Essay Comparing Heart Of Darkness And Hollow Men

506 Words2 Pages

In the Heart of Darkness and “Hollow Men” both author Joseph Conrad and T.S. Eliot argue the idea of Kurtz and the hollow men having an empty soul and also lacking humanity. Both these characters live a meaningless life and do not have a lot to be proud of. The hollow men live in “the dead land the cactus land” and Kurtz lived in Africa where there is not much soiled land mostly “dead”. To the reader you see how the Hollow men and Kurtz show their life as useless. For the Hollow men this is proved through how “the broken jaw of our last kingdom” represents how they “grope together on this beach of the tumid river in a valley of dying stars”. As they look down the river the stars are dying just like hope of making it there. The hollow men believe in a god and as the stars fade away so does their hope. Just as how Kurtz got consumed into the idea of ivory and how it was so important in his life. “There was nothing above or below him he had kicked himself loose of the earth (Conrad 61). Kurtz had nothing left to stand on he had dug himself such a deep hole that he does not know where to turn or what to do. All because of ivory, which is what his life revolves around. Causing him to lose hope in the future “the word “ivory” rang in the air you would think they were praying to it” (Conrad 18). …show more content…

Hollow men states “the eyes are not here, there are no eyes here” The hollow men realized that there are no eyes in “this” place perceiving they can not actually see. In relation to Kurtz people believed he did not have a soul and people were almost able to see right through him. The men were haunted by shadows preventing them for doing what they needed to do. Kurtz had voices of shadows in his head that also haunted him.”It survived his strength to hide in the magnificent folds of eloquence the barren darkness of his heart” (Conrad 63). Kurtz’s words are a reflection of his

Open Document