Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction on political ideologies reflection paper
The influence of ideologies on politics
The influence of ideologies on politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
NO! In this great country of ours, WE, the people, don’t get to decide what to do about the issues that confront us. We only get to decide WHO decides. Our founding fathers set us up as a Representative Democracy. As a system of governance, it has its shortcomings. But, so far, it seems to have worked better than the others we’ve seen. Or, maybe not.
As a nation, we’re mighty upset with just about everything our elected officials have been doing lately. And, it’s not along partisan lines, either. At least that’s what the “experts” are telling us. All we’ve been hearing about from the news media, pundit TV, and issue-oriented talk radio is something called “anti-incumbent fever.” Apparently, we’re poised to “throw the bums out.” But, I don’t see how that’s going to happen.
First off, they’re not all bums, no matter how long they’ve been in office. Of course, this does not mean that we shouldn’t be on the lookout for good people with new ideas. It just means that we shouldn’t be arbitrarily tossing people out of office before we have better alternatives.
Second, collectively speaking, the last time I looked, Congress’s approval rating was in the TEENS. Individually, however, myriad constituent approval ratings for THEIR members of Congress were sky high. So, I guess this means that somehow all the other Congressional delegations are comprised of bumbling idiots, but OUR delegation is doing a superb job!
Out of some 45 primary races across the country—I’m counting all of them, not just the ones that make national headlines—so far only 3 incumbents have lost their bids for reelection. The local numbers are even more striking in terms of incumbents winning bids for reelection.
I wonder, though, is it possible for a polit...
... middle of paper ...
...us voters are stupid. I’ve always believed that most of us are smart enough to out-shout the dummies, but using the past 12-years as a guide-on, I’m beginning to have my doubts.
So, the question becomes; Do WE the people really have the final say and the power to back it up when the United States Congress decides to do what’s in ITS best interests instead of what’s in OUR best interests? And, if we DO, precisely WHAT can we do? Think about it; I’m just asking.
Diseconomies of scale! Perhaps we should take a look at that possibility before it’s too late. Break things down into bits that are more manageable and start demanding that news be removed from the entertainment realm and the United States Congress (ALL MENBERS) stop speaking in Tongues!
Joe Walther is a freelance writer and publisher of The True Facts. You may comment on his column by clicking here.
It is not uncommon to find members of Congress who have genuine goals of spearheading, designing or even just supporting good public policy. It would be harsh to say that every member of Congress is against good policy. However what is difficult for members of Congress is deciding what is more important, the wishes of their constituents or national policy. Although it is rare, members of Congress vote against the popular opinion of his or her district in order to make what would be considered good policy in the national interest. This hinders their chance of re-election but is necessary for America. In very rare cases members of Congress have gone against the wishes of their constituents for moral reasons like in the aftermath of 9/11. When voting on the 2002 Iraq War Resolution, I am certain that the last thing of the minds of members of Congress was re-election. A very conservative House of Representatives member Jimmy Duncan said ‘‘when I pushed that button to vote against the war back in 2002, I thought I might be ending my political career.” In times of crisis members of Congress have decide between what is right, not what their constituents believe is right. Another goal other than re-election that members of Congress have is their own future. For many, being a members of The House of Representatives is a mere stepping stone in their career on the way to better things. Therefore for some members of Congress, re-election does not worry them and gives them the freedom to act in an environment striped of the constant pressure of re-election. However, considering that most of the members of The House Of Representatives goals lie within the Senate or high executive positions, re-election is still on their mind, all be it in the form of a different
I am responding to Micheal Schudson’s essay titled “America’s Ignorant Voter”. He makes several arguments against whether America having relatively ignorant voters poses a problem to our society, and whether it’s becoming worse over the years. One of the arguments he poses as to why Americans seem so clueless about political matters is due to the complexities of our nation’s political institutions.
