Essay Against Animal Testing

556 Words2 Pages

Animal Experimentation Do not improve human health
92 percent of drugs have been tested on animals do not make it through phase 1 of human clinical trials (Noel Merino). Diseases that are artificially included in animals in a laboratory are never identical to those that occur naturally in human beings. Animal testing has been around since 1922 every year, more than 100 million animals are tested on. Animal experimentation, also known as animal testing, is the process of using animals to test the safety of products such as cosmetics and medication and to understand the working of a human body (Gale). 43 percent of adults surveyed opposed the use of animal the scientific reasons (Merino). I think that animal testing should be banned because the testing does not improve human health, animals do not have rights, and the testing is failing.
Animal testing does not improve human health. If you open a rat,dog,pig,and a human the same terrain but differences. These visible differences have an impact when it …show more content…

Animals don't have right like humans. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USPA) agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by a group that was seeking to expand the scope of the Animal Welfare Act of 1966. (Federal law in the United States that regulates the treatment of animals in research, exhibition, transport, and by dealers.) More than 95 percent of the animals used in laboratories are not subject to minimal protections by federal laws. Because they are not protected by the law. The only U.S. law that governs the use of animals in laboratories allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, and human damage. 9 out of 10 drugs appear promising in animal studies go on fail in human clinical trials. The failure of testing. The United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant

Open Document