Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economic Systems Capitalism Socialism Communism
To prove that education is really a factor of social mobility
How important is social class
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Economic Systems Capitalism Socialism Communism
Equality and its Aftermath What is equality? What do we achieve with equality? Equality defines a state of equal rights, opportunities and status. With our present economic system equality can never be achieved, there will always be suppression and preferences towards different individuals. Inequality keeps rising, cost of living keep rising, and opportunities keep slipping away; will economic equality solve this issues? Economic inequality has been present since the beginning of civilizations, poor people serving for the rich and the rich getting most and in some cases all of the benefits. One very debatable conflict is if there is a need to stop economic inequality and the answer is absolutely. The United States has been hit by several economic …show more content…
” In the three years following the end of the Great Recession, the typical American family’s income declined 5 percent, its wealth fell 2 percent, it saved no more for retirement, and it was saddled with even more student debt” (Casselman). The recession struck the nation’s economy and the lower classes causing a downfall in the median income going from around $53k to $45k. The cost of living drove the opposite way and increased after this recent recession. After this recession the earning gap between the wealthiest sector and the others has risen, with the higher class earning nearly five times more than the typical American family. “The middle-class incomes have stayed neutral or have been declining while the wealthier classes have been getting richer. In fact, in 1988, the average American taxpayer was earning around $33,400. In 2008, that average had fallen to $33,000. The richest 1% of Americans, on the …show more content…
In order to advance into a higher economic class an individual has to gain influences in their school or work place, but unlikely an individual might not get this chance since their parents do not have the necessary connections someone in the upper class would have. “At the top of the income classes is the upper class, also known as the 1% or as the 5% because this class makes up about 1-to-5% of the entire American population” (Alhanati). The upper class families consists of two types: the ones that worked for a couple of generations to achieve a higher position and the ones that inherited their riches. “Households with old money are those that have had wealth in their family for at least two generations (sometimes many more), and haven 't had to necessarily work for an income. On the other hand, households with new money consist of households who have had wealth in their family for only one or two generations, and instead of inheriting their riches they worked hard to earn their wealth (Alhanati). The middle class has to create opportunities in order for future generations of that family to reach new levels of wealth, while the lower classes might not even have the opportunity to reach the middle class. Although some argue that there is not any economic inequality, there is even after several attempts made by the United States government to reach economic equality, it has yet to see satisfactory
America was once known as the land of opportunity. However, that is no longer the case. Americans are still suffering from a depression that began three years ago in 2008. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2007, the United States unemployment rates were 4.6 percent. In 2009, one year after the depression began, the unemployment rate rose to 7.6 percent. Millions of Americans are living in poverty, unable to afford the basic necessities. On the other hand, there is a minuscule percent of the population that are billionaires. Written in 2005, Holly Sklar’s essay “The Growing Gulf Between the Rich and the Rest of Us” argues that if something isn’t done about the growing inequality between the rich and the poor, the American economy as a whole will weaken. A year later, the Economist published the article, “Inequality and the American Dream” implies that the American dream is broken. Sklar’s argument sheds light on the Economist’s argument. In particular, Sklar’s use of facts regarding the wealthiest Americans, the poorest Americans, and the discussion of the impact of inequality on society provide insight into the Economist’s article.
The first standard of equality is ontological equality which is the notion that everyone is created equal at birth. Ontological equality often justifies material inequality. In fact, this type of equality is sometimes used to put forth the notion that poverty is a virtue. A second standard of equality is equality of opportunity meaning that “everyone has an equal chance to achieve wealth, social prestige, and power because the rules of the game, so to speak, are the same for everyone”( Conley, 247). Therefore, any existing inequality is fair as long as everyone plays by the rules. The standard of equality is equality of condition, which is the idea that everyone should have an equal starting point. The last form of equality is equality of outcome which states, everyone should end up with the same outcome regardless of
3. What are the effects of this wealth inequality in the US and what causes it, as well as some possible solutions and their ramifications, will all be discussed and answered below. There has always been a wealth gap between the richest and poorest in society. However, in the past decade, the wealth gap between the richest and poorest citizens in the US has been growing rapidly. In the 70s and 80s, the wealth and income growth rate for both poor and rich people were similar, however, between the years 2009 and 2012 the top 1% income increased 31% while for the bottom 20%, their income actually dropped and for the vast majority of Americans, the average yearly income only increased by 0.4% [4].
Aristotle said, “ The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” True equality is hard to come by when there are so many things that make people so different. The word equality has a very general meaning. That meaning however, can be interpreted in many different ways. To some, the interpretation can lean more towards a sense of freedom. This freedom has been something society has been fighting for throughout the entirety of history. To others, such as author Kurt Vonnegut Jr., it could mean the complete opposite. In Harrison Bergeron, Vonnegut portrays equality as a sort of societal imprisonment.
