Equality In Buddhism Essay

813 Words2 Pages

Furthermore, with regards to the stress on equality over hierarchy, in addition to there being a hierarchy of experience, “in Sri Lanka and many other Theravada countries, traditionally only monastics practiced the full eightfold path, including meditation; studied the sutras; and might possibly have realized enlightenment” (O’Brien). For the most part, lay people were told, “to keep the precepts and to make merit by giving alms to monks, and perhaps in a future life, they might be monastics themselves” (O’Brien). In essence, lay people have been neglected and encouraged not to help themselves but to help monastics in order to gain better karma in their next life, as they stood no chance of achieving Nirvana in their current one. This is much different from how it is in the west. As can be seen, “distinctions between monks and lay people does not fit in with modern society and western monastic orders are relatively scarce. Thus, non-monastic practitioners are often very serious and they power the various Buddhist movements (blomfield)”. In other words, in modern society, and in western monastic orders, the western principle of equality has significantly transformed the religion. …show more content…

However, this increased control of interpretations can and does distance young Buddhists from traditional and normal interpretations. Thus, instead of gaining understanding, the focus can become cloudy without the guidance of a teacher. In other words, “to attempt to read such texts without the help of a teacher and outside all established pedagogy would have been—and still is considered by some—folly” (McMahan). Furthermore, while on the surface, having equality with regards to opinion sounds like a preferred ideal, in sum, it is often folly and can lead to misinterpretations of the

Open Document