Emotional Intelligence And Employee Performance

2971 Words6 Pages

Introduction
Emotional Intelligence (EI) has been used in the workplace to predict performance and even to select new employees. Although, emotional intelligence has been studied for years now, it still does not have a firm standing and there is confusion about what it is exactly and if it could be called intelligence. There are three types of emotional intelligence: Ability EI, Mixed EI, and Trait EI. Ability EI is based on Mayer and Salovey’s (1999) definition, which is stated as “The ability to monitor one’s own and others feelings and emotions, to discriminate among them and to use this information to guide ones thinking” (Mayer and Salovey, 1999). This definition includes four facets of EI: Understanding Emotion, Perceiving Emotion, Using …show more content…

Personality has also been correlated to job performance. In this article, the focus is between the relationship of job performance and EI. In a meta-analysis by Joseph and Newman (2010) all facets of EI correlate positively to job performance, the highest correlation being emotional regulation. A more recent study found the same pattern of results (O’boyle, Humphrey, Pollack, Hawver & Story, 2011); they suggested that EI might be important for jobs in the service sector, where employees deal with clients on a daily basis. Cote and Miners (2006) demonstrated that those with low cognitive intelligence but high emotional intelligence have higher task performance; as well as, those high in EI but low on cognitive intelligence have higher Organizational Citizenship directed at the Organization (OCBO). In the present study, participants will be collected from a service company, due to the increase of demand for these jobs (Desilver, 2015). Further more, because the service sector needs organizational collaboration from employees to be successful, employees in this sector might benefit if they have higher …show more content…

Salary and promotion (salary increase) will be obtained through company records. Rank will be coded 1-6; ranks from 1-3 represent administrative/manager positions and 4-6 will represent clerical positions (Lopes, Grewal, Kadis, Gail, and Salovey 2006). The 360° performance ratings, evaluate the participants performance by various peers and co-workers varying in rank. Typically peers who they frequently interact with rate them. The ratings are divided into two groups: insider rates (Peers, subordinates, bosses and self-rating) and outsider rates (costumers and suppliers)(Mount, Judge, Scullen, Systma and Hezlett,

Open Document