In the United States there are four social classes : the upper class, the middle class, the working class, and the lower class. Of these four classes the most inequality exists between the upper class and the lower class. This inequality can be seen in the incomes that the two classes earn. During the period 1979 through the present , the growth in income has disproportionately grown.The bottom sixty percent of the US population actually saw their real income decrease in 1990 dollars. The next 20% saw medium gains. The top twenty percent saw their income increase 18%. The wealthiest one percent saw their incomes rise drastically over 80%. As reported in the 1997 Center on Budget's analysis , the wealthiest one percent of Americans ( 2.6 million people) received as much after-tax income in 1994 as the bottom 35 percent of the population combined (88 million people). But in 1977 the bottom 35 percent had about twice as much after tax income as the top one percent. These statistics further show the disproportional income growth among the social classes. The gr...
Between the end of World War II and the late 1970s, income inequality in the U.S. was reduced; but since 1970s, the situation with wealth distribution has changed. Data from tax returns in 1976 show that the top 1 percent of households received 8.9 percent of all pre-tax income. In 2008, the top 1 percent’s share had more than doubled to 21.0 percent.
Income inequality in the United States, as of 2007, has reached levels not seen since 1928. In 1928, the top one percent received nearly 24% of all income within the United States (Volscho & Kelly, 2012). This percentage fell to nearly nine percent in 1975, but has risen to 23.5% as of 2007 (Volscho & Kelly, 2012). Meanwhile, in 2007 (see
Income inequality is a big ongoing problem in the United States. It has a big effect on what America was all about, the American dream. The American dream that everyone is equal and has equal opportunities. Although a big part of what goes on in the Untied States that just doesn’t fit the American dream; women are unequal in the work place. They are put under what is known as the “Glass Ceiling”. Women do not get promoted in the work place and aren’t getting equal pay as men. This also leads to wag gap between the men and women. Both create income inequality for women and affect their American Dream. There is a long history of women having to deal with the “Glass Ceiling”. Over time woman have made progress but more progress is needed to make things equal. Women suffer from income inequality because of the “Glass Ceiling” and wag gap, thus going against the American Dream.
America 's economy is dependent on the middle class. Slowly, the middle class is beginning to decrease. Soon enough there will be only the wealthy and the poor. Economic inequality is the gap between the upper class and the lower class. It is a problem that is growing everyday. Technology, education, race, gender, and globalization are the main causes of economic inequality. Each one of these causes contributes to the vicious cycle of economic inequality. The battle for our country 's financial wellbeing is upon us.
Being born into an economically disadvantaged family causes dilemmas before the kid is even born. According to Gulick, “Economically disadvantaged students have it tougher before they are born because they have less prenatal care if any at all” (1). Because the babies do not even have the care they need before they are born they end up being born with things that aren’t good. “Children born into poverty have lower birth weights, and many suffer from hunger and poor nutrition. When the youth suffer from poor nutrition and low birth rates it causes many complications for the hospital staff, the babies family, and causes stress on whoever pays the medical bill because the baby possible has to stay at the hospital longer. Once the kid is born the dilemmas go on and on. So how does being economically disadvantage affect people?
The line was extremely long and people would be camped outside just so they could see a doctor. Many people who were there had serious injuries and sicknesses and hadn’t seen a doctor or dentist in a very long time. One gentleman in particular was so sick that the doctors strongly suggested he go to the emergency room, that his sickness could be fatal. However, in the end, the gentlemen refused to go to the emergency because the medical bill would be extremely high. Income inequality is a social problem because a lot of people in society are affected in a negative way because of it.
What does inequality mean to you? Is it a means for people who live paycheck to paycheck just wanting to be living like others, or is it just a word? Equality is a word, and a strong one at that. Maybe even a stronger one than inequality is. Not being equal can be seen through many different eyes and races throughout the world. The fight for equal rights will always remain.
Income inequality is a big problem in the United States because the top, wealthiest American saw huge increases in their incomes, which the rest had their incomes go down. Bottom people do not have the same amount of money and the opportunity to move up the social ladder as the rich people do. In order to reduce income inequality, the government needs to tax the rich people more, and give poor people more money and more social services - education, food subsidies, health care.
No matter how many struggles are going on around the world about equality, it will never seize to exist completely. There will always be someone who has more power and more benefits in life than another person. Take the workplace for instance, there always has to be someone in charge, and the higher you are in terms of titles, the more advantages you get and the more that people will listen to you. The theory of Marxism explains it all. People may say they work with a team, but at the end of the day, there is constantly someone who has more of a say, and the final say as well. The higher power gets all the advantages, while those in a lower status only think they do.
It is difficult to apply the concept of equality to things, since the idea of equality is different from individual to individual, but in a way people do have a general idea of what is equal and what is not. This is seen in American society and how its people try to be as just and equal as possible. In America, we have equal opportunity but mostly in theory. Americans have equal opportunity to peruse happiness,life and freedom, but some individuals do have the upper hand when it comes down who gets head. People who have power, be it wealth or social class, have a greater opportunity for success and achieve the American dream. To have a good opportunity people have to have access to power, not only economical but social and knowledge. That's not to say that people from lower social classes can not achieve succeed. There are many individuals who have come from poor immigrant families and have gain a good social standing and wealth through hard work and dedication, but they have to work harder for those opportunities unlike others that inherit their family's class, and wealth.