mill did not write specifically on law and morality. His argument constituted mainly on the anti-enforcers side of law and morality because he believed in individual liberty. John Stuart Mill's assertion that the only justification for limiting one person's liberty is to prevent harm to another