Essay On Animal Confinement

1833 Words4 Pages

Throughout the realm of animal production, there are two major practices: free-range and confinement. Free-range production, essentially, is when animals can roam freely. Confinement is when animals are placed either in cages or in very close spaces. Both practices have negative and positive aspects. Free-range is seen as more humane, but there are some downfalls such as the fact that animals are more susceptible to predators. Confinement is seen as more inhumane; however, production increases and animals are less susceptible to predators. According to David Fraser, on occasion, birds raised in confinement are placed on constricted diets. These constricted diets can cause aggression and behavior problems in some cases. With these practices, although, solutions to both are available. The solutions for confinement can include rebuilding structures to include sunlight and install larger cages. On the other side, the solutions for free-range can include building shelters for the …show more content…

By being raised in free-range environments, animals have the opportunity to roam freely. According to animal advocates, confinement is typically seen as inhumane, while free-range is seen a much more ethical way of raising animals. The animals themselves are allowed more fresh air and exercise rather than being inside cages for the entirety of their lives. Health risks, such as the spread of E. Coli and other diseases, are widely prevented by using the free-range farming method rather than confined farming. There have been incidents of runoffs infecting streams and spreading E. Coli from the manure of animals. By using free-range farming, there is not as high of a risk for diseases spreading because the animals are not as highly concentrated in one area as with the factory-farmed animals. In free-range farming, there is not as much runoff in one area and the conditions do not get to be as bad as they are with confined

Open Document