Thus, inactivity in voting threatens the very legitimacy of our government. In the recent November 7, 2013 midterm election, a few counties reported a mere 4% of eligible voters actually participated, in some cases, in voting for a policy referendum that would affect how millions of dollars would be spent in the coming years.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Mann and Norman J. Ornstein argue that the Legislative branch is the most broken branch of government. Congress was designed by the Framers of the Constitution of the United States to be an independent and powerful party. The Framers wanted the Legislative branch to represent the vast diversity of people of the United States, to deliberate on important issues and policies, and to check and balance the other branches. However, Congress’s role in the American Constitutional System differs from the part it was meant to play. The authors argue that Congress has failed to fill its responsibilities to the people of the United States because of the division of the Democratic and Republican parties, which leaves little room for compromise and negotiation. Members of Congress focus on their own needs and interests, and will travel to far lengths to prove that their political party is the most powerful. Congress has turned a blind eye to the needs of the American people. Congress cannot succeed in getting the United States back on track unless they start to follow the rules dictated by the Framers of the Constitution. A vast series of decisions made by Congress, driven by Congress’s disregard for institutional procedures, its tendency to focus on personal ethics, and the overpowering culture of corruption, led to Congress failing to implement important changes in the United States
In the past century, people continued to express an increasingly discontent view of Congress especially true when one looks back before the Clinton Impeachment debacle As the size of the nation and the number of congressman have grown, the congress has come under attack by both public influences and congressman themselves. Yet looking at one congressman's relationship with his or her constituents, it would be hard to believe that this is the branch of government that has come under suspect. In “If Ralph Nader says congress is 'The broken branch,' how come we love our congressman so much?” author Richard F. Fenno, Jr., provides insight into this view and why, through congress coming under fire, constituents still feel positively about there congressmen. Although congress is often criticized, its fine tuned functioning is essential in checking the power of congress without hindering the making of legislation.
There's something else troubling about the way we elect presidents--something beyond the personal attacks, the derelict voters and the influence of big money.
...ilities of Congress is that minorities and factions exist: dissent takes place, not disagreements. Verbal brawls take place rather than actual argumentation, and that is what kills democracy. That is why things never get done.
When the United States was founded, the theme behind the new government was to establish an efficient system without doling out too much power to any one person. The Founders intended to prevent a rebirth of tyranny, which they had just escaped by breaking away from England. However, when members of Congress such as Tom Foley, who served as a Representative from 1964 through 1995, and Jack Brooks, who served as a Representative from 1952 through 1994, remain in the legislative system for over forty years, it is evident that tyranny has not necessarily been eradicated from the United States (Vance, 1994, p. 429). Term limits are a necessity to uphold the Founders’ intentions, to prevent unfair advantages given to incumbents, and to allow a multitude of additional benefits.
Voting is at the center of every democratic system. In america, it is the system in which a president is elected into office, and people express their opinion. Many people walk into the voting booth with the thought that every vote counts, and that their vote might be the one that matters above all else. But in reality, America’s voting system is old and flawed in many ways. Electoral College is a commonly used term on the topic of elections but few people actually know how it works.
...ng to our benefit. Congress has several important and express responsibilities and while at times they may attempt to flex those powers in ways we don't agree with, or take the necessary and proper clause a little too liberally, we the people are always free to challenge them and utilize the powers given to us as free citizens to help decide how far those powers can really extend.
We the people of the U.S. have a voice. We are able to elect our own representatives. We are able to assemble together to petition our government. Our Congress and our president are subject to our approval via voting. In the United States, we are intended to have the power to govern ourselves.
Congress does not have our best interest in mind. Although Congress is supposed to represent the entire nation, it has been overrun by Northern interest. It should be the States, not the federal government who enacts laws that affect the well-being of an entire state. Congress has no right to ignore the pleas of half of the country and to forfeit law-abiding citizen’s property. The men who founded this great nation were trying to escape a tyrannical and oppressive regime; however, I believe that a similar repressive regime has taken root in the United States. This time it is not in the form of a king; this new regime is Congress.
Famous American poet James Russell Lowell once said, “Democracy gives every man the right to be his own oppressor” (“Quotations” 2011). And it should be just that. James Russell Lowell successfully defined democracy when it is in its truest form; a citizen’s beliefs should be equally represented and considered for. The representative democracy instated in the United States presents the need for three branches in the government; they include the executive, legislative, and judicial branch. The Congress embodies the lawmaking branch of the government, having “all legislative powers” as it is stated in Article I of the Constitution. To prevent one state from having too much power over other states, the Congress was separated into the House of Representatives and the Senate to have checks and balances over each other. Although they have several different functions in society, both legislative bodies play a very important role in representing both the citizens’ and government’s choices.
Paulson, Arthur. 2007. Electoral Realignment and the Outlook for American Democracy. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
More than two-hundred years ago, thirteen young nations defeated a tyrant thousands of miles away. The prize for such a victory was self-government. For the first time in human history, a nation had handed over supreme executive power to the masses. Exercising this power has become a hallmark of being an American. Even today it is thought of as one of the most patriotic acts one can undertake. The thought of a nation run by popular vote is a comfortable enough idea, but in the case of the United States, a self-governed population threatens to destroy itself and possibly the world through wasteful spending, unregulated pursuit of profits, and a blotted military budget.