Environmental Racism In Hawaii

879 Words2 Pages

During a severe storm on September 13, 2016, the ʻIao river on the island of Maui flooded immensely, causing major damages to the ʻIao Valley State Park. The ʻIao river and valley are considered sacred sites in the Native Hawaiian community because of the historic battle of Kepaniwai between Maui and Hawaiʻi island chiefs that occurred there. In Hawaiian, the word “Kepaniwai” translates as the blocking of water, which was a term used to describe the piles of dead soldiersʻ bodies that blocked the river flow. For years, the water from those streams have been diverted with irrigation systems to provide running water for hotels and condominiums on the opposite side of the island. Native Hawaiians throughout the community have struggled for decades …show more content…

Coneʻs article, “Whose Earth is it Anyway,” he references the phrase “environmental racism,” which Benjamin Chavis created to describe how government and corporate actions intentionally exploit marginalized communities and the environment that surrounds them to further their own interests (Cone, 40). This aspect of environmental racism is present within the actions and statements of the Maui county government because they continue to drain the ʻIao stream for their own corporate gain despite the adverse effects it has on the Native Hawaiian community. Another component that environmental racism entails is the denial of communities of color to contribute to policies and regulations that have negative impacts on them (Cone, 40). Before deciding to remove rocks from ʻIao Stream and dispose of the landfill, Mayor Arakawa did not consider the negative implications that this process would create for the Native Hawaiian community and ignorantly dismissed their concerns. According to Robert D. Bullard in his article, “Environmental Justice in the 21st Century,” governments and individuals in positions of authority are able to designate public spaces that receive protection, which becomes exploitative because these decisions are influenced by their own interests and values (Bullard, 76). Mayor Arakawaʻs statements during this interview serves as an appropriate example of this system of dominance because he claims that the traditions and beliefs of Native Hawaiians are nonexistent due to the omnipresence of Christianity in Hawaiʻi. He asserts his own religious beliefs over the community as an attempt to justify his actions while disregarding and disrespecting the religion of the indigenous community. His decisions and statements exemplify the environmental racism and imperialist agenda that persistently disenfranchises the Native Hawaiian community from their right to access natural resources and practice their cultural

Open